Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Research article

The correlation between the number of vaginal examinations during active labor and febrile morbidity, a retrospective cohort study

Authors: Ohad Gluck, Yossi Mizrachi, Hadas Ganer Herman, Jacob Bar, Michal Kovo, Eran Weiner

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The association between the number of vaginal examinations (VEs) performed during labor and the risk of infection is unclear. The literature regarding this issue is not consensual, and the available studies are relatively small. Therefore, we aimed to study the association between the number of VEs during labor, and maternal febrile morbidity, in a very large cohort.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. All women who delivered vaginally ≥37 weeks, at our institute, between 2008 and 2017 were included. Patients who underwent cesarean delivery or who were treated with prophylactic antibiotics, or had a fever ≥38.0 °C prior to the first VE were excluded. Cases of intrauterine fetal death, known malformations, or missing data were excluded as well. The cohort was divided according to the number of VEs performed: up to 4 VEs (n = 9716), 5–6 VEs (n = 4624), 7–8 VEs (n = 2999), and 9 or more VEs (n = 4844). The rates of intrapartum febrile morbidity (intrapartum fever and chorioamnionitis), postpartum febrile morbidity (postpartum fever and endometritis), and peripartum febrile morbidity (any of the mentioned complications) were compared.

Results

Overall, 22,183 women were included in the study. On multivariate analysis, we found that performing 5 VEs or more during labor was independently associated with intrapartum febrile morbidity (5–6 VEs: aOR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.29–2.61), 7–8 VEs: aOR = 2.65 95% CI (1.87–3.76), 9 or more VEs aOR = 3.47 95% CI (2.44–4.92)), postpartum febrile morbidity (5–6 VEs: aOR = 1.29, 95% CI (1.09–1.86), 7–8 VEs: aOR = 1.94 95% CI (1.33–2.83), 9 or more VEs aOR = 1.91 95% CI (1.28–2.82)), and peripartum morbidity (5–6 VEs: aOR = 1.48, 95% CI (1.15–1.91), 7–8 VEs: aOR = 2.15 95% CI (1.66–2.78), 9 or more VEs: aOR = 2.57 95% CI (1.97–3.34)).

Conclusion

The number of VEs performed during labor is directly correlated with febrile morbidity. Performing five or more VEs during labor is independently associated with febrile morbidity; For intrapartum and peripartum febrile morbidity the risk rises as more VEs are performed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Downe S, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, Singata M. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:7 [cited 2018 13 Oct]. Downe S, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, Singata M. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:7 [cited 2018 13 Oct].
2.
go back to reference de Klerk HW, Boere E, van Lunsen RH, Bakker JJH. Women’s experiences with vaginal examinations during labor in the Netherlands. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2018;39(2):90–5 [cited 2018 13 Oct].CrossRef de Klerk HW, Boere E, van Lunsen RH, Bakker JJH. Women’s experiences with vaginal examinations during labor in the Netherlands. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2018;39(2):90–5 [cited 2018 13 Oct].CrossRef
3.
go back to reference (UK) NCC for W and CH. Normal labour: first stage. 2007 [cited 2018 13 Oct]. (UK) NCC for W and CH. Normal labour: first stage. 2007 [cited 2018 13 Oct].
4.
go back to reference Borders N, Lawton R, Martin SR. A Clinical Audit of the Number of Vaginal Examinations in Labor: A NOVEL Idea. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57(2):139–44 [cited 2018 13 Oct].CrossRef Borders N, Lawton R, Martin SR. A Clinical Audit of the Number of Vaginal Examinations in Labor: A NOVEL Idea. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57(2):139–44 [cited 2018 13 Oct].CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Newton ER. Chorioamnionitis and intraamniotic infection. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1993. 36(4):795–808 [cited 2018 1 Nov]. Newton ER. Chorioamnionitis and intraamniotic infection. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1993. 36(4):795–808 [cited 2018 1 Nov].
6.
go back to reference Gibbs RS, Duff P. Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(5 Pt 1):1317–26 [cited 2018 1 Nov].CrossRef Gibbs RS, Duff P. Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(5 Pt 1):1317–26 [cited 2018 1 Nov].CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Duff P. Maternal and perinatal infection — bacterial [internet]. Seventh Ed. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Elsevier Inc.; 2012. 1140–1155 p. Duff P. Maternal and perinatal infection — bacterial [internet]. Seventh Ed. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Elsevier Inc.; 2012. 1140–1155 p.
8.
go back to reference Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Froggatt JW, Baker ME, Hopwood H, Nesbitt T, et al. Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):304–10.CrossRef Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Froggatt JW, Baker ME, Hopwood H, Nesbitt T, et al. Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):304–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, et al. International multicentre term prelabor rupture of membranes study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(5):1024–9.CrossRef Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, et al. International multicentre term prelabor rupture of membranes study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(5):1024–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018 [cited 2018 13 Oct]. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018 [cited 2018 13 Oct].
11.
go back to reference Shepherd A, Cheyne H. The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):49–54 [cited 2018 13 Oct].CrossRef Shepherd A, Cheyne H. The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):49–54 [cited 2018 13 Oct].CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cahill AG, Duffy CR, Odibo AO. Number of Cervical Examinations and Risk of Intrapartum Maternal Fever. 2012;119(6):1096–101. Cahill AG, Duffy CR, Odibo AO. Number of Cervical Examinations and Risk of Intrapartum Maternal Fever. 2012;119(6):1096–101.
13.
go back to reference Soper DE, Glen Mayhall C, Dalton HP. Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: A prospective epidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(3):562–8.CrossRef Soper DE, Glen Mayhall C, Dalton HP. Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: A prospective epidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(3):562–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The correlation between the number of vaginal examinations during active labor and febrile morbidity, a retrospective cohort study
Authors
Ohad Gluck
Yossi Mizrachi
Hadas Ganer Herman
Jacob Bar
Michal Kovo
Eran Weiner
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02925-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue