Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Lithuania’s experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas

Authors: Justina Kacerauskiene, Meile Minkauskiene, Tahir Mahmood, Egle Bartuseviciene, Dalia R. Railaite, Arnoldas Bartusevicius, Mindaugas Kliucinskas, Ruta J. Nadisauskiene, Kastytis Smigelskas, Kornelija Maciuliene, Grazina Drasutiene, Diana Ramasauskaite

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the role of the TGCS to reduce the caesarean section (CS) rate among nulliparas (Robson groups 1 and 2) and to find out which group of women have reduced the CS rate by using this tool.

Methods

The Robson classification was introduced in Lithuanian hospitals prospectively classifying all the deliveries in 2012. The CS rate overall and in each Robson group was calculated and the results were discussed. The analysis was repeated in 2014 and the data from the selected hospitals were compared using MS EXCEL and SPSS 23.0.

Results

Nulliparas accounted for 43% (3746/8718) and 44.6% (3585/8046) of all the deliveries in 2012 and 2014 years, respectively. The CS rate among nulliparas decreased from 23.9% (866/3626) in 2012 to 19.0% (665/3502) in 2014 (p < 0.001).The greatest decrease in absolute contribution to the overall CS rate was recorded in groups 1 (p = 0.005) and 2B (p < 0.001). Perinatal mortality was 3.5 in 2012 and 3.1 in 2014 per 1000 deliveries (p = 0.764).

Conclusion

The TGCS can work as an audit intervention that could help to reduce the CS rate without a negative impact on perinatal mortality.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth. 2007;34(1):53–64.CrossRef Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth. 2007;34(1):53–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Le Ray C, Blondel B, Prunet C, Khireddine I, Deneux-Tharaux C, Goffinet F. Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population? BJOG. 2015;122(5):690–9.CrossRef Le Ray C, Blondel B, Prunet C, Khireddine I, Deneux-Tharaux C, Goffinet F. Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population? BJOG. 2015;122(5):690–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Lewis RM, Likis FE, McKoy JN, et al. Strategies to Reduce Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Women. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Lewis RM, Likis FE, McKoy JN, et al. Strategies to Reduce Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Women. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Blomberg M. Avoiding the first cesarean section-results of structured organizational and cultural changes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(5):580–6.CrossRef Blomberg M. Avoiding the first cesarean section-results of structured organizational and cultural changes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(5):580–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betrán AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(1):36–42.CrossRef Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betrán AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(1):36–42.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhanh JJ, Gulmezoglu AM. for the WHO working group on caesarean section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667–70.CrossRef Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhanh JJ, Gulmezoglu AM. for the WHO working group on caesarean section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667–70.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Maternal Med Rev. 2001;12:23–39.CrossRef Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Maternal Med Rev. 2001;12:23–39.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jackson S, Gregory KD. Management of the first stage of labor: potential strategies to lower the cesarean delivery rate. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):217–26.CrossRef Jackson S, Gregory KD. Management of the first stage of labor: potential strategies to lower the cesarean delivery rate. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):217–26.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRef Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kacerauskiene J, Bartuseviciene E, Railaite DR, Minkauskiene M, Bartusevicius A, Kliucinskas M, et al. Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice: Lithuania’s experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:432.CrossRef Kacerauskiene J, Bartuseviciene E, Railaite DR, Minkauskiene M, Bartusevicius A, Kliucinskas M, et al. Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice: Lithuania’s experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:432.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: the 10- group classification system (Robson classification), induction of labor, and caesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1):S23–7.CrossRef Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: the 10- group classification system (Robson classification), induction of labor, and caesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1):S23–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Scarella A, Chamy V, Sepúlveda M, Belizán JM. Medical audit using the ten Group classification system and its impact on the cesarean section rate. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):136–40.CrossRef Scarella A, Chamy V, Sepúlveda M, Belizán JM. Medical audit using the ten Group classification system and its impact on the cesarean section rate. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):136–40.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Svelato A, Meroni MG, Poli M, Perino A, Spinoso R, Ragusa A. How to reduce caesarean sections in first four Robson’s classes. BJOG. 2014;121:91. Svelato A, Meroni MG, Poli M, Perino A, Spinoso R, Ragusa A. How to reduce caesarean sections in first four Robson’s classes. BJOG. 2014;121:91.
16.
go back to reference Piffer S, Pederzini F, Tenaglia F, Paoli A, Nicolodi F, Luewink A. The Robson ten group classification of cesarean section in 7 alpine maternity units in an homogenous area. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:S122–3. Piffer S, Pederzini F, Tenaglia F, Paoli A, Nicolodi F, Luewink A. The Robson ten group classification of cesarean section in 7 alpine maternity units in an homogenous area. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:S122–3.
17.
go back to reference Aguiar RAP, Gaspar J, Reis ZSN, Santos MR Jr, Correa MD Jr. Implementation of the Caesarean Births Review using the ten group Robson‘s classification and its immediate effects on the rate of caesareans, at a university hospital. Poster presented at the international congress Birth: Clinical Challenges in Labor and Delivery. Fortaleza: BJOG; 2015. p. p21. Aguiar RAP, Gaspar J, Reis ZSN, Santos MR Jr, Correa MD Jr. Implementation of the Caesarean Births Review using the ten group Robson‘s classification and its immediate effects on the rate of caesareans, at a university hospital. Poster presented at the international congress Birth: Clinical Challenges in Labor and Delivery. Fortaleza: BJOG; 2015. p. p21.
18.
go back to reference Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson W, Wright H. Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the western electric company, Hawthorne works Chicago. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1939. Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson W, Wright H. Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the western electric company, Hawthorne works Chicago. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1939.
Metadata
Title
Lithuania’s experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas
Authors
Justina Kacerauskiene
Meile Minkauskiene
Tahir Mahmood
Egle Bartuseviciene
Dalia R. Railaite
Arnoldas Bartusevicius
Mindaugas Kliucinskas
Ruta J. Nadisauskiene
Kastytis Smigelskas
Kornelija Maciuliene
Grazina Drasutiene
Diana Ramasauskaite
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2052-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue