Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania’s experience

Authors: Justina Kacerauskiene, Egle Bartuseviciene, Dalia Regina Railaite, Meile Minkauskiene, Arnoldas Bartusevicius, Mindaugas Kliucinskas, Renata Simoliuniene, Ruta J. Nadisauskiene

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the cesarean section (CS) rate in Lithuania, identify the groups of women that influence it using the Robson classification and to determine the impact of implementing the use of the Robson classification on the CS rate.

Methods

The Robson classification was introduced in Lithuanian hospitals prospectively classifying all the deliveries in 2012. The overall CS rate, sizes of the Robson groups of women, CS rate in each group and contribution to the overall CS rate from each group was calculated and the results were discussed. The analysis was repeated in 2014 and the data were compared using MS EXCEL and SPSS 23.0.

Results

Nineteen Lithuanian hospitals participated in the study. They represented 84.1% of the deliveries (23,742 out of 28,230) in 2012 and 88.5% of the deliveries (24,653 out of 27,872) in 2014. The CS rate decreased from 26.9% (6379/23,742) in 2012 to 22.7% (5605/24,653) in 2014 (p < 0.001). The greatest contributions to the overall CS rate were made by groups 1, 2 and 5. The greatest decrease in the CS rate was detected in group 2. The absolute contribution to the overall CS rate decreased from 4.9% to 3.8%.

Conclusion

The Robson classification can work as an audit tool to identify the groups that have the greatest impact on the CS rate. It also helps to develop a strategy focussing on the reduction of the CS rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7628):1025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7628):1025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, Bréart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3):541–8.CrossRefPubMed Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, Bréart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3):541–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an “intention-to-treat” model. Birth. 2008;35(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an “intention-to-treat” model. Birth. 2008;35(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Scarella A, Chamy V, Sepúlveda M, Belizán JM. Medical audit using the ten Group classification system and its impact on the cesarean section rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):136–40.CrossRefPubMed Scarella A, Chamy V, Sepúlveda M, Belizán JM. Medical audit using the ten Group classification system and its impact on the cesarean section rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):136–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819–29.CrossRefPubMed Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819–29.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Poma PA. Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(6):1013–8.PubMed Poma PA. Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(6):1013–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRefPubMed Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson W, Wright H. Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the western electric company, Hawthorne works Chicago. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1939. Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson W, Wright H. Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the western electric company, Hawthorne works Chicago. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1939.
11.
go back to reference Saha S, Saha S, Das R, Chakraborty M, Bala HS, Naskar P. Paradigm shift to check the increasing trend of cesarean delivery is the need of hour: but how? J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(4):391–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saha S, Saha S, Das R, Chakraborty M, Bala HS, Naskar P. Paradigm shift to check the increasing trend of cesarean delivery is the need of hour: but how? J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(4):391–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1):199–205.CrossRefPubMed Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1):199–205.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Dillen J, Lim F, van Rijssel E. Introducing caesarean section audit in regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):151–6.CrossRefPubMed van Dillen J, Lim F, van Rijssel E. Introducing caesarean section audit in regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):151–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Hassanin AI, Ibraheem AA. Analysis of caesarean delivery at Assiut university hospital using the ten Group classification system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(2):119-23. Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Hassanin AI, Ibraheem AA. Analysis of caesarean delivery at Assiut university hospital using the ten Group classification system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(2):119-23.
Metadata
Title
Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania’s experience
Authors
Justina Kacerauskiene
Egle Bartuseviciene
Dalia Regina Railaite
Meile Minkauskiene
Arnoldas Bartusevicius
Mindaugas Kliucinskas
Renata Simoliuniene
Ruta J. Nadisauskiene
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1625-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue