Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Silent voices: institutional disrespect and abuse during delivery among women of Varanasi district, northern India

Authors: Shreeporna Bhattacharya, T. K. Sundari Ravindran

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A considerable amount of qualitative evidence reporting abusive treatment of women during delivery by health providers is available. However, there is a dearth of information regarding the actual prevalence and nature of such abuse, which this study aimed to explore.

Methods

We conducted a community based cross-sectional study using a contextually adapted version of the Staha (meaning ‘respect’ in Swahili) project questionnaire among 410 rural women who delivered between June, 2014 to August 2015 at any health facility of Varanasi district, northern India. We selected the women through multi-stage cluster random sampling from two rural blocks of Varanasi, which recorded the highest number of institutional deliveries in 2014–15.

Results

The frequency of any abusive behavior (excluding inappropriate demands of money due to its high prevalence-90.5%) was 28.8%. The reported abuses were non-dignified care including verbal abuse and derogatory insults related to the woman’s sexual behavior (19.3%); physical abuse (13.4%); neglect or abandonment (8.5%); non-confidential care (5.6%); and feeling humiliation due to lack of cleanliness bordering on filth (4.9%). Women were abused during labor or delivery irrespective of their socio-demographic background. Bivariate analysis using Chi-square tests showed statistically significant associations between abuse and provider type, facility type, and presence of complications during delivery. Binary logistic regression indicated that the odds of being abused was four times higher in those women who experienced complications during delivery. Though statistically insignificant, and contrary to expectations, women also seemed to be abused in private institutions; but with a lower frequency and of lesser severity.

Conclusions

The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during labor or delivery was high among women irrespective of their socio-demographic background or delivery conditions in government as well as private health facilities. If the problem of disrespect and abuse is not addressed, it can be assumed that such harsh practices might promote home deliveries, which despite being more unsafe provide an empathetic environment in lieu of safe facility-based birthing options.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Kumar S. Reducing maternal mortality in India: policy, equity and quality issues. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54:57–64.CrossRefPubMed Kumar S. Reducing maternal mortality in India: policy, equity and quality issues. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54:57–64.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. USAID / TRAction Project; 2010. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. USAID / TRAction Project; 2010.
21.
go back to reference Patel P, Makadia K, Kedia G. Study to assess the extent of disrespect and abuse in facility based child birth among women residing in urban slum area of Ahmedabad. Int J Multidisciplinary Res Development. 2015;2:25–7. Patel P, Makadia K, Kedia G. Study to assess the extent of disrespect and abuse in facility based child birth among women residing in urban slum area of Ahmedabad. Int J Multidisciplinary Res Development. 2015;2:25–7.
22.
go back to reference Mony P, Raju M. Evaluation of ASHA programme in Karnataka under the National Rural Health Mission. BMC Proc BioMed Central. 2012;6:5–12. Mony P, Raju M. Evaluation of ASHA programme in Karnataka under the National Rural Health Mission. BMC Proc BioMed Central. 2012;6:5–12.
23.
go back to reference Freedman L, Ramsey K, Abuya T, et al. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:915–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Freedman L, Ramsey K, Abuya T, et al. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92:915–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Dahlen HG, Downe S, Duff M, et al. Vaginal examination during normal labour: routine examination or routine intervention? Int Journal Childbirth. 2013;3:142–52.CrossRef Dahlen HG, Downe S, Duff M, et al. Vaginal examination during normal labour: routine examination or routine intervention? Int Journal Childbirth. 2013;3:142–52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Silent voices: institutional disrespect and abuse during delivery among women of Varanasi district, northern India
Authors
Shreeporna Bhattacharya
T. K. Sundari Ravindran
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1970-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue