Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Support provided by midwives to women during labour in a public hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa: a participant observation study

Author: Maria S. Maputle

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physical presence during labour offer women opportunity of having positive childbirth experiences as well as childbirth outcomes. The study aimed to determine what support provided by midwives during intrapartum care at a public hospital in Limpopo Province. The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Limpopo Province.

Methods

A participant observation approach was used to achieve the objectives of the study. The population comprised of all women who were admitted with labour and for delivery and midwives who were providing midwifery care in the obstetric unit of a tertiary public hospital in Limpopo Province. Non-probability, purposive and convenience sampling were used to sample 24 women and 12 midwives. Data were collected through participant observations which included unstructured conversations with the use of observational guide, field notes of all events and conversations that occurred when women interact with midwives were recorded verbatim and a Visual Analog Scale to complement the observations. Data were analysed qualitatively but were presented in the tables and bar graphs.

Results

Five themes emerged as support provided by midwives during labour, namely; communication between women and midwives, informational support, emotional support activities, interpretation of the experienced labour pain and supportive care activities during labour.

Conclusion

The communication between woman and midwife was occurring as part of midwifery care and very limited for empowering. The information sharing focused on the assistive actions rather than on the activities that would promote mothers’ participation. The emotional support activities indicated lack of respect and disregard cultural preferences and this contributed to inability to exercise choices in decision-making. The study recommended the implementation of Batho Pele principles in order to provide woman-centred care during labour.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Department of Public Services and Administration. White paper on transforming public service delivery, Government Gazette 388 (18340), Government Printer, Pretoria. 1997.
2.
Raphael-Leff J. Psychological processes of childbearing. 4th ed. Guildford, UK: Anna Freud Centre; 2005.
3.
Lundgren I. Releasing and relieving encounters. Experiences of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Faculty of medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 2002.
4.
5.
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Weston J. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD003766.
6.
Rosen P. Supporting women in labor: analysis of different types of caregivers. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 2004;49(1):24–31.PubMed
7.
Simkin P. Reducing pain and enhancing progress in labour: a guide to non-pharmacologic methods for maternity caregivers. Birth. 1995;22(3):161–71.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Almushait M, Ghani RA. Perceptiontoward non-pharmacological strategies in relieving labour pain: An analytical descriptive study. J Nat Sci Res.4(2):2014.
9.
Maputle MS, Nolte AWG. Mothers’ experience of labour in a tertiary care hospital. Health SA Gesondheid. 2008;13(1):55–62.CrossRef
10.
Maputle MS, Hiss DC. Experiences of midwives managing women during labour at a tertiary care hospital in the Limpopo Province. Curationis. 2010;33(3):5–14.CrossRef
11.
Schafheutle EI, Cantrill JA, Noyce PR. Why is pain management suboptimal on surgical wards? J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(6):728–37.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Tournaire M, Theau-Yonneau A. Complementary and alternative approaches to pain relief during labor. Evidence Based and Complementary Alternative Medicine. 2007;4(4):409–17.CrossRef
13.
Leeman L, Fontaine P, King V, Klein MC, Ratcliffe S. The nature and management of labour pain: part 1. Non-pharmacological pain relief. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(6):1109–13.PubMed
14.
Zwelling E, Johnson K, Allen J. How to implement complementary therapies for laboring women. American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing. 2006;31(6):364–70.CrossRef
15.
De Vos A, Strydom H, Fouche C, Delport C. Research at grassroots for the social sciences and human professions. 3rd ed. Pretoria: JL Van Schaick; 2011.
16.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2008.
17.
Hardon AP, Boonmongkon P, Streefland P, et al. Qualitative data collection techniques. In: Applied Health Research Manual: Anthropology of Health and Health Care, Module 17; 1994.
18.
Brink H. Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals. Juta: Cape Town; 2012.
19.
Iliadou M. Supporting women in labour. Health science. Journal. 2012;6(3):385–91.
20.
Persson EK, Dykes AK. Parents experience of early discharge from hospital after birth in Sweden. Midwifery. 2002;18:53–60.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bergstrom L, Richards L, Proctor A, Bohrer-Avila L, Morse JM, Roberts JE. Birth talk in second stage labor. Qual Health Res. 2009;19:954–64.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Bryanton J, Gagon AJ, Johnston C, Hatem M. Predictors of women’s perceptions of childbirth experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:24–34.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Rice PL. What women say about their childbirth experiences: the case of Hmong women in Australia. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 1999;17(3):237–53.CrossRef
24.
Gibbins J, Thomson AM. Women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery. 2001;17(4):302–13.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Brown H, Hofmeyr GJ, Nikodem VC, Smith H, Garner P. Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study. BioMedCentral Medicine. 2007:5–7.
26.
Myles PS, Urquhart N. The linearity of the visual analogue scale in patients with severe acute pain. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:54–8.PubMed
27.
Baker A, Ferguson SA, Roach GD, Dawson D. Perceptions of labour pain by mothers and attitudes of their midwives. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35:171–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Jensen MP, Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk DC, Meltzack R, editors. Handbook of pain assessment. New York: The Guilford press; 2001.
29.
Solomon P. Congruence between health professionals ‘and patients ‘pain ratings: a review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal Caring science. 2001;15:174–80.CrossRef
30.
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2007;18(3):CD003766.
31.
Teshome M, Abdella A, Kumbi S. Parturients' need of continuous labor support in labor wards. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2007;21(1):35–9.
32.
Mackey MC, Stepans ME. Women's evaluations of their labor and delivery nurses. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;23(5):413–20.CrossRef
33.
Lundgren I. Releasing and relieving encounters: experiences of pregnancy and childbirth. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18(4):368–75.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Sandall JSH, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD004667.
35.
Midmer DK. Does family-centered maternity care empower women? The development of the woman-centered childbirth model. Fam Med. 1992;24(3):216–21.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Support provided by midwives to women during labour in a public hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa: a participant observation study
Author
Maria S. Maputle
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1860-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Engaging pregnant women in observational research: a qualitative exploratory study

Research article

Vitamin D plasma concentrations in pregnant women and their preterm newborns

Research article

Associations between social capital and maternal depression: results from a follow-up study in China

Research article

The effect of uterine artery ligation in patients with central placenta pevia: a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review

Research article

Care quality following intrauterine death in Spanish hospitals: results from an online survey