Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

‘I didn’t think you were allowed that, they didn’t mention that.’ A qualitative study exploring women’s perceptions of home birth

Authors: Jo Naylor Smith, Beck Taylor, Karen Shaw, Alistair Hewison, Sara Kenyon

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests that home birth is as safe as hospital birth for low risk multiparous women, and is associated with reduced intervention rates and increased rates of normal birth. However the home birth rate in the UK is low, and few women choose this option. The aims of this study were to identify what influences multiparous women’s choice of birth place, and to explore their views of home birth.

Methods

Five focus groups were conducted with multiparous women (n = 28) attending mother and baby groups in a city in the UK with a diverse multi-ethnic population. Data were analysed thematically using the Framework Method, combining deductive and inductive approaches to the data.

Results

Several themes were developed from the data, these were: the expectation that birth would take place in an Obstetric Unit; perceptions of birth as a ‘natural’ event; lack of knowledge of what home birth looked like; and a lack of confidence in the reliability of the maternity service. Two themes emerged regarding the influences on women’s choices: clear information provision, particularly for those from ethnic minority groups, and the role of health care professionals. A final theme concerned women’s responses to the offer of choice.

Conclusions

There are gaps in women’s knowledge about the reality and practicalities of giving birth at home that have not been previously identified. Other findings are consistent with existing evidence, suggesting that many women still do not receive consistent, comprehensive information about home birth. The findings from this research can be used to develop approaches to meet women’s information and support needs, and facilitate genuine choice of place of birth.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. NICE guidelines [CG190]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. NICE guidelines [CG190]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, Linsell L, Macfarlane A, McCourt C, Marlow N, Miller A, Newburn M, Petrou S, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d7400.CrossRefPubMed Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, Linsell L, Macfarlane A, McCourt C, Marlow N, Miller A, Newburn M, Petrou S, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d7400.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2009;36(3):180–9.CrossRef Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2009;36(3):180–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kennare RM, Keirse MJ, Tucker GR, Chan AC. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes. Med J Aust. 2010;192(2):76–80.PubMed Kennare RM, Keirse MJ, Tucker GR, Chan AC. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes. Med J Aust. 2010;192(2):76–80.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schroeder E, Petrou S, Patel N, Hollowell J, Puddicombe D, Redshaw M, Brocklehurst P. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e2292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schroeder E, Petrou S, Patel N, Hollowell J, Puddicombe D, Redshaw M, Brocklehurst P. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e2292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6–7):377–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6–7):377–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Cumberlege J. Better Births. Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. A Five Year Forward View for maternity care. London: NHS; 2016. Cumberlege J. Better Births. Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. A Five Year Forward View for maternity care. London: NHS; 2016.
9.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2015. London: Office for National Statistics; 2016. Office for National Statistics. Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2015. London: Office for National Statistics; 2016.
10.
go back to reference MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Declerq E. Trends in Out-of-Hospital Births in the United States, 1990–2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2014(144):1-8. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Declerq E. Trends in Out-of-Hospital Births in the United States, 1990–2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2014(144):1-8.
11.
go back to reference Lindgren HE, Radestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751–9.CrossRefPubMed Lindgren HE, Radestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Better outcomes registry & network (BORN) Ontario. Annual report 2012–2013 and 2013–2014. Ottowa: BORN Ontario; 2015. Better outcomes registry & network (BORN) Ontario. Annual report 2012–2013 and 2013–2014. Ottowa: BORN Ontario; 2015.
13.
go back to reference Li ZZR, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Australia's mothers and babies 2011. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2013. Li ZZR, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Australia's mothers and babies 2011. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2013.
14.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Birth summary tables, England and Wales: 2014. London: Office for National Statistics; 2014. Office for National Statistics. Birth summary tables, England and Wales: 2014. London: Office for National Statistics; 2014.
15.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reconfiguration of Women's services in the UK. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2013. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reconfiguration of Women's services in the UK. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2013.
16.
go back to reference Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell J. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell J. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: Sage; 1998. Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: Sage; 1998.
18.
go back to reference Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.
19.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
20.
go back to reference Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society. 2014;16(1):51–67.CrossRef Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society. 2014;16(1):51–67.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ashley S, Weaver J. Factors influencing multiparous women who choose a home birth—a literature review. British Journal of midwifery. 2012;20(9):646–52.CrossRef Ashley S, Weaver J. Factors influencing multiparous women who choose a home birth—a literature review. British Journal of midwifery. 2012;20(9):646–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pitchforth E, van Teijlingen E, Watson V, Tucker J, Kiger A, Ireland J, Farmer J, Rennie AM, Gibb S, Thomson E, et al. "choice" and place of delivery: a qualitative study of women in remote and rural Scotland. Quality & safety in health care. 2009;18(1):42–8.CrossRef Pitchforth E, van Teijlingen E, Watson V, Tucker J, Kiger A, Ireland J, Farmer J, Rennie AM, Gibb S, Thomson E, et al. "choice" and place of delivery: a qualitative study of women in remote and rural Scotland. Quality & safety in health care. 2009;18(1):42–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hadjigeorgiou E, Kouta C, Papastavrou E, Papadopoulos I, Mårtensson LB. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review. Midwifery. 2012;28(3):380–90.CrossRefPubMed Hadjigeorgiou E, Kouta C, Papastavrou E, Papadopoulos I, Mårtensson LB. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review. Midwifery. 2012;28(3):380–90.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Edwards A. Place of birth: can ‘maternity matters’ really deliver choice? British Journal of Midwifery. 2008;16(12):771–5.CrossRef Edwards A. Place of birth: can ‘maternity matters’ really deliver choice? British Journal of Midwifery. 2008;16(12):771–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kightley R. Delivering choice: where to birth? British Journal of Midwifery. 2007;15(8):475–8.CrossRef Kightley R. Delivering choice: where to birth? British Journal of Midwifery. 2007;15(8):475–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Savage W. Birth and power. A savage enquiry revisited. London: Middlesex University Press; 2007. Savage W. Birth and power. A savage enquiry revisited. London: Middlesex University Press; 2007.
28.
go back to reference Murray-Davis B, McNiven P, McDonald H, Malott A, Elarar L, Hutton E. Why home birth? A qualitative study exploring women's decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces. Midwifery. 2012;28(5):576–81.CrossRefPubMed Murray-Davis B, McNiven P, McDonald H, Malott A, Elarar L, Hutton E. Why home birth? A qualitative study exploring women's decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces. Midwifery. 2012;28(5):576–81.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self-constructed choice in Finland. Social science & medicine (1982). 2001;52(7):1109–21.CrossRef Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self-constructed choice in Finland. Social science & medicine (1982). 2001;52(7):1109–21.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Houghton G, Bedwell C, Forsey M, Baker L, Lavender T. Factors influencing choice in birth place – an exploration of the views of women, their partners and professionals. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2008;6(2):59–64. Houghton G, Bedwell C, Forsey M, Baker L, Lavender T. Factors influencing choice in birth place – an exploration of the views of women, their partners and professionals. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2008;6(2):59–64.
31.
go back to reference Catling-Paull C, Dahlen H, Homer CS. Multiparous women's confidence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study. Women Birth. 2011;24(3):122–8.CrossRefPubMed Catling-Paull C, Dahlen H, Homer CS. Multiparous women's confidence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study. Women Birth. 2011;24(3):122–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Andrews A. Home birth experience 1: decision and expectation. Br J Midwifery. 2004;12(8):518–23.CrossRef Andrews A. Home birth experience 1: decision and expectation. Br J Midwifery. 2004;12(8):518–23.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Levy V. How midwives use protective steering to facilitate informed choice in pregnancy. In: Kirkham M, editor. Informed choice in maternity care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. p. 57–70. Levy V. How midwives use protective steering to facilitate informed choice in pregnancy. In: Kirkham M, editor. Informed choice in maternity care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. p. 57–70.
34.
go back to reference DiGirolamo AM, Grummer-Strawn LM, Fein SB. Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Suppl 2):S43–9.CrossRefPubMed DiGirolamo AM, Grummer-Strawn LM, Fein SB. Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Suppl 2):S43–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kruk ME, Paczkowski MM, Tegegn A, Tessema F, Hadley C, Asefa M, Galea S. Women's preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(11):984–8.CrossRefPubMed Kruk ME, Paczkowski MM, Tegegn A, Tessema F, Hadley C, Asefa M, Galea S. Women's preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(11):984–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference McNutt A, Thornton T, Sizer P, Curley A, Clarke P. Opinions of UK perinatal health care professionals on home birth. Midwifery. 2014;30(7):839–46.CrossRefPubMed McNutt A, Thornton T, Sizer P, Curley A, Clarke P. Opinions of UK perinatal health care professionals on home birth. Midwifery. 2014;30(7):839–46.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Vedam S, Stoll K, Schummers L, Fairbrother N, Klein MC, Thordarson D, Kornelsen J, Dharamsi S, Rogers J, Liston R, et al. The Canadian birth place study: examining maternity care provider attitudes and interprofessional conflict around planned home birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vedam S, Stoll K, Schummers L, Fairbrother N, Klein MC, Thordarson D, Kornelsen J, Dharamsi S, Rogers J, Liston R, et al. The Canadian birth place study: examining maternity care provider attitudes and interprofessional conflict around planned home birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Henshall C, Taylor B, Goodwin L, Farre A, Jones ME, Kenyon S. Improving the quality and content of midwives’ discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Midwifery. 2018;59:118–26.CrossRefPubMed Henshall C, Taylor B, Goodwin L, Farre A, Jones ME, Kenyon S. Improving the quality and content of midwives’ discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Midwifery. 2018;59:118–26.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference McCutcheon R, Brown D. A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2012;10(1):23–8. McCutcheon R, Brown D. A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2012;10(1):23–8.
41.
go back to reference Vedam S, Declercq ER, Monroe SM, Joseph J, Rubashkin N. The giving voice to mothers study: measuring respectful maternity Care in the United States [18Q]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:177S.CrossRef Vedam S, Declercq ER, Monroe SM, Joseph J, Rubashkin N. The giving voice to mothers study: measuring respectful maternity Care in the United States [18Q]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:177S.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Declercq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S. A. H: listening to mothers III: new mothers speak out. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2013. Declercq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S. A. H: listening to mothers III: new mothers speak out. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2013.
43.
go back to reference Noble A, Engelhardt K, Newsome-Wicks M, Woloski-Wruble AC. Cultural competence and ethnic attitudes of midwives concerning Jewish couples. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38(5):544–55.CrossRefPubMed Noble A, Engelhardt K, Newsome-Wicks M, Woloski-Wruble AC. Cultural competence and ethnic attitudes of midwives concerning Jewish couples. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38(5):544–55.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Luce A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Teijlingen E, Angell C. “Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luce A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Teijlingen E, Angell C. “Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2014. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2014.
Metadata
Title
‘I didn’t think you were allowed that, they didn’t mention that.’ A qualitative study exploring women’s perceptions of home birth
Authors
Jo Naylor Smith
Beck Taylor
Karen Shaw
Alistair Hewison
Sara Kenyon
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1733-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue