Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

“Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media

Authors: Ann Luce, Marilyn Cash, Vanora Hundley, Helen Cheyne, Edwin van Teijlingen, Catherine Angell

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Considerable debate surrounds the influence media have on first-time pregnant women. Much of the academic literature discusses the influence of (reality) television, which often portrays birth as risky, dramatic and painful and there is evidence that this has a negative effect on childbirth in society, through the increasing anticipation of negative outcomes. It is suggested that women seek out such programmes to help understand what could happen during the birth because there is a cultural void. However the impact that has on normal birth has not been explored.

Methods

A scoping review relating to the representation of childbirth in the mass media, particularly on television.

Results

Three key themes emerged: (a) medicalisation of childbirth; (b) women using media to learn about childbirth; and (c) birth as a missing everyday life event.

Conclusion

Media appear to influence how women engage with childbirth. The dramatic television portrayal of birth may perpetuate the medicalisation of childbirth, and last, but not least, portrayals of normal birth are often missing in the popular media. Hence midwives need to engage with television producers to improve the representation of midwifery and maternity in the media.
Literature
1.
Bick D. Media portrayal of birth and the consequences of misinformation. Midwifery. 2010;26(2):147–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Kennedy HP, Nardini K, McLeod-Waldo R, Ennis L. Top-selling childbirth advice books: A discourse analysis. Birth. 2009;36(4):318–24.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Kline KN. Midwife attended births in prime-time television: Craziness, controlling bitches, and ultimate capitulation. Women Lang. 1997;30(1):20–9.
5.
Sears CA, Godderis R. Roar like a Tiger on TV? Feminist Media Stud. 2011;11(2):181–95.CrossRef
6.
Morris T, McInerney K. Media representations of pregnancy and childbirth: An analysis of reality television programs in the United States. Birth. 2010;37(2):134–40.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Song FW, West JE, Lundy L, Dahmen NS. Women, Pregnancy, and Health Information Online: The making of informed patients and ideal mothers. Gender Soc. 2012;26:773–98.CrossRef
8.
VandeVusse A. A baby story as a source of information about childbirth: The messages and their implications. Boston: Paper presented at the annual meeting American Sociological Association Annual Meeting; 2008.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Hundley V, Luce A, van Teijlingen E. Do midwives need to be more media savvy? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2015;25(1):5–10.
13.
Barnett C, Hundley V, Cheyne H, Kane F. “Not in labour” – the impact of being sent home in the latent phase. Br J Midwifery. 2008;16(3):144–53.CrossRef
14.
Cheyne H, Terry R, Niven C, Dowding D, Hundley V, et al. Should I come in now?’ A qualitative investigation of how women’s experiences in early labour influence their decision of when to go to hospital. Br J Midwifery. 2007;15(10):604–26.CrossRef
15.
Kutulas J. Do I look like a chick?: Men, Women, and Babies on Sitcom Maternity Stories. Am Stud. 1998;39(2):13–32.
16.
Lacey N. Media Institutions and Audiences: Key Concepts in Media Studies. New York: Palgrave; 2002.CrossRef
17.
Halloran JD. The social effects of television. In: The Effects of Television. London: Panther Books; 1970. p. 25–68.
18.
Valkenburg PM. Children’s Responses to the Screen. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004.
19.
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
20.
Jones K. Mission Drift in Qualitative Research, or Moving Toward a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies, Moving back to a more systematic narrative review. Qual Rep. 2004;9(1):95–112.
21.
Barroso J, Gollop CJ, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ. The Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25(2):153–78.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
MacLean E. What to expect when you’re expecting? Representations of birth in British newspapers. Br J Midwifery. 2014;22(8):580–8.CrossRef
24.
Kline KN. Poking fun at midwifery on prime-time television: The rhetorical implications of burlesque frames in humorous shows. Women Lang. 2010;33(1):53–71.
25.
Apple RD. Constructing mothers: Scientific motherhood in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In: Apple RD, Golden J, editors. Mothers and Motherhood: Readings in American History. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press; 1997. p. 90–110.
26.
27.
Shallow H. The Caesarean Section Debate: Reclaiming Childbirth: Some thoughts from a midwife. Midwifery Matters. 2004;101:13–4.
28.
Bak C. Cultural lack of birth experience empowers media representations, not women. Midwifery Today. 2004;Winter(72):44-45 & 65.
29.
Rink LE. "Even more scared": The effects of reality childbirth shows on young women's perceptions of birth. (Unpublished BA Thesis). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2012.
30.
Murray S, Ouellette L. Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. New York: New York University Press; 2009.
31.
32.
Kitzinger S, Kitzinger J. Sheila Kitzinger’s and Jenny Kitzinger’s Letter from Europe: Childbirth & Breastfeeding in the British Media. Birth. 2001;28(1):60–1.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Health & Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics: NHS Maternity Statistics 2012-13. London: Health & Social Care Information Centre; 2013.
34.
Downe S, McCormick C, Beech BL. Labour interventions associated with normal birth. Br J Midwifery. 2001;9(10):602–6.CrossRef
35.
Haken C. Staging labour: An analysis of representations of childbirth on contemporary British television, (Unpublished MA Thesis). Bournemouth: Bournemouth University; 2006.
36.
VandeVusse A, VandeVusse L. Reality Television As a Source of Information About Birth; the Messages and their Implications. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008;53(5):482.CrossRef
37.
Stoll K, Hall W. Vicarious birth experiences and childbirth fear: Does it matter how young Canadian women learn about birth. J Perinat Educ. 2013;22(4):226–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Stoll K, Hall W, Janssen P, Carty E. Why are young Canadians afraid of birth? A survey of childbirth fear and birth preferences among Canadian University Students. Midwifery. 2014;30:220–6.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Wlodarczyk J. Cross-Cultural Delivery: The American Influence on Representations of Birth in Polish Popular Culture. Genders On-Line J. 2013;58:Fall.
40.
Holdsworth-Taylor T. Portrayals of childbirth: An examination of Internet Media. Interdiscipl J Health Sci. 2010;1(1):31–43.
41.
Talbot R. Self-efficacy: women’s experiences of pain in labour. Br J Midwifery. 2012;20(5):317–21.CrossRef
42.
Bor SE. Lucy's two babies: framing the first televised depiction of pregnancy. Media Hist. 2013;19(4):464–78.CrossRef
43.
Robotham M. We must stop the distorted vision of birth in the media. Br J Midwifery. 2001;9(5):288.CrossRef
44.
Williams G, Fahy K. Whose interests are served by the portrayal of childbearing women in popular magazines for women? Aus Midwifery J. 2004;17(1):11–6.CrossRef
45.
McIntyre MJ, Francis K, Chapman Y. Shaping public opinion on the issue of childbirth; a critical analysis of articles published in an Australian newspaper. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1):47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Hine G. The Changing Shape of Pregnancy in New Zealand Women's Magazines: 1970–2008. Feminist Media Stud. 2013;13(4):575–92.CrossRef
47.
Handfield B, Turnbull S, Bell RJ. What do obstetricians think about media influences on their patients? Aus N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(5):379–83.CrossRef
48.
Longhurst R. YouTube: a new space for birth? Feminist Rev. 2009;93:46–63.CrossRef
49.
Theroux R. Media as a source of information on pregnancy and childbirth. Nurs Womens Health. 2011;15(1):62–7.CrossRefPubMed
50.
51.
Young D. Childbirth education, the internet, and reality television: Challenges ahead. Birth. 2010;37:2.
52.
Schmid V. The need to re-conceptualize birth and harmonise the technological and biological. In: Donna S, editor. Promoting Normal Birth, Reflections and Guidelines. Chester Le Street: Fresh Heart Publishing; 2011. p. 139–49.
53.
Moffat JF. Mass Media Influence on First-Time Mothers. (Unpublished MA Thesis). Lubbock: Texas Tech University; 1980.
54.
McQuail D. Audience Analysis. London: Sage Publications Inc; 1997.
55.
Becker S. Marxist Approaches to Media Studies. Crit Stud Media Comm. 1984;1(1):66–80.
56.
57.
Temple M. The British Press. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008.
58.
MacKenzie Bryers H, van Teijlingen E. Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 2010;26:488–96.CrossRefPubMed
59.
60.
61.
Johanson R, Newburn M, Macfarlane A. Has the medicalization of childbirth gone too far? Br Med J. 2002;324(7342):892–5.CrossRef
62.
Hundley V. Early labour - should we be telling women to stay at home? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2013;23(3):337–40.
63.
Robotham M. Fast and Furious: childbirth on TV. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2000;10(1):77–8.
64.
Stephens RL. Socially Soothing Stories? Gender, Race and Class in TLC’s A Wedding Story and A Baby Story. In: Holmes S, Jermyn D, editors. Understanding Reality Television. London: Routledge; 2004. p. 191–210.
65.
Kingdon C. Mental Health & Illness. In: Deery R, Denny E, Letherby G, editors. Sociology for Midwives. Polity Press: Cambridge; 2015. p. 225–43.
66.
Lupton D. Precious, Pure, Uncivilised, Vulnerable: Infant Embodiment in Australian Popular Media. Children Soc. 2013;28(5):341–51.CrossRef
67.
Gauntlett D, Hill A. TV Living. London: Routledge; 1999.
68.
Dahlen H. Working with the media: The good, the bad and the funny. Essentially MIDIRS. 2015;6(2):14–8.
Metadata
Title
“Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media
Authors
Ann Luce
Marilyn Cash
Vanora Hundley
Helen Cheyne
Edwin van Teijlingen
Catherine Angell
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0827-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Signal functions for measuring the ability of health facilities to provide abortion services: an illustrative analysis using a health facility census in Zambia

Research article

Amniotic fluid embolism as a cause of maternal mortality in China between 1996 and 2013: a population-based retrospective study

Research article

Experiences and preferences of care among Swedish immigrants following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect in the fetus: a qualitative interview study

Research article

Prevalence and incidence of domestic violence during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a longitudinal cohort study in the south of Sweden

Research article

Coping with worry while waiting for diagnostic results: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples following a high-risk prenatal screening result

Study protocol

Group based prenatal care in a low-and high risk population in the Netherlands: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial