Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

How do informal information sources influence women’s decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

Authors: Ruth A. Sanders, Kenda Crozier

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Women approach birth using various methods of preparation drawing from conventional healthcare providers alongside informal information sources (IIS) outside the professional healthcare context. An investigation of the forms in which these informal information sources are accessed and negotiated by women, and how these disconnected and often conflicting elements influence women’s decision-making process for birth have yet to be evaluated. The level of antenatal preparedness women feel can have significant and long lasting implications on their birth experience and transition into motherhood and beyond. The aim of this study was to provide a deeper understanding of how informal information sources influence women’s preparation for birth.

Methods

Seven electronic databases were searched with predetermined search terms. No limitations were imposed for year of publication. English language studies using qualitative methods exploring women’s experiences of informal information sources and their impact upon women’s birth preparation were included, subject to a quality appraisal framework. Searches were initiated in February 2016 and completed by March 2016. Studies were synthesised using an interpretive meta-ethnographic approach.

Results

Fourteen studies were included for the final synthesis from Great Britain, Australia, Canada and the United States. Four main themes were identified: Menu Birth; Information Heaven/Hell; Spheres of Support; and Trust. It is evident that women do not enter pregnancy as empty vessels devoid of a conceptual framework, but rather have a pre-constructed embodied knowledge base upon which other information is superimposed. Allied to this, it is clear that informal information was sought to mitigate against the widespread experience of discordant information provided by maternity professionals.

Conclusion

Women’s access to the deluge of informal information sources in mainstream media during pregnancy have significant impact on decision making for birth. These informal sources redefine the power dynamic between women and maternal healthcare providers, simultaneously increasing levels of anxiety and challenging women’s pre-existing ideations and aspirations of personal birth processes. A lack of awareness by some professionals of women’s information seeking behaviours generates barriers to women-centred support, leaving an experience expectation mismatch unchecked.

Trial registration

CRD42016041491 17/06/16.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] Intrapartum Care Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Clinical Guideline 190, Methods, evidence and recommendations. 2014; National Institute for Health & Care Excellence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] Intrapartum Care Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Clinical Guideline 190, Methods, evidence and recommendations. 2014; National Institute for Health & Care Excellence.
2.
go back to reference World Health Organization. World health report 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva: Switzerland; 2005. World Health Organization. World health report 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva: Switzerland; 2005.
3.
go back to reference Grimes H, Forster D, Newton M. Sources of information used by women during pregnancy to meet their information needs. Midwifery. 2014;30:e26–33.CrossRefPubMed Grimes H, Forster D, Newton M. Sources of information used by women during pregnancy to meet their information needs. Midwifery. 2014;30:e26–33.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S. Listening to mothers II: report of the second National U.S. survey of Women’s childbearing experiences: conducted January-February 2006 for childbirth connection by Harris interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International. J Perinat Educ. 2007;16(4):15–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S. Listening to mothers II: report of the second National U.S. survey of Women’s childbearing experiences: conducted January-February 2006 for childbirth connection by Harris interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International. J Perinat Educ. 2007;16(4):15–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Sandall J. Every woman needs a midwife, and some women need a doctor too. Birth. 2012;39(4):323–6.CrossRefPubMed Sandall J. Every woman needs a midwife, and some women need a doctor too. Birth. 2012;39(4):323–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Say R, Robson S, Thomson R. Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Say R, Robson S, Thomson R. Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Lundgren I, Berg M. Central concepts in the midwife–woman relationship. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21:220–8.CrossRefPubMed Lundgren I, Berg M. Central concepts in the midwife–woman relationship. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21:220–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Baumann A, Dauber R. Decision-making and problem solving in nursing: an overview and analysis of relevant literature. Toronto: Literature Review Monograph. Toronto University; 1989. Baumann A, Dauber R. Decision-making and problem solving in nursing: an overview and analysis of relevant literature. Toronto: Literature Review Monograph. Toronto University; 1989.
10.
go back to reference Edwards A, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making in health care. Oxford: Oxford University press; 2009. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making in health care. Oxford: Oxford University press; 2009.
11.
go back to reference Beck C, Driscoll J, Watson S. Traumatic childbirth: Routledge; 2013. Beck C, Driscoll J, Watson S. Traumatic childbirth: Routledge; 2013.
13.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijze M, Korstjens I, de Jonge A, de Vries R & Lagro-Janssen A. On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014, 14:223, pg 1471–2393. Nieuwenhuijze M, Korstjens I, de Jonge A, de Vries R & Lagro-Janssen A. On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014, 14:223, pg 1471–2393.
14.
go back to reference Dugas M, Shorten A, Dubé E. Decision aid tools to support women’s decision making in pregnancy and birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1968–78.CrossRefPubMed Dugas M, Shorten A, Dubé E. Decision aid tools to support women’s decision making in pregnancy and birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1968–78.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Noseworthy D, Phibbs S, Benn C. Towards a relational model of decision- making in midwifery care. Midwifery. 2013;29:e42–8.CrossRefPubMed Noseworthy D, Phibbs S, Benn C. Towards a relational model of decision- making in midwifery care. Midwifery. 2013;29:e42–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Maier B. Antenatal group care in a midwifery group practice-a Midwife’s perspective. Women & Birth. 2013;26:87–9.CrossRef Maier B. Antenatal group care in a midwifery group practice-a Midwife’s perspective. Women & Birth. 2013;26:87–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bergstrom M, Keiler H, Waldenstrom U. Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BJOG. 2009;116:1167–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bergstrom M, Keiler H, Waldenstrom U. Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BJOG. 2009;116:1167–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women & Birth. 2013;26:e5–8.CrossRef Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women & Birth. 2013;26:e5–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Koehn M. Childbirth education outcomes: an integrative review of the literature. J of Perinat Educat. 2002;11(3):10–9. Koehn M. Childbirth education outcomes: an integrative review of the literature. J of Perinat Educat. 2002;11(3):10–9.
20.
go back to reference Koehn M. Contemporary Women’s perceptions of childbirth education. J Perinat Educat. 2008;17(1):11–8.CrossRef Koehn M. Contemporary Women’s perceptions of childbirth education. J Perinat Educat. 2008;17(1):11–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Norling-Gustafsson A, Skaghammar K, Adolfsson A. Expectant parents’ experiences of parental education within the antenatal health service. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2011;4:159–67.PubMedPubMedCentral Norling-Gustafsson A, Skaghammar K, Adolfsson A. Expectant parents’ experiences of parental education within the antenatal health service. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2011;4:159–67.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Lagan B, Marlene Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. Internet use in pregnancy informs Women’s decision making: a web-based survey. Birth. 2010;37(2):106–15.CrossRefPubMed Lagan B, Marlene Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. Internet use in pregnancy informs Women’s decision making: a web-based survey. Birth. 2010;37(2):106–15.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Trotter MI, Morgan DW. Patients’ use of the internet for health related matters: a study of internet usage in 2000 and 2006. Health Informatics J. 2008;14:175–81.CrossRefPubMed Trotter MI, Morgan DW. Patients’ use of the internet for health related matters: a study of internet usage in 2000 and 2006. Health Informatics J. 2008;14:175–81.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Larsson MA. Descriptive study of the use of the internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery. 2009;25(1):14–20.CrossRefPubMed Larsson MA. Descriptive study of the use of the internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery. 2009;25(1):14–20.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Carolan M. Health literacy and the information needs and dilemmas of first-time mothers over 35 years. J Clinical. Nursing. 2007;16:1162–72. Carolan M. Health literacy and the information needs and dilemmas of first-time mothers over 35 years. J Clinical. Nursing. 2007;16:1162–72.
27.
go back to reference Flemming S, Vandermause R, Shaw M. First-time mother’s preparing for birthing in an electronic world: internet and mobile telephone technology. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2014;32(3):240–53.CrossRef Flemming S, Vandermause R, Shaw M. First-time mother’s preparing for birthing in an electronic world: internet and mobile telephone technology. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2014;32(3):240–53.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study. Birth. 2011;38(4):336–45.CrossRefPubMed Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study. Birth. 2011;38(4):336–45.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Reid B, Sinclair M, Barr O, Dobbs F, Crealey G. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women’s decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for down syndrome. Soc Sci Med. 2009:1561–73. Reid B, Sinclair M, Barr O, Dobbs F, Crealey G. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women’s decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for down syndrome. Soc Sci Med. 2009:1561–73.
31.
go back to reference Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M. Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Services Research and Policy. 2002;17(4):209–15.CrossRef Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M. Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Services Research and Policy. 2002;17(4):209–15.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. 1988; Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. 1988;
33.
go back to reference Jensen L, Allen M. Meta- synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res, 1996. 1996;4(4):349–69.CrossRef Jensen L, Allen M. Meta- synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res, 1996. 1996;4(4):349–69.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2013;22(10):1435–43.CrossRef Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2013;22(10):1435–43.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] (2012) Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance (third edition). Appendix H Quality appraisal checklist – qualitative studies. National Institute for Health & Care Excellence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] (2012) Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance (third edition). Appendix H Quality appraisal checklist – qualitative studies. National Institute for Health & Care Excellence.
37.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):1–2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):1–2.
38.
go back to reference Weston C, Anderson JL. Internet use in pregnancy. Br J Midwifery. 2014;22(7):488–93.CrossRef Weston C, Anderson JL. Internet use in pregnancy. Br J Midwifery. 2014;22(7):488–93.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Miller A. “Midwife to myself”: birth narratives among women choosing unassisted homebirth. Sociol Inq. 2009;79(1):51–74.CrossRef Miller A. “Midwife to myself”: birth narratives among women choosing unassisted homebirth. Sociol Inq. 2009;79(1):51–74.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Regan M, McElroy K, Moore K. Choice? Factors that influence Women’s decision making for childbirth. J Perinat Educat. 2013;22(3):171–80.CrossRef Regan M, McElroy K, Moore K. Choice? Factors that influence Women’s decision making for childbirth. J Perinat Educat. 2013;22(3):171–80.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Song FW, West JE, Lundy L, Smith-Dahmen N. Women, pregnancy, and health information online: the making of informed patients and ideal mothers. Gender. Society. 2012;26(5):773–98. Song FW, West JE, Lundy L, Smith-Dahmen N. Women, pregnancy, and health information online: the making of informed patients and ideal mothers. Gender. Society. 2012;26(5):773–98.
44.
go back to reference Fenwick J, Hauck Y, Downie J, Butt J. The childbirth expectations of a self-selecting cohort of western Australian women. Midwifery. 2005;21:23–35.CrossRefPubMed Fenwick J, Hauck Y, Downie J, Butt J. The childbirth expectations of a self-selecting cohort of western Australian women. Midwifery. 2005;21:23–35.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Fenwick J, Staff L, Gambe J, Creedy D, Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010;26:394–400.CrossRefPubMed Fenwick J, Staff L, Gambe J, Creedy D, Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010;26:394–400.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Rodger D, Skuse A, Wilmore M, Humphreys S, Dalton J, Flabouris M, Clifton VL. Pregnant women’s use of information and communications technologies to access pregnancy-related health information in South Australia. Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):308–12.CrossRefPubMed Rodger D, Skuse A, Wilmore M, Humphreys S, Dalton J, Flabouris M, Clifton VL. Pregnant women’s use of information and communications technologies to access pregnancy-related health information in South Australia. Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):308–12.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Seibold C. Young single women’s experience of pregnancy, adjustment, decision-making and ongoing identity construction. Midwifery. 2004;20:171–80.CrossRefPubMed Seibold C. Young single women’s experience of pregnancy, adjustment, decision-making and ongoing identity construction. Midwifery. 2004;20:171–80.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Munro S. Decision making in patient-initiated elected cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories. J Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2009;54(5):373–9.CrossRef Munro S. Decision making in patient-initiated elected cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories. J Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2009;54(5):373–9.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Bjelke M, Martinsson A-K, Lendahls L, Marie Oscarsson M. Using the internet as a source of information during pregnancy — a descriptive cross-sectional study in Sweden. Midwifery. 2016;40:187–91.CrossRefPubMed Bjelke M, Martinsson A-K, Lendahls L, Marie Oscarsson M. Using the internet as a source of information during pregnancy — a descriptive cross-sectional study in Sweden. Midwifery. 2016;40:187–91.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Declercq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Listening to mothers III: pregnancy and birth. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2013. Declercq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Listening to mothers III: pregnancy and birth. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2013.
Metadata
Title
How do informal information sources influence women’s decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
Authors
Ruth A. Sanders
Kenda Crozier
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1648-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue