Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis

Authors: Martine Hollander, Esteriek de Miranda, Jeroen van Dillen, Irene de Graaf, Frank Vandenbussche, Lianne Holten

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. Until now there were no qualitative data on women’s motivations for these choices in the Dutch maternity care system where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options in low risk pregnancies. We aimed to examine women’s motivations for birthing outside the system in order to provide medical professionals with insight and recommendations regarding their interactions with women who have birth wishes that go against medical advice.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative research design with a constructivist approach and a grounded theory method were used. In-depth interviews were performed with 28 women on their motivations for going against medical advice in choosing a high risk childbirth setting. Open, axial and selective coding of the interview data was done in order to generate themes. A focus group was held for a member check of the findings.

Results

Four main themes were found: 1) Discrepancy in the definition of superior knowledge, 2) Need for autonomy and trust in the birth process, 3) Conflict during negotiation of the birth plan, and 4) Search for different care. One overarching theme emerged that covered all other themes: Fear. This theme refers both to the participants’ fear (of interventions and negative consequences of their choices) and to the providers’ fear (of a bad outcome). Where for some women it was a positive choice, for the majority of women in this study the choice for a home birth in a high risk pregnancy or an unassisted childbirth was a negative one. Negative choices were due to previous or current negative experiences with maternity care and/or conflict surrounding the birth plan.

Conclusions

The main goal of working with women whose birthing choices do not align with medical advice should not be to coerce them into the framework of protocols and guidelines but to prevent negative choices.
Recommendations for maternity caregivers can be summarized as: 1) Rethink risk discourse, 2) Respect a woman’s trust in the birth process and her autonomous choice, 3) Have a flexible approach to negotiating the birth plan using the model of shared decision making, 4) Be aware of alternative delivery care providers and other sources of information used by women, and 5) Provide maternity care without spreading or using fear.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christiaens W, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, de Vries R. Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013;29(1):e1–8.CrossRefPubMed Christiaens W, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, de Vries R. Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013;29(1):e1–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hollander M, van Dillen J, Lagro-Janssen T, van Leeuwen E, Duijst W, Vandenbussche F. Women refusing standard obstetric care: maternal-fetal conflict or doctor-patient conflict? J Preg Child Health. 2016;3:2.CrossRef Hollander M, van Dillen J, Lagro-Janssen T, van Leeuwen E, Duijst W, Vandenbussche F. Women refusing standard obstetric care: maternal-fetal conflict or doctor-patient conflict? J Preg Child Health. 2016;3:2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cherry A. The detention, confinement, and incarceration of pregnant women for the benefit of fetal health. J Gender & L. 2007;16:147. Cherry A. The detention, confinement, and incarceration of pregnant women for the benefit of fetal health. J Gender & L. 2007;16:147.
4.
go back to reference Hickman A. Born (not so) free: legal limits on the practice of unassisted childbirth or freebirthing in the United States. Univ Minn Law Rev. 2010;94:5. Hickman A. Born (not so) free: legal limits on the practice of unassisted childbirth or freebirthing in the United States. Univ Minn Law Rev. 2010;94:5.
5.
go back to reference Holten L, de Miranda E. Women′s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk home birth: an exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system’. Midwifery. 2016;38:55–62.CrossRefPubMed Holten L, de Miranda E. Women′s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk home birth: an exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system’. Midwifery. 2016;38:55–62.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Plested M, Kirkham M. Risk and fear in the lived experience of birth without a midwife. Midwifery. 2016;38:29–34.CrossRefPubMed Plested M, Kirkham M. Risk and fear in the lived experience of birth without a midwife. Midwifery. 2016;38:29–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Offerhaus PM, Geerts C, de Jonge A, Hukkelhoven CW, Twisk JW, Lagro-Janssen AL. Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Offerhaus PM, Geerts C, de Jonge A, Hukkelhoven CW, Twisk JW, Lagro-Janssen AL. Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage publications; 2007. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage publications; 2007.
12.
go back to reference Scamell M, Alaszewski A. Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health Risk Society. 2012;14(2):207–21.CrossRef Scamell M, Alaszewski A. Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health Risk Society. 2012;14(2):207–21.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martyn C. Risky business: doctors' understanding of statistics. BMJ. 2014;349 Martyn C. Risky business: doctors' understanding of statistics. BMJ. 2014;349
15.
go back to reference Pel M, Heres MH, Hart AA, van der Veen F, Treffers PE. Provider-associated factors in obstetric interventions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Aug;61(2):129–34.CrossRefPubMed Pel M, Heres MH, Hart AA, van der Veen F, Treffers PE. Provider-associated factors in obstetric interventions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Aug;61(2):129–34.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Chadwick RJ, Foster D. Negotiating risky bodies: childbirth and negotiations of risk. Health Risk Society. 2013;00(00):1–16. Chadwick RJ, Foster D. Negotiating risky bodies: childbirth and negotiations of risk. Health Risk Society. 2013;00(00):1–16.
18.
go back to reference Feeley C, Burns E, Adams E, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth? A meta-thematic synthesis, part one. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2015;13:4–9. Feeley C, Burns E, Adams E, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth? A meta-thematic synthesis, part one. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2015;13:4–9.
19.
go back to reference Miller A. Midwife to myself: birth narratives among women choosing unassisted home birth. Sociol Inq. 2009;79:51–74.CrossRef Miller A. Midwife to myself: birth narratives among women choosing unassisted home birth. Sociol Inq. 2009;79:51–74.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lindgren H, Radestad I, Christensson K, Wally-Bystrom K, Hildingsson I. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery. 2010;26:163–72.CrossRefPubMed Lindgren H, Radestad I, Christensson K, Wally-Bystrom K, Hildingsson I. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery. 2010;26:163–72.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self- constructed choice in Finland. Social Sci Med. 2001;52(7):1109–21.CrossRef Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self- constructed choice in Finland. Social Sci Med. 2001;52(7):1109–21.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Boucher D, Bennett C, McFarlin B, Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2009;54:119–26.CrossRef Boucher D, Bennett C, McFarlin B, Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2009;54:119–26.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Murray-Davis B, McNiven P, McDonald H, Malott A, Elarar L, Hutton E. Why home birth? A qualitative study exploring women's decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces. Midwifery. 2012;28:576–81.CrossRefPubMed Murray-Davis B, McNiven P, McDonald H, Malott A, Elarar L, Hutton E. Why home birth? A qualitative study exploring women's decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces. Midwifery. 2012;28:576–81.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Symon A, Winter C, Donnan P, Kirkham M. Examining autonomy's boundaries: a follow up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery. Birth. 2010;37:280–7.CrossRefPubMed Symon A, Winter C, Donnan P, Kirkham M. Examining autonomy's boundaries: a follow up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery. Birth. 2010;37:280–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference King J, Moulton B. Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making. Am J Law Med. 2006;32(4):429–501.CrossRefPubMed King J, Moulton B. Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making. Am J Law Med. 2006;32(4):429–501.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Korstjens I, de Jonge A, de Vries R, Lagro-Janssen A. On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Korstjens I, de Jonge A, de Vries R, Lagro-Janssen A. On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Wickham S. Unassisted birth: listening and learning from the minority. Practising Midwife. 2008;11:4–5.PubMed Wickham S. Unassisted birth: listening and learning from the minority. Practising Midwife. 2008;11:4–5.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Symon A, Williams B, Adelasoye QA, Cheyne H. Nocebo and the potential harm of 'high risk' labelling: a scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(7):1518–29.CrossRefPubMed Symon A, Williams B, Adelasoye QA, Cheyne H. Nocebo and the potential harm of 'high risk' labelling: a scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(7):1518–29.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Jefford E, Jomeen J. “Midwifery abdication”: a finding from an interpretive study. Int J Childbirth. 2015;5(3):116–25.CrossRef Jefford E, Jomeen J. “Midwifery abdication”: a finding from an interpretive study. Int J Childbirth. 2015;5(3):116–25.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: an integrative review. Women Birth. 2016 Apr;29(2):107–16.CrossRefPubMed Healy S, Humphreys E, Kennedy C. Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: an integrative review. Women Birth. 2016 Apr;29(2):107–16.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 14;16:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 14;16:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Lothian J. Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(2):295–303.CrossRefPubMed Lothian J. Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(2):295–303.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Jenkinson B, Kruske S, Stapleton H, Beckmann M, Reynolds M, Kildea S. Maternity care plans: a retrospective review of a process aiming to support women who decline standard care. Women and Birth. 2015;28:303–9.CrossRefPubMed Jenkinson B, Kruske S, Stapleton H, Beckmann M, Reynolds M, Kildea S. Maternity care plans: a retrospective review of a process aiming to support women who decline standard care. Women and Birth. 2015;28:303–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Mei JY, Afshar Y, Gregory KD, Kilpatrick SJ, Esakoff TF. Birth plans: what matters for birth experience satisfaction. Birth. 2016;43(2):144–50.CrossRefPubMed Mei JY, Afshar Y, Gregory KD, Kilpatrick SJ, Esakoff TF. Birth plans: what matters for birth experience satisfaction. Birth. 2016;43(2):144–50.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference DeBaets AM. From birth plan to birth partnership: enhancing communication in childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):31.e1–4.CrossRef DeBaets AM. From birth plan to birth partnership: enhancing communication in childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):31.e1–4.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Keedle H, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen HG. Women’s reasons for, and experience of, choosing a home birth following a caesarean sction. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keedle H, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen HG. Women’s reasons for, and experience of, choosing a home birth following a caesarean sction. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Gaskin IM. Spiritual midwifery 4th revised ed. 2002. Book Company Publishing. Gaskin IM. Spiritual midwifery 4th revised ed. 2002. Book Company Publishing.
40.
go back to reference Gaskin IM. Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth. 2008. Ebury Publishing. Gaskin IM. Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth. 2008. Ebury Publishing.
41.
go back to reference Shanley LK. Unassisted Childbirth. 3rd Ed. 2016. Bergin & Garvey. Shanley LK. Unassisted Childbirth. 3rd Ed. 2016. Bergin & Garvey.
42.
go back to reference Vadeboncoeur H. Birthing normally after a caesarean or two. 2011. Fresh Heart Publishing. Vadeboncoeur H. Birthing normally after a caesarean or two. 2011. Fresh Heart Publishing.
43.
go back to reference Dahlen HG, Jackson M, Stevens J. Home birth, freebirth and doulas: casualties and consequences of a broken system. Women Birth. 2011;24(1):47–50.CrossRefPubMed Dahlen HG, Jackson M, Stevens J. Home birth, freebirth and doulas: casualties and consequences of a broken system. Women Birth. 2011;24(1):47–50.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Green JM, Renfrew MJ, Curtis PA. Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2000;16:186–96.CrossRefPubMed Green JM, Renfrew MJ, Curtis PA. Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2000;16:186–96.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Cheyney M. Home birth as systems-challenging praxis: knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:254–67.CrossRefPubMed Cheyney M. Home birth as systems-challenging praxis: knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:254–67.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Porter ME, Olmsted Teisber E. Redefining Health Care. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2006. Porter ME, Olmsted Teisber E. Redefining Health Care. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2006.
Metadata
Title
Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis
Authors
Martine Hollander
Esteriek de Miranda
Jeroen van Dillen
Irene de Graaf
Frank Vandenbussche
Lianne Holten
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue