Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Women’s reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section

Authors: Hazel Keedle, Virginia Schmied, Elaine Burns, Hannah G Dahlen

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Caesarean section is rising in the developed world and vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is declining. There are increased reports of women seeking a homebirth following a caesarean section (HBAC) in Australia but little is known about the reasons for this study aimed to explore women's reasons for and experiences of choosing a HBAC.

Methods

Twelve women participated in a semi-structured one-to-one interview. The interviews were digitally recorded, then transcribed verbatim. These data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

The overarching theme that emerged was ‘It’s never happening again’. Women clearly articulated why it [caesarean section] was never happening again under the following sub themes: ‘treated like a piece of meat’, ‘I was traumatised by it for years’, ‘you can smell the fear in the room’, ‘re-traumatised by the system’. They also described how it [caesarean section] was never happening again under the sub themes: ‘getting informed and gaining confidence’, ‘avoiding judgment through selective telling’, ‘preparing for birth’, ‘gathering support’ and ‘all about safety but I came first’. The women then identified the impact of their HBAC under the subthemes ‘I felt like superwoman’ and ‘there is just no comparison’.

Conclusions

Birth intervention may cause physical and emotional trauma that can have a significant impact on some women. Inflexible hospital systems and inflexible attitudes around policy and care led some women to seek other options. Women report that achieving a HBAC has benefits for the relationship with their baby. VBAC policies and practices in hospitals need to be flexible to enable women to negotiate the care that they wish to have.
Literature
1.
Li Z, Zeki R, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Australia's mothers and babies 2011. In: Perinatal statistics. Canberra: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit; 2013.
2.
Cunnigham F, Bangdiwala S, Brown SS, Dean TM, Frederiksen M, Rowland Hogue CJ, et al. National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. In: National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference. vol. 115: Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010. p. 1279–95.
3.
NSW Health. New South Wales Mothers and Babies 2010. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2012.
4.
Latendresse G, Murphy PA, Fullerton JT. A description of the management and outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean birth in the homebirth setting. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005;50(5):386–91.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Stamilio DM, Defranco E, Pare E, Odibo A, Peipert J, Allsworth J, et al. Short Interpregnancy Interval. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1075–82.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Crowther C, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS, et al. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Silver R, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–32.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y. Believing in birth - choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs. 2006;16:1561–70.CrossRef
9.
Meddings F, Phipps FM, Haith-Cooper M, Haigh J. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women’s perceptions. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(1):160–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Fawsitt CG, Bourke J, Greene RA, Everard CM, Murphy A, Lutomski JE. At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Thomson GD S. Changing the future to change the past: women’s experience of a positive birth following a traumatic birth experience. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2010;28(1):102–12.CrossRef
13.
Beck CT. A metaethnography of traumatic childbirth and its aftermath: amplifying causal looping. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(3):301–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Yang YTMM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. Med Care. 2009;47(2):234–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1656–62.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Laws P, Li Z, Sullivan EA. Australia’s mothers and babies 2008. Canberra: AIHW; 2010.
17.
Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, Halliday J, et al. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean secion: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2010;117:1358–65.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fitzpatrick K, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: A National Case–control Study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Algert CS, Morris JM, Simpson JM, Ford JB, Roberts CL. Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1061–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Ophir E, Odeh M, Hirsch Y, Bornstein J. Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction’s methods. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(11):734–45.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Beckmann L, Barger M, Dorin L, Metzing S, Hellmers C. Vaginal birth after cesarean in german out-of-hospital settings: maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with their second child. Birth. 2014;41(4):309–15.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(6–7):377–83.CrossRef
23.
Lieberman E, Ernst EK, Rooks JP, Stapleton S, Flamm B. Results of the national study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centres. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5):933–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kennare R, Keirse MJNC, Tucker GR, Chan AC. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991–2006: differences in outcomes. MJA. 2009;192(2):76–80.
25.
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Alasuutari P, Bickman L, Brannen J. Qualitative interviewing and feminist research. In: The SAGE handbook of social research methods. edn. Sydney: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2008. p. 328–43.CrossRef
27.
Dankoski M. What makes research feminist? J Fem Fam Ther. 2000;12(1):3–19.CrossRef
28.
Burns E, Fenwick J, Schmied V, Sheehan A. Reflexivity in midwifery research: the insider/outsider debate. Midwifery. 2012;28:52–60.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Hesse-Biber SL PL. Feminist research practice. New York: SAGE publications; 2007.CrossRef
30.
31.
Eriksson. PK, A. Feminist Research. In Qualitative Methods in Business Research. edn. London: SAGE Publications; 2008: 245–275.
32.
Elmir R, Schmied V, Jackson D, Wilkes L. Interviewing people about potentially sensitive topics. Nurse Res. 2011;19(1):12–6.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: and analytic tool for qualitiative research. Qual Res. 2001;1(3):385–405.CrossRef
34.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
35.
Bryman A. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
36.
Denzin NL Y. Handbook fo qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 2000.
37.
Fenwick J, Gamble J, Mawson J. Women’s experiences of Caesarean section and vaginal birth after Caesarean: a Birthrites initiative. Int J Nurs Pract. 2003;9:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Bruijn M. Why birth trauma is unspoken: most of us don’t even know we’ve experienced it! Birth Matters. 2008;12(3):12–5.
39.
Elmir R, Schmied, V, Wilkes L, Jackson D. Women’s perception and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography. J Adv Nurs. 2010, Jan: Review Paper:2142–2153.
40.
Forssen AS. Lifelong significance of disempowering experiences in prenatal and maternity care: interviews with elderly Swedish women. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(11):1535–46.CrossRefPubMed
41.
World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research; 2014.
42.
Lee AS, Kirkman M. Disciplinary discourses: rates of cesarean section explained by medicine, midwifery, and feminism. Health Care Women Int. 2008;29(5):448–67.CrossRefPubMed
43.
O'Connell R, Downe S. A metasynthesis of midwives' experience of hospital practice in publicly funded settings: compliance, resistance and authenticity. Health. 2009;13(6):589–609.PubMed
44.
Keating A, Fleming VE. Midwives' experiences of facilitating normal birth in an obstetric-led unit: a feminist perspective. Midwifery. 2009;25(5):518–27.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Stewart M. Feminisms and the body. In: Stewart M, editor. Pregnancy, birth and maternity care. edn. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2004. p. 200.
46.
Boucher D, Bennett C, McFarlin B, Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54(2):119–26.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Jackson M, Dahlen H, Schmied V. Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths. Midwifery. 2012;28(5):561–7.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Dahlen HG, Jackson M, Stevens J. Homebirth, freebirth and doulas: casualty and consequences of a broken maternity system. Women Birth. 2011;24(1):47–50.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Homer CS. Challenging midwifery care, challenging midwives and challenging the system. Women Birth. 2006;19(3):79–83.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Beckett K. Choosing Cesarean: feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States. Fem Theor. 2005;6(3):251–75.CrossRef
51.
52.
Dahlen H, Homer, C. Motherbirth or childbirth’? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery 2011;29(2): 167-73.
53.
Catling-Paull C, Dahlen H, Homer CS. Multiparous women's confidence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study. Women Birth. 2011;24(3):122–8.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Dahlen HG, Barclay LM, Homer CS. The novice birthing: theorising first-time mothers' experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia. Midwifery. 2010;26(1):53–63.CrossRefPubMed
55.
McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Lumley J, Farrell T, Oats J, et al. COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Tracy SK, Hartz D, Hall B, Allen J, Forti A, Lainchbury A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Yuill O. Feminism as a theoretical perspective for research in midwifery. Br J Midwifery. 2012;20(1):36–40.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Women’s reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section
Authors
Hazel Keedle
Virginia Schmied
Elaine Burns
Hannah G Dahlen
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0639-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Low birth weight in a sub-urban area of Cameroon: an analysis of the clinical cut-off, incidence, predictors and complications

Research article

Classification of substandard factors in perinatal care: development and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement of the Groningen-system

Research article

A qualitative exploration of the emotional wellbeing and support needs of new mothers from Afghanistan living in Melbourne, Australia

Research article

Psychological, cultural and neuroendocrine profiles of risk for preterm birth

Research article

An international internet survey of the experiences of 1,714 mothers with a late stillbirth: the STARS cohort study

Study protocol

The Dutch Birth Centre Study: study design of a programmatic evaluation of the effect of birth centre care in the Netherlands