Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Exploring the intangible economic costs of stillbirth

Authors: Chidubem B. Ogwulu, Louise J. Jackson, Alexander E.P. Heazell, Tracy E. Roberts

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Compared to other pregnancy-related events, the full cost of stillbirth remains poorly described. In the UK one in every 200 births ends in stillbirth. As a follow-up to a recent study which explored the direct costs of stillbirth, this study aimed to explore the intangible costs of stillbirth in terms of their duration and economic implication.

Methods

Systematic searches identified relevant papers on the psychological consequences of stillbirth. A narrative review of the quantitative studies was undertaken. This was followed by a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography to identify over-arching themes common to the papers. Finally, the themes were used to generate questions proposed for use in a questionnaire to capture the intangible costs of stillbirth.

Results

The narrative review revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in couples with stillbirth compared to those without stillbirth. The qualitative synthesis identified a range of psychological effects common to families that have experienced stillbirth. Both methods revealed the persistent nature of these effects and the subsequent economic burden.

Conclusions

The psychological effects of stillbirth adversely impacts on the daily functioning, relationships and employment of those affected with far-reaching economic implications. Knowledge of the intangible costs of stillbirth is therefore important to accurately estimate the size of the impact on families and health services and to inform policy and decision making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Office for National Statistics. Child mortality statistics: childhood, infant and perinatal. Newport, UK: ONS; 2012.
3.
4.
Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen J, Smith G, Gibbons K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377:1331–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hughes P, Turton P, Evans C, Fainman D. Incidence, correlates and predictors of post traumatic stress disorder in the pregnancy after stillbirth. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:556–60.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Barr P, Cacciatore J. Personal fear of death and grief in bereaved mothers. Death Stud. 2008;32(5):445–60.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Hughes P, Riches S. Psychological aspects of perinatal loss. Curr Opinion Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(2):107–11.CrossRef
8.
Radestad I, Steineck G, Nordin C, Sjogren B. Psychological complications after stillbirth- influence of memories and immediate management: population based study. Br Med J. 1996;312:1505–8.CrossRef
9.
Turton P, Badenhorst W, Hughes P, Ward J, Riches S, White S. Psychological impact of stillbirths on fathers in the subsequent pregnancy and puerperium. Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:165-72.
10.
11.
Cacciatore J. Psychological effects of stillbirth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;18:76e82.CrossRef
12.
Fox M, Caciatore J, Lacasse J. Child death in the United States: productivity and the economic burden of parental grief. Death Stud. 2014;38(6-10):597–602.CrossRefPubMed
13.
DeFrain J, Martens L, Stork J, Stork W. The psychological effects of a stillbirth on surviving family members. Omega. 1990;22:81e108.
14.
15.
Dolan P, Loomes G, Peasgood J, Tsuchiya A. Estimating the intangible victim costs of violent crime. Brit J Criminal. 2005;45:958–76.CrossRef
16.
Luce R, Manning W, Siegel E, Lipscomb J. Estimating costs in cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Gold M, Siegel JE, Russell JE, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
17.
Liljas B. How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Tarricone R. Cost of illness analysis: what room in health economics? Health Policy. 2006;77:51–63.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart DL. Methods for the economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
20.
Guiness L, Wiseman V. Introduction to Health Economics (Understanding Public Health). Maidenhead: Open University Press. McGraw-Hill International; 2011.
21.
Gold M, Siegel JE, Russell JE, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
22.
Morris S, Delvin N, Parkin D. Economics analysis in health care. 1st ed. Chichester: Sons Ltd; 2007.
23.
Xie F, Thumboo J, Fong K, Lo N, Yeo S, Yang K, et al. A: study on indirect and intangible costs for patients with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore. Value Health. 2008;11 Suppl 1:S84–90.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Mistry H, Heazell A, Vincent O, Roberts T. A structured review and exploration of the healthcare costs associated with stillbirth and a subsequent pregnancy in England and Wales. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
26.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7), e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
Roberts T, Henderson J, Mugfod M, Bricker L, Neilson J, Garcia J. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness. BJOG. 2002;109:44–56.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003;65:671–84.CrossRef
31.
Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, et al. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(1):42–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies London: sage. 1988.
33.
Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta-ethnography to synthesize qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res. 2002;7:209–15.CrossRef
34.
35.
Harrison S, Apps L, Singh S, Steiner M, Morgan M, Robertson N. ‘Consumed by breathing’- a critical interpretive meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature. Chronic Illn. 2014;10(1):31–49.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Radestad I. Stillbirth: care and long-term psychological effects. Br J Midwifery. 2001;9:474–80.CrossRef
37.
Surkan P, Radestad I, Cnattingius S, Steineck G, Dickman P. Events after stillbirth in relation to maternal depressive symptoms: a brief report. Birth. 2008;35:2.CrossRef
38.
Turton P, Badenhorst W, Pawlby S, White S, Hughes P. Psychological vulnerability in children next-born after stillbirth: a case–control follow-up study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50(12):1451–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Turton P, Badenhorst W, Hughes P, Ward J, Riches S, White S. Psychological impact of stillbirths on fathers in the subsequent pregnancy and puerperium. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:165–72.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Saflund K, Wredling R. Differences within couples’ experience of their hospital care and well-being three months after experiencing a stillbirth. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2006;85:1193–9.CrossRef
42.
Cacciatore J, Bushfield S. Stillbirth:the mother’s experience and implications for improving care. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2007;3(3):59–79.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Cacciatore J. The unique experiences of women and their families after the death of a baby. Soc Work Health Care. 2010;49:134–48.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Samuelsson M, Radestad I, Segesten K. A waste of life: fathers’ experience of losing a child before birth. Birth. 2011;28:2.
45.
Erlandsson K, Avelin P, Säflund K, Wredling R, Rådestad I. Siblings’ farewell to a stillborn sister or brother and parents’ support to their older children: a questionnaire study from the parents’ perspective. J Child Health Care. 2010;14:151.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Avelin P, Erlandsson K, Hildingsson I, Radestad I. Swedish parents’ experiences of parenthood and the need for support to siblings when a baby is stillborn. Birth. 2011;38:2.CrossRef
47.
Avelin P, Radestad I, Saflund K, Wredling R, Erlandsson K. Parental grief and relationships after the loss of a stillborn baby. Midwifery. 2013;29:668–73.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Kelley M, Trinidad S. Silent loss and the clinical encounter: parents’ and physicians’ experiences of stillbirth–a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Murphy S. Reclaiming a moral identity: stillbirth, stigma and ‘moral mothers’. Midwifery. 2012;28:476–80.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Downe So, Schmidt E, Kingdon C, Heazell A. “Bereaved parents’ experience of stillbirth in UK hospitals: a qualitative interview study.” BMJ Open. 2013; 3(2).
51.
Trulsson O, Radestad I. The silent child—Mothers’ experiences before, during, and after stillbirth. Birth. 2004;31:3.CrossRef
52.
Yamazaki A. Living with stillborn babies as family members: Japanese women who experienced intrauterine fetal death after 28 weeks gestation. Health Care Women Int. 2010;10:921–37.CrossRef
53.
Bonnette S, Broom A. On grief, fathering and the male role in men’s accounts of stillbirth. J Sociol. 2012;48:248.CrossRef
54.
Cacciatore J, DeFrain J, Jones K, Jones H. Stillbirth and the couple: a gender-based exploration. J Fam Soc Work. 2008;11(4):351–72.CrossRef
55.
Lee L, McKenzie-McHarg K, Horsch A. Women’s decision making and experience of subsequent pregnancy following stillbirth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58:431–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
McFarlane A, Bookless C, Air T. Post traumatic stress disorder in a general psychiatric inpatient population. J Trauma Stress. 2001;14(4):633–45.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Gottlieb L, Lang A, Amsel R. The long-term effects of grief on marital intimacy following infant death. Omega. 1996;33(1):1–19.
58.
Lang A, Gouletb C, Amsel R. Explanatory model of health in bereaved parents post-fetal/infant death. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41:869–80.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Badenhorst N, Hughes P. Psychological aspects of perinatal loss. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(2):249–59.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Gold K, Sen A, Hayward R. Marriage and cohabitation outcomes after pregnancy loss. Pediatrics. 2010;125:1202–7.CrossRef
61.
Shreffler K, Hill P, Cacciatore J. Exploring the increased odds of divorce following miscarriage or stillbirth. J Divorce Remarriage. 2012;53(2):91–107.CrossRef
62.
Gottlieb L, Lang A, Cohen R. Coming to terms with infant death: changes that couples experience. Vancouver, BC: Paper presented at the International Nursing Research Conference; 1994.
63.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Late intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth (Green-top 55). 1st ed. London: RCOG; 2010.
64.
Janssen H, Cuisinier M, De Graw K. A Prospective study of risk factors predicting grief intensity following pregnancy loss. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54(1):56–61.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Walby S. The costs of domestic violence London: women and equality unit, National statistics. 2004.
66.
67.
Rice D, Hodgson T, Sinsheimer P, Browner W, Kopstein A. The economic costs of the health effects of smoking 1984. Milbank Q. 1986;64(4):489–547.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Beran R. The burden of epilepsy for the patient: the intangible costs. Epilepsia. 1999;40 Suppl 8:40–3.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Lubeck D. The costs of musculoskeletal disease: health needs assessment and health economics. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(3):529–39.CrossRefPubMed
70.
71.
Trisolini M, Honeycutt A, Wiener J, Lesesne S. Global economic impact of multiple sclerosis literature review prepared for multiple sclerosis International Federation London, United Kingdom. 2010.
Metadata
Title
Exploring the intangible economic costs of stillbirth
Authors
Chidubem B. Ogwulu
Louise J. Jackson
Alexander E.P. Heazell
Tracy E. Roberts
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0617-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Priorities and strategies for improving disabled women’s access to maternity services when they are affected by domestic abuse: a multi-method study using concept maps

Research article

When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally—a qualitative study

Research article

Explanatory factors for first and second-generation non-western women’s inadequate prenatal care utilisation: a prospective cohort study

Research article

Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers

Case report

What should we do to optimise outcome in twin pregnancy complicated with placenta percreta? A case report

Study protocol

The Dutch Birth Centre Study: study design of a programmatic evaluation of the effect of birth centre care in the Netherlands