Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Accuracy of seizure semiology obtained from first-time seizure witnesses

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Little is known of how accurately a first-time seizure witness can provide reliable details of a semiology. Our goal was to determine how accurately first-time seizure witnesses could identify key elements of an epileptic event that would aid the clinician in diagnosing a seizure.

Methods

A total of 172 participants over 17 years of age, with a mean (sd) of 33.12 (13.2) years and 49.4% female, composed of two groups of community dwelling volunteers, were shown two different seizure videos; one with a focal seizure that generalized (GSV), and the other with a partial seizure that did not generalize (PSV). Participants were first asked about what they thought was the event that had occurred. They then went through a history-taking scenario by an assessor using a battery of pre-determined questions about involvement of major regions: the head, eyes, mouth, upper limbs, lower limbs, or change in consciousness. Further details were then sought about direction of movement in the eyes, upper and lower limbs, the side of limb movements and the type of movements in the upper and lower limbs. Analysis was with descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results

One hundred twenty-two (71.4%) identified the events as seizure or epilepsy. The accuracy of identifying major areas of involvement ranged from 60 to 89.5%. Horizontal head movements were significantly more recognized in the PSV, while involvement of the eyes, lateralization of arm movement, type of left arm movement, leg involvement, and lateralization of leg movement were significantly more recognized in the GSV. Those shown the GSV were more likely to recognize the event as "seizure" or "epilepsy" than those shown the PSV; 78 (84.8%) vs 44 (55.7%), (OR 0.22, p < 0.0001). Younger age was also associated with correct recognition (OR 0.96, P 0.049). False positive responses ranged from 2.5 to 32.5%.

Conclusion

First-time witnesses can identify important elements more than by chance alone, and are more likely to associate generalized semiologies with seizures or epilepsy than partial semiologies. However, clinicians still need to navigate the witness’s account carefully for additional information since routine questioning could result in a misleading false positive answer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gavvala JR, Schuele SU. New-onset seizure in adults and adolescents: a review. JAMA. 2016;316:2657–68.CrossRefPubMed Gavvala JR, Schuele SU. New-onset seizure in adults and adolescents: a review. JAMA. 2016;316:2657–68.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rugg-Gunn FJ, Harrison NA, Duncan JS. Evaluation of the accuracy of seizure descriptions by the relatives of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2001;43:193–9.CrossRefPubMed Rugg-Gunn FJ, Harrison NA, Duncan JS. Evaluation of the accuracy of seizure descriptions by the relatives of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2001;43:193–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nowacki TA, Jirsch JD. Evaluation of the first seizure patient: key points in the history and physical examination. Seizure. 2017;49:54–63.CrossRefPubMed Nowacki TA, Jirsch JD. Evaluation of the first seizure patient: key points in the history and physical examination. Seizure. 2017;49:54–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Beghi E. Management of a first seizure. General conclusions and recommendations. Epilepsia. 2008;49(Suppl 1):58–61.CrossRefPubMed Beghi E. Management of a first seizure. General conclusions and recommendations. Epilepsia. 2008;49(Suppl 1):58–61.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kunze A, Reuber M. The first seizure as an indicator of epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:156–61.PubMed Kunze A, Reuber M. The first seizure as an indicator of epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:156–61.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Heo JH, Kim DW, Lee SY, Cho J, Lee SK, Nam H. Reliability of semiology description. Neurologist. 2008;14:7–11.CrossRefPubMed Heo JH, Kim DW, Lee SY, Cho J, Lee SK, Nam H. Reliability of semiology description. Neurologist. 2008;14:7–11.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Benbir G, Demiray DY, Delil S, Yeni N. Interobserver variability of seizure semiology between two neurologist and caregivers. Seizure. 2013;22:548–52.CrossRefPubMed Benbir G, Demiray DY, Delil S, Yeni N. Interobserver variability of seizure semiology between two neurologist and caregivers. Seizure. 2013;22:548–52.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ristic AJ, Draskovic M, Bukumiric Z, Sokic D. Reliability of the witness descriptions of epileptic seizures and psychogenic non-epileptic attacks: a comparative analysis. Neurol Res. 2015;37:560–2.CrossRefPubMed Ristic AJ, Draskovic M, Bukumiric Z, Sokic D. Reliability of the witness descriptions of epileptic seizures and psychogenic non-epileptic attacks: a comparative analysis. Neurol Res. 2015;37:560–2.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Thijs RD, Wagenaar WA, Middelkoop HA, Wieling W, van Dijk JG. Transient loss of consciousness through the eyes of a witness. Neurology. 2008;71:1713–8.CrossRefPubMed Thijs RD, Wagenaar WA, Middelkoop HA, Wieling W, van Dijk JG. Transient loss of consciousness through the eyes of a witness. Neurology. 2008;71:1713–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mannan JB, Wieshmann UC. How accurate are witness descriptions of epileptic seizures? Seizure. 2003;12:444–7.CrossRefPubMed Mannan JB, Wieshmann UC. How accurate are witness descriptions of epileptic seizures? Seizure. 2003;12:444–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Patihis L, Frenda SJ, LePort AK, Petersen N, Nichols RM, Stark CE, McGaugh JL, Loftus EF. False memories in highly superior autobiographical memory individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:20947–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patihis L, Frenda SJ, LePort AK, Petersen N, Nichols RM, Stark CE, McGaugh JL, Loftus EF. False memories in highly superior autobiographical memory individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:20947–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Pezdek K, Sperry K, Owens SM. Interviewing witnesses: the effect of forced confabulation on event memory. Law Hum Behav. 2007;31:463–78.CrossRefPubMed Pezdek K, Sperry K, Owens SM. Interviewing witnesses: the effect of forced confabulation on event memory. Law Hum Behav. 2007;31:463–78.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Haidet P, Paterniti DA. “Building” a history rather than “taking” one: a perspective on information sharing during the medical interview. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1134–40.CrossRefPubMed Haidet P, Paterniti DA. “Building” a history rather than “taking” one: a perspective on information sharing during the medical interview. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1134–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Smeets T, Candel I, Merckelbach H. Accuracy, completeness, and consistency of emotional memories. Am J Psychol. 2004;117:595–609.CrossRefPubMed Smeets T, Candel I, Merckelbach H. Accuracy, completeness, and consistency of emotional memories. Am J Psychol. 2004;117:595–609.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of seizure semiology obtained from first-time seizure witnesses
Publication date
01-12-2018
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1137-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Neurology 1/2018 Go to the issue