Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Healthcare resource use and costs of multiple sclerosis patients in Germany before and during fampridine treatment

Authors: Tjalf Ziemssen, Christine Prosser, Jennifer Scarlet Haas, Andrew Lee, Sebastian Braun, Pamela Landsman-Blumberg, Angela Kempel, Erika Gleißner, Sarita Patel, Ming-Yi Huang

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often suffer from gait impairment and fampridine is indicated to medically improve walking ability in this population. Patient characteristics, healthcare resource use, and costs of MS patients on fampridine treatment for 12 months in Germany were analyzed.

Methods

A retrospective claims database analysis was conducted including MS patients who initiated fampridine treatment (index date) between July 2011 and December 2013. Continuous insurance enrollment during 12 months pre- and post-index date was required, as was at least 1 additional fampridine prescription in the fourth quarter after the index date. Patient characteristics were evaluated and pre- vs post-index MS-related healthcare utilization and costs were compared.

Results

A total of 562 patients were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 50.5 (9.8) years and 63% were female. In the treatment period, almost every patient had at least 1 MS-related outpatient visit, 24% were hospitalized due to MS, and 79% utilized MS-specific physical therapy in addition to the fampridine treatment. Total MS-related healthcare costs were significantly higher in the fampridine treatment period than in the period prior to fampridine initiation (€17,392 vs €10,960, P < 0.001). While this difference was driven primarily by prescription costs, MS-related inpatient costs were lower during fampridine treatment (€1,333 vs €1,565, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Physical therapy is mainly used concomitant to fampridine treatment. While healthcare costs were higher during fampridine treatment compared to the pre-treatment period, inpatient costs were lower. Further research is necessary to better understand the fampridine influence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paltamaa J, Sarasoja T, Leskinen E, Wikstrom J, Malkia E. Measures of physical functioning predict self-reported performance in self-care, mobility, and domestic life in ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1649–57.CrossRefPubMed Paltamaa J, Sarasoja T, Leskinen E, Wikstrom J, Malkia E. Measures of physical functioning predict self-reported performance in self-care, mobility, and domestic life in ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1649–57.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Panitch H, Applebee A. Treatment of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: an unmet need for a disease-specific disability. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(10):1511–21.CrossRefPubMed Panitch H, Applebee A. Treatment of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: an unmet need for a disease-specific disability. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(10):1511–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zwibel HL. Contribution of impaired mobility and general symptoms to the burden of multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther. 2009;26(12):1043–57.CrossRefPubMed Zwibel HL. Contribution of impaired mobility and general symptoms to the burden of multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther. 2009;26(12):1043–57.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Van Asch P. Impact of mobility impairment in multiple sclerosis 2-patients’ perspectives. Eur Neurol Rev. 2011;6(2):115–20.CrossRef Van Asch P. Impact of mobility impairment in multiple sclerosis 2-patients’ perspectives. Eur Neurol Rev. 2011;6(2):115–20.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Larocca NG. Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: perspectives of patients and care partners. Patient. 2011;4(3):189–201.CrossRefPubMed Larocca NG. Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: perspectives of patients and care partners. Patient. 2011;4(3):189–201.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Andersohn F, Walker J. Characteristics and external validity of the German Health Risk Institute (HRI) Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(1):106–9.CrossRefPubMed Andersohn F, Walker J. Characteristics and external validity of the German Health Risk Institute (HRI) Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(1):106–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (German Neurological Society). Diagnose und therapie der multiplen sklerose. 2014. Leitlinie S2e. AWMF-Registernummer: 030/050 2014. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (German Neurological Society). Diagnose und therapie der multiplen sklerose. 2014. Leitlinie S2e. AWMF-Registernummer: 030/050 2014.
9.
go back to reference Hoer A, Schiffhorst G, Zimmermann A, Fischaleck J, Gehrmann L, Ahrens H, Carl G, Sigel KO, Osowski U, Klein M, et al. Multiple sclerosis in Germany: data analysis of administrative prevalence and healthcare delivery in the statutory health system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:381.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoer A, Schiffhorst G, Zimmermann A, Fischaleck J, Gehrmann L, Ahrens H, Carl G, Sigel KO, Osowski U, Klein M, et al. Multiple sclerosis in Germany: data analysis of administrative prevalence and healthcare delivery in the statutory health system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:381.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Bonafede MM, Johnson BH, Wenten M, Watson C. Treatment patterns in disease-modifying therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis in the United States. Clin Ther. 2013;35(10):1501–12.CrossRefPubMed Bonafede MM, Johnson BH, Wenten M, Watson C. Treatment patterns in disease-modifying therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis in the United States. Clin Ther. 2013;35(10):1501–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Flachenecker P, Stuke K, Elias W, Freidel M, Haas J, Pitschnau-Michel D, Schimrigk S, Zettl UK, Rieckmann P. Multiple sclerosis registry in Germany: results of the extension phase 2005/2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105(7):113–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Flachenecker P, Stuke K, Elias W, Freidel M, Haas J, Pitschnau-Michel D, Schimrigk S, Zettl UK, Rieckmann P. Multiple sclerosis registry in Germany: results of the extension phase 2005/2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105(7):113–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Jara M, Sidovar MF, Henney HR. Prescriber utilization of dalfampridine extended release tablets in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective pharmacy and medical claims analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:1–7.PubMed Jara M, Sidovar MF, Henney HR. Prescriber utilization of dalfampridine extended release tablets in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective pharmacy and medical claims analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:1–7.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Prescott JD, Factor S, Pill M, Levi GW. Descriptive analysis of the direct medical costs of multiple sclerosis in 2004 using administrative claims in a large nationwide database. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13(1):44–52.PubMed Prescott JD, Factor S, Pill M, Levi GW. Descriptive analysis of the direct medical costs of multiple sclerosis in 2004 using administrative claims in a large nationwide database. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13(1):44–52.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Healthcare resource use and costs of multiple sclerosis patients in Germany before and during fampridine treatment
Authors
Tjalf Ziemssen
Christine Prosser
Jennifer Scarlet Haas
Andrew Lee
Sebastian Braun
Pamela Landsman-Blumberg
Angela Kempel
Erika Gleißner
Sarita Patel
Ming-Yi Huang
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0844-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Neurology 1/2017 Go to the issue