Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Acute Kidney Injury | Research article

Urea reduction ratio may be a simpler approach for measurement of adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis in acute kidney injury

Authors: Kelly V. Liang, Jane H. Zhang, Paul M. Palevsky

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Assessment of adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is conventionally based upon urea kinetic models for calculation of single pool Kt/Vurea (Kt/V), with 1.2 accepted as minimum adequate clearance for thrice weekly IHD. In the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) Study, adequacy of IHD in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) was assessed using Kt/V. However, equations for Kt/V require volume of distribution of urea, which is highly variable in AKI. Therefore, simpler methods are needed to assess adequacy of IHD in AKI. We assessed correlation of urea reduction ratio (URR) with Kt/V and determined URR thresholds corresponding to Kt/V values to determine if URR could be a simpler means to assess the delivered dose of IHD.

Methods

Using patients who received IHD for 2.5–6 h and with pre-dialysis BUN ≥20 mg/dL, we plotted URR against Kt/V. We determined URR thresholds (0.60 to 0.75) corresponding to Kt/V ≥ 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. We generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for increasing URR values for each level of Kt/V to identify the corresponding thresholds of URR.

Results

There was strong correlation between URR and Kt/V. ROC curves comparing URR with Kt/V ≥ 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 had area under the curves (AUC) of 0.99. Sensitivity and specificity of URR ≥0.67 for corresponding values of Kt/V ≥ 1.2 were 0.769 (95% CI: 0.745 to 0.793) and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.997 to 1.000), respectively and the sensitivity and specificity of URR ≥0.67 for corresponding values of Kt/V ≥ 1.4 were 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 to 1.000) and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.771 to 0.811), respectively.

Conclusions

Targeting a URR ≥0.67 provides a simplified means of assessing adequacy of IHD in patients with AKI. Use of URR will enhance ability to assess delivery of small solute clearance and improve adherence with clinical practice guidelines in AKI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC. The peak concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1989;9:257–60.PubMed Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC. The peak concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1989;9:257–60.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:1574–81.PubMed Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:1574–81.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Clark WR, Mueller BA, Kraus MA, Macias WL. Dialysis prescription and kinetics in acute renal failure. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1997;4(2 Suppl 1):64–71.PubMed Clark WR, Mueller BA, Kraus MA, Macias WL. Dialysis prescription and kinetics in acute renal failure. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1997;4(2 Suppl 1):64–71.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(Suppl 6):10–4.PubMed Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(Suppl 6):10–4.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Keen ML. Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int Suppl. 2000;76:S3–S18.PubMed Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Keen ML. Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int Suppl. 2000;76:S3–S18.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kidney Disease. Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for Acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138. Kidney Disease. Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for Acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138.
7.
go back to reference VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network, Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O'Connor TZ, et al. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):7–20. VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network, Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O'Connor TZ, et al. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):7–20.
8.
go back to reference Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKT/V, and ePRCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995;2:295–304.PubMed Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKT/V, and ePRCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995;2:295–304.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4:1205–13.PubMed Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4:1205–13.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):649–72.PubMed Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):649–72.PubMed
11.
go back to reference National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(5):884–930. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(5):884–930.
12.
go back to reference Himmelfarb J, Evanson J, Hakim RM, Freedman S, Shyr Y, Ikizler TA. Urea volume of distribution exceeds total body water in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2002;61(1):317–23.PubMed Himmelfarb J, Evanson J, Hakim RM, Freedman S, Shyr Y, Ikizler TA. Urea volume of distribution exceeds total body water in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2002;61(1):317–23.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA. Quantitating urea removal in patients with acute renal failure: lost art or forgotten science? Semin Dial. 2000;13(3):147–9.PubMed Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA. Quantitating urea removal in patients with acute renal failure: lost art or forgotten science? Semin Dial. 2000;13(3):147–9.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kapoian T, Steward CA, Sherman RA. Validation of a revised slow-stop flow recirculation method. Kidney Int. 1997;52(3):839–42.PubMed Kapoian T, Steward CA, Sherman RA. Validation of a revised slow-stop flow recirculation method. Kidney Int. 1997;52(3):839–42.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Osterkamp LK. Current perspective on assessment of human body proportions of relevance to amputees. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95(2):215–8.PubMed Osterkamp LK. Current perspective on assessment of human body proportions of relevance to amputees. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95(2):215–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Clark WR, Mueller BA, Kraus MA, Macias WL. Renal replacement therapy quantification in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(Suppl 6):86–90.PubMed Clark WR, Mueller BA, Kraus MA, Macias WL. Renal replacement therapy quantification in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(Suppl 6):86–90.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Urea reduction ratio may be a simpler approach for measurement of adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis in acute kidney injury
Authors
Kelly V. Liang
Jane H. Zhang
Paul M. Palevsky
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1272-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Nephrology 1/2019 Go to the issue