Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

The value of non-invasive measurement of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance to categorize significant changes of intradialytic blood pressure: a prospective study

Authors: Yunlin Feng, Yurong Zou, Yifei Zheng, Nathan W. Levin, Li Wang

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Blood pressure (BP) is currently the main hemodynamic parameter used to assess the influence of fluid removal during hemodialysis session. Since BP is dependent on cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPRI), investigating these parameters may help to better understand the influence of fluid removal on patient’s hemodynamics. We used a novel non-invasive whole-body bio-impedance cardiography device, recently validated in hemodialysis patients, to examine mechanisms of intradialytic hemodynamics in a Chinese dialysis population.

Methods

Chronic hemodialysis patients in Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital were enrolled. Demographic data and dialysis prescriptions were collected. Hemodynamic measurements were made pre-treatment, every 20 min during treatment and immediately after treatment in each random dialysis session. These included blood pressure, cardiac index (CI), total peripheral resistance (TPRI) and cardiac power index (CPI). Patients were divided into 5 hemodynamic groups as per their major hemodynamic response to fluid removal: low CPI, low TPRI, high TPRI, High CPI and those with normal hemodynamics.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, with 12 (44.4%) males. The average age was 65 ± 12 y. The average body mass index (BMI) was 23.7 ± 3.9 kg/m2. 12 (44.4%) patients were diabetic. Three hundred twenty-four hemodynamic measurements were made. Weight, BMI, total fluid removal, pretreatment systolic BP, CI, TPRI and CI differed significantly among the 5 hemodynamic groups.11.1% of patients had low CPI, 25.9% had low TPRI, 18.5% had high CPI, 3.7% had high TPRI and 40.7% had normal hemodynamics. Hemodynamic differences among the 5 subgroups were significant.

Conclusion

This technology provides multi-dimensional insight into intradialytic hemodynamic parameters, which may be more informative than blood pressure only. Using hemodynamic parameters to describe patients’ status is more specific and accurate, and could help to work out specific and effective therapeutic actions according to underlying abnormalities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Handt A, Farber A, Szwed J. Intradialytic measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Clin Nephrol. 1977;7(2):61–4.PubMed Handt A, Farber A, Szwed J. Intradialytic measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Clin Nephrol. 1977;7(2):61–4.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Levin NW, de Abreu M, Borges LE, Tavares Filho HA, Sarwar R, Gupta S, Hafeez T, Lev S, Williams C. Hemodynamic response to fluid removal during hemodialysis: categorization of causes of intradialytic hypotension. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy048. Levin NW, de Abreu M, Borges LE, Tavares Filho HA, Sarwar R, Gupta S, Hafeez T, Lev S, Williams C. Hemodynamic response to fluid removal during hemodialysis: categorization of causes of intradialytic hypotension. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ndt/​gfy048.
3.
go back to reference Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Cohen AJ, Miller H, Goor D, Vered Z. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. Chest. 2004;125:1431–40.CrossRef Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Cohen AJ, Miller H, Goor D, Vered Z. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. Chest. 2004;125:1431–40.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Paredes OL, Shite J, Shinke T, Watanabe S, Otake H, Matsumoto D, Imuro Y, Ogasawara D, Sawada T, Yokoyama M. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation: reliability of wrist-to-ankle electrode configuration. Circ J. 2006;70:1164–8.CrossRef Paredes OL, Shite J, Shinke T, Watanabe S, Otake H, Matsumoto D, Imuro Y, Ogasawara D, Sawada T, Yokoyama M. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation: reliability of wrist-to-ankle electrode configuration. Circ J. 2006;70:1164–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Germain MJ, Joubert J, O'Grady D et al. Comparison of stroke volume measurements during hemodialysis using bioimpedance cardiography and echocardiography. Hemodial Int. 2018;22(2):201-08.CrossRef Germain MJ, Joubert J, O'Grady D et al. Comparison of stroke volume measurements during hemodialysis using bioimpedance cardiography and echocardiography. Hemodial Int. 2018;22(2):201-08.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cotter G, Schachner A, Sasson L, et al. Impedance cardiography revisited. Physiol Meas. 2006;27(9):817–27.CrossRef Cotter G, Schachner A, Sasson L, et al. Impedance cardiography revisited. Physiol Meas. 2006;27(9):817–27.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference N.I. MEDICAL, LTD. Bioimpedance cardiac analyzing measuring system. FDA 510k clearance No. K080941 June 18, 2009. N.I. MEDICAL, LTD. Bioimpedance cardiac analyzing measuring system. FDA 510k clearance No. K080941 June 18, 2009.
8.
go back to reference Du Bois D, Du bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916;17(6):863–71.CrossRef Du Bois D, Du bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916;17(6):863–71.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, et al. The role of cardiac power and systemic vascular resistance in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of patients with acute congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5(4):443–51.CrossRef Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, et al. The role of cardiac power and systemic vascular resistance in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of patients with acute congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5(4):443–51.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mary E. Lough. Hemodynamic Monitoring, Evolving Technologies and Clinical Practice ELSEVIER ISBN: 978–0–323-08512-0. Mary E. Lough. Hemodynamic Monitoring, Evolving Technologies and Clinical Practice ELSEVIER ISBN: 978–0–323-08512-0.
11.
go back to reference Wendi Bradshaw. The importance of mean arterial pressure as a patient assessment tool: in haemodialysis and acute care. Aust Nurs J. 2012;20(2):26–29. Wendi Bradshaw. The importance of mean arterial pressure as a patient assessment tool: in haemodialysis and acute care. Aust Nurs J. 2012;20(2):26–29.
12.
go back to reference Poulin A, Bellemare PL, Fortier C, et al. Acute effects of cinacalcet on arterial stiffness and ventricular function in hemodialysis patients: A randomized double-blinded crossover study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(21):e6912.CrossRef Poulin A, Bellemare PL, Fortier C, et al. Acute effects of cinacalcet on arterial stiffness and ventricular function in hemodialysis patients: A randomized double-blinded crossover study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(21):e6912.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ghigolea AB, Gherman-Caprioara M, Moldovan AR. Arterial stiffness: hemodialysis versus hemodiafiltration. Clujul Med. 2017;90(2):166–70.CrossRef Ghigolea AB, Gherman-Caprioara M, Moldovan AR. Arterial stiffness: hemodialysis versus hemodiafiltration. Clujul Med. 2017;90(2):166–70.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The value of non-invasive measurement of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance to categorize significant changes of intradialytic blood pressure: a prospective study
Authors
Yunlin Feng
Yurong Zou
Yifei Zheng
Nathan W. Levin
Li Wang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1087-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Nephrology 1/2018 Go to the issue