Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders by senior people - a focus group study

Authors: Vedrana Baric, Maria Andreassen, Annika Öhman, Helena Hemmingsson

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

New technologies such as mobile/smartphones have the potential to help senior people perform everyday activities. However, senior people may find it difficult using mobile/smartphones, especially the digital calendar and short text message features. Therefore, senior people might need user-friendly, flexible, and interactive digital calendars that provide them with active reminders about their everyday activities. This study focuses on community dwelling seniors’ experiences learning and using RemindMe, an interactive digital calendar with active reminders, as part of customizing an intervention appropriate for senior people with cognitive impairments.

Methods

Four focus groups were conducted with 20 community dwelling seniors (11 men and 9 women) who all had used RemindMe for six weeks. The focus groups were tape recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis.

Results

For participants in this study, using a calendar was an essential part of their everyday lives, but only a few had experiences using a digital calendar. Although the participants described RemindMe as easy to use, they had a difficult time incorporating RemindMe into their daily routines. In part, these difficulties were the result of the participants needing to change their mobile/smartphone routines. Some participants felt that using an interactive digital calendar was a sign of modernity allowing them to take part in the society at large, but others felt that their inability to use the technology was due to their age, dependence, and loss of function. Participants found that receiving active reminders through short text messages followed by actively acknowledging the reminder helped them perform more everyday life activities. This feature gave them a higher sense of independence and control.

Conclusions

Community dwelling seniors found that RemindMe was easy to learn and to use, although they also found it challenging to integrate into their everyday lives. For senior people to make the effort to develop new routines for mobile/smartphone use, a prerequisite for using a digital calendar, they need to be motivated and believe that the technology will make their lives better.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21:333–52.CrossRef Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21:333–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kurniawan S. Older people and mobile phones: a multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2008;66:889–901.CrossRef Kurniawan S. Older people and mobile phones: a multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2008;66:889–901.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lenno M, Brewster S, Evans JJ. The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):419–44.CrossRef Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lenno M, Brewster S, Evans JJ. The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):419–44.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boman I-L, Bartfai A, Borell L, Tham K, Hemmingsson H. Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:339–50.CrossRef Boman I-L, Bartfai A, Borell L, Tham K, Hemmingsson H. Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:339–50.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ferguson S, Friedland D, Woodberry E. Smartphone technology: gently reminders of everyday tasks for those with prospective memory difficulties post-brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29:583–91.CrossRef Ferguson S, Friedland D, Woodberry E. Smartphone technology: gently reminders of everyday tasks for those with prospective memory difficulties post-brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29:583–91.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Larsson Lund M, Lövgren-Engström AL, Lexell J. Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:402–11.CrossRef Larsson Lund M, Lövgren-Engström AL, Lexell J. Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:402–11.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference LoPresti EF, Simpson RC, Kirsch N, Schreckenghost D, Hayashi S. Distributed cognitive aid with scheduling and interactive task guidance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:505–22.CrossRef LoPresti EF, Simpson RC, Kirsch N, Schreckenghost D, Hayashi S. Distributed cognitive aid with scheduling and interactive task guidance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:505–22.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wong D, Wang QJ, Stolwyk R, Ponsford J. Do smartphones have the potential to support cognition and Independence following stroke? Brain Impairment. 2017;18:310–20.CrossRef Wong D, Wang QJ, Stolwyk R, Ponsford J. Do smartphones have the potential to support cognition and Independence following stroke? Brain Impairment. 2017;18:310–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seelye AM, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Das B, Cook DJ. Application of cognitive rehabilitation theory to the development of smart prompting technologies. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;5:29–44.CrossRef Seelye AM, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Das B, Cook DJ. Application of cognitive rehabilitation theory to the development of smart prompting technologies. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;5:29–44.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McDonald A, Haslam C, Yates P, Gurr B, Leeder G, Sayers A. Google calendar: a new memory aid to compensate for prospective memory deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2011;21:784–807.CrossRef McDonald A, Haslam C, Yates P, Gurr B, Leeder G, Sayers A. Google calendar: a new memory aid to compensate for prospective memory deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2011;21:784–807.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Joode E, Proot I, Sleger K, van Heugten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. The use of standard calendar software by individuals with acquired brain injury and cognitive complaints: a mixed method study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011:1–10. de Joode E, Proot I, Sleger K, van Heugten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. The use of standard calendar software by individuals with acquired brain injury and cognitive complaints: a mixed method study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011:1–10.
12.
go back to reference Hill R, Betts LR, Gardner SE. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:415–23.CrossRef Hill R, Betts LR, Gardner SE. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:415–23.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mitzner T, Boron J, Fausset C, Adams A, Charness N, Czaja S, Dijkstra K, Fisk A, Rogers W, Sharit J. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26:1710–21.CrossRef Mitzner T, Boron J, Fausset C, Adams A, Charness N, Czaja S, Dijkstra K, Fisk A, Rogers W, Sharit J. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26:1710–21.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:235–48.CrossRef Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJM. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:235–48.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chen K, Chan A. Use or non-use of gerontechnology – a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:4645–66.CrossRef Chen K, Chan A. Use or non-use of gerontechnology – a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:4645–66.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:624–35.CrossRef Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:624–35.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:112–6.CrossRef Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:112–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hong SG, Trimi S, Kim DW. Smartphone use and internet literacy of senior citizens. J Assist Technol. 2016;10:27–38.CrossRef Hong SG, Trimi S, Kim DW. Smartphone use and internet literacy of senior citizens. J Assist Technol. 2016;10:27–38.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schulze H. MEMOS: a Mobile extensible memory aids system. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10:233–41.CrossRef Schulze H. MEMOS: a Mobile extensible memory aids system. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10:233–41.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pijenborg GHM, Withaar FK, Brouwer W, Timmerman ME, van der Bosch RJ, Ecvans JJ. The efficacy of SMS text message to compensate for the effect of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010;49:259–74.CrossRef Pijenborg GHM, Withaar FK, Brouwer W, Timmerman ME, van der Bosch RJ, Ecvans JJ. The efficacy of SMS text message to compensate for the effect of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010;49:259–74.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bolic Baric V, Tegelström V, Ekblad E, Hemmingsson H. Usability of RemindMe – an interactive web-based mobile reminder calendar: a professionals perspective. In: Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 217: assistive technology; 2015. p. 685–8. Bolic Baric V, Tegelström V, Ekblad E, Hemmingsson H. Usability of RemindMe – an interactive web-based mobile reminder calendar: a professionals perspective. In: Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 217: assistive technology; 2015. p. 685–8.
22.
go back to reference Lancioni GE, Singh NN, editors. Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014. Lancioni GE, Singh NN, editors. Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014.
23.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
24.
go back to reference Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus-groups. A practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus-groups. A practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
26.
go back to reference Halkier B. Focus groups. (in Swedish). Malmö: Liber; 2010. Halkier B. Focus groups. (in Swedish). Malmö: Liber; 2010.
27.
go back to reference Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–12.CrossRef Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–12.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1989. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1989.
29.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research and methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
30.
go back to reference Hermerén G. Good research practice. Stockholm: The Swedish Research Council; 2011. Hermerén G. Good research practice. Stockholm: The Swedish Research Council; 2011.
33.
go back to reference Nimrod G. The hierarchy of mobile phone incorporation among older users. Mobile Media & Communication. 2016;4(2):149–68.CrossRef Nimrod G. The hierarchy of mobile phone incorporation among older users. Mobile Media & Communication. 2016;4(2):149–68.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Fritz H, Cutchin MP. Integrating the science of habit: opportunities for occupational therapy. OTJR. 2016;36:92–8.PubMed Fritz H, Cutchin MP. Integrating the science of habit: opportunities for occupational therapy. OTJR. 2016;36:92–8.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Payne SJ. Understanding calendar use. Human-Computer Interaction. 1993;8:83–100.CrossRef Payne SJ. Understanding calendar use. Human-Computer Interaction. 1993;8:83–100.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Mårtensson L, Archenholtz B. Occupational therapists’ perceptions of habits based on their professional experiences. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:151–9.CrossRef Mårtensson L, Archenholtz B. Occupational therapists’ perceptions of habits based on their professional experiences. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:151–9.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Säljö R. Learning in practice: a socio-cultural perspective (in Swedish). 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2014. Säljö R. Learning in practice: a socio-cultural perspective (in Swedish). 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2014.
Metadata
Title
Using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders by senior people - a focus group study
Authors
Vedrana Baric
Maria Andreassen
Annika Öhman
Helena Hemmingsson
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1128-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Geriatrics 1/2019 Go to the issue