Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Geriatrics
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Regional variation in healthcare spending and mortality among senior high-cost healthcare users in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective matched cohort study

Authors: Sergei Muratov, Justin Lee, Anne Holbrook, Andrew Costa, J. Michael Paterson, Jason R. Guertin, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Tara Gomes, Wayne Khuu, Jean-Eric Tarride

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Senior high cost health care users (HCU) are a priority for many governments. Little research has addressed regional variation of HCU incidence and outcomes, especially among incident HCU. This study describes the regional variation in healthcare costs and mortality across Ontario’s health planning districts [Local Health Integration Networks (LHIN)] among senior incident HCU and non-HCU and explores the relationship between healthcare spending and mortality.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective population-based matched cohort study of incident senior HCU defined as Ontarians aged ≥66 years in the top 5% most costly healthcare users in fiscal year (FY) 2013. We matched HCU to non-HCU (1:3) based on age, sex and LHIN. Primary outcomes were LHIN-based variation in costs (total and 12 cost components) and mortality during FY2013 as measured by variance estimates derived from multi-level models. Outcomes were risk-adjusted for age, sex, ADGs, and low-income status. In a cost-mortality analysis by LHIN, risk-adjusted random effects for total costs and mortality were graphically presented together in a cost-mortality plane to identify low and high performers.

Results

We studied 175,847 incident HCU and 527,541 matched non-HCU. On average, 94 out of 1000 seniors per LHIN were HCU (CV = 4.6%). The mean total costs for HCU in FY2013 were 12 times higher that of non-HCU ($29,779 vs. $2472 respectively), whereas all-cause mortality was 13.6 times greater (103.9 vs. 7.5 per 1000 seniors).
Regional variation in costs and mortality was lower in senior HCU compared with non-HCU. We identified greater variability in accessing the healthcare system, but, once the patient entered the system, variation in costs was low. The traditional drivers of costs and mortality that we adjusted for played little role in driving the observed variation in HCUs’ outcomes. We identified LHINs that had high mortality rates despite elevated healthcare expenditures and those that achieved lower mortality at lower costs. Some LHINs achieved low mortality at excessively high costs.

Conclusions

Risk-adjusted allocation of healthcare resources to seniors in Ontario is overall similar across health districts, more so for HCU than non-HCU. Identified important variation in the cost-mortality relationship across LHINs needs to be further explored.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Blumenthal D, Chernof B, Fulmer T, Lumpkin J, Selberg J. Caring for high-need, high-cost patients - an urgent priority. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):909–11.CrossRef
2.
Hayes SL, Salzberg CA, McCarthy D, et al. High-Need, High-Cost Patients: Who Are They and How Do They Use Health Care? A Population-Based Comparison of Demographics, Health Care Use, and Expenditures. Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund). 2016;26:1–14.
3.
Rais S, Nazerian A, Ardal S, Chechulin Y, Bains N, Malikov K. High-cost users of Ontario’s healthcare services. Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante. 2013;9(1):44–51.CrossRef
4.
Lee JY, Muratov S, Tarride J-E, Holbrook AM. Managing high-cost healthcare users: the international search for effective evidence-supported strategies. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(5):1002–8.CrossRef
5.
6.
Roos NP, Shapiro E, Tate R. Does a small minority of elderly account for a majority of health care expenditures? A sixteen-year perspective. The Milbank Quarterly. 1989;67(3–4):347–69.CrossRef
7.
Wodchis WP, Austin PC, Henry DA. A 3-year study of high-cost users of health care. Cmaj. 2016;188(3):182–8.CrossRef
8.
9.
Kim AM, Park JH, Kang S, Hwang K, Lee T, Kim Y. The effect of geographic units of analysis on measuring geographic variation in medical services utilization. J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(4):230–9.CrossRef
10.
Lougheed MD, Garvey N, Chapman KR, Cicutto L, Dales R, Day AG, Hopman WM, Lam M, Sears MR, Szpiro K, et al. The Ontario asthma regional variation study: emergency department visit rates and the relation to hospitalization rates. Chest. 2006;129(4):909–17.CrossRef
11.
Feasby TE, Quan H, Ghali WA. Geographic variation in the rate of carotid endarterectomy in Canada. Stroke. 2001;32(10):2417–22.CrossRef
12.
Feinberg AE, Porter J, Saskin R, Rangrej J, Urbach DR. Regional variation in the use of surgery in Ontario. CMAJ open. 2015;3(3):E310–6.CrossRef
13.
Hogan DB, Maxwell CJ, Fung TS, Ebly EM. Regional variation in the use of medications by older Canadians--a persistent and incompletely understood phenomena. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(7):575–82.CrossRef
14.
Morgan SG, Cunningham CM, Hanley GE. Individual and contextual determinants of regional variation in prescription drug use: an analysis of administrative data from British Columbia. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15883.CrossRef
15.
Newhouse JP, Garber AM, Graham RP, McCoy MA, Mancher M, Kibria A. Variation in health care spending: target decision making, not geography. In: Committee on geographic variation in health care spending and promotion of high-value care; board on health care services; institute of Medicine; 2013.
16.
Elliott S, Fisher M, David E, Wennberg M, Thrse A, Stukel P, Daniel J, Gottlieb MFL, Lucas P, Étoile L, Pinder M. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):288–98.CrossRef
17.
Fisher E, Goodman D, Skinner J, Bronner K. Health Care Spending, Quality, and Outcomes. The Dartmouth Insititute for Health Policy Research and Clinical Practice,  2009.
18.
Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder ÉL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):273–87.CrossRef
19.
Zuckerman SWT, Berenson R, Hadle J. Clarifying sources of geographic differences in Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:54–62.CrossRef
20.
Lavergne MR, Barer M, Law MR, Wong ST, Peterson S, McGrail K. Examining regional variation in health care spending in British Columbia, Canada. Health Policy. 2016;120(7):739–48.CrossRef
21.
Brooks GA, Li L, Uno H, Hassett MJ, Landon BE, Schrag D. Acute hospital care is the chief driver of regional spending variation in Medicare patients with advanced cancer. Health affairs (Project Hope). 2014;33(10):1793–800.CrossRef
22.
Ellis RP, Fiebig DG, Johar M, Jones G, Savage E. Explaining health care expenditure variation: large-sample evidence using linked survey and health administrative data. Health Econ. 2013;22(9):1093–110.CrossRef
23.
Bevan G: Using information on variation in rates of supply to questoin professional discretion in public services. 2004.
24.
Kephart G, Asada Y. Need-based resource allocation: different need indicators, different results? BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:122.CrossRef
25.
O'Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M, Evans T, Pardo Pardo J, Waters E, White H, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(1):56–64.CrossRef
26.
Struikmans H, Aarts MJ, Jobsen JJ, Koning CC, Merkus JW, Lybeert ML, Immerzeel J, Poortmans PM, Veerbeek L, Louwman MW, et al. An increased utilisation rate and better compliance to guidelines for primary radiotherapy for breast cancer from 1997 till 2008: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100(2):320–5.CrossRef
27.
Bierman AS, Shack AR, Johns A, for the POWER Study. Achieving health equity in Ontario: opportunities for intervention and improvement. In: Bierman AS, editor. Project for an Ontario Women’s health evidence-based report. Volume 2 ed. Toronto: St. Michael’s Hospital and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2012.
28.
Ohinmaa A, Zheng Y, Jeerakathil T, Klarenbach S, Hakkinen U, Nguyen T, Friesen D, Ruseski J, Kaul P, Ariste R, et al. Trends and regional variation in hospital mortality, length of stay and cost in Hospital of Ischemic Stroke Patients in Alberta accompanying the provincial reorganization of stroke care. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(12):2844–50.CrossRef
29.
30.
Allin S, Veillard J, Wang L, Grignon M. How can health system efficiency be improved in Canada? Healthcare Policy. 2015;11(1):33–45.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zhang Y, Baik SH, Fendrick AM, Baicker K. Comparing local and regional variation in health care spending. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(18):1724–31.CrossRef
32.
33.
Skinner J. Causes and consequences of regional variations in health care. In: Handbook of health economics, vol. 2011. Volume 2 ed. p. 45–93.
34.
Corallo AN, Croxford R, Goodman DC, Bryan EL, Srivastava D, Stukel TA. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy. 114(1):5–14.CrossRef
35.
Rosenberg BL, Kellar JA, Labno A, Matheson DH, Ringel M, VonAchen P, Lesser RI, Li Y, Dimick JB, Gawande AA, et al. Quantifying geographic variation in health care outcomes in the United States before and after risk-adjustment. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166762.CrossRef
36.
Muratov S, Lee J, Holbrook A, Paterson JM, Guertin JR, Mbuagbaw L, Gomes T, Khuu W, Pequeno P, Costa AP, et al. Senior high-cost healthcare users’ resource utilization and outcomes: a protocol of a retrospective matched cohort study in Canada. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018488.CrossRef
37.
Fitzpatrick T, Rosella LC, Calzavara A, Petch J, Pinto AD, Manson H, Goel V, Wodchis WP. Looking beyond income and education: socioeconomic status gradients among future high-cost users of health care. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2):161–71.CrossRef
38.
Rosella LC, Fitzpatrick T, Wodchis WP, Calzavara A, Manson H, Goel V. High-cost health care users in Ontario, Canada: demographic, socio-economic, and health status characteristics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:532.CrossRef
39.
40.
Wodchis WP, Bushmeneva K, Nikitovic M, McKillop I. Guidelines on person-level costing using administrative databases in Ontario. In: Working Paper Series, vol. 1. Toronto: Health System Performance Research Network; 2013.
41.
42.
43.
Kralj B. Measuring ‘rurality’ for purposes of health-care planning: an empirical measure for Ontario. Ont Med Rev. 2000;67(9):33–52.
44.
The Johns Hopkins ACG® System Version 10.0 Technical Reference Guide. In.: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2014.
45.
Gershon AS, Wang C, Guan J, Vasilevska-Ristovska J, Cicutto L, TO T. Identifying individuals with physcian diagnosed COPD in health administrative databases. Copd. 2009;6(5):388–94.CrossRef
46.
Schultz SE, Rothwell DM, Chen Z, Tu K. Identifying cases of congestive heart failure from administrative data: a validation study using primary care patient records. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2013;33(3):160–6.PubMed
47.
Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083–107.CrossRef
48.
Buntin MB, Zaslavsky AM. Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures. J Health Econ. 2004;23(3):525–42.CrossRef
49.
Liu L, Cowen ME, Strawderman RL, Shih Y-CT. A flexible two-part random effects model for correlated medical costs. J Health Econ. 2010;29(1):110–23.CrossRef
50.
Basu A, Manning WG, Mullahy J. Comparing alternative models: log vs cox proportional hazard? Health Econ. 2004;13(8):749–65.CrossRef
51.
Gregori D, Petrinco M, Bo S, Desideri A, Merletti F, Pagano E. Regression models for analyzing costs and their determinants in health care: an introductory review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23(3):331–41.CrossRef
52.
de Vries EF, Heijink R, Struijs JN, Baan CA. Unraveling the drivers of regional variation in healthcare spending by analyzing prevalent chronic diseases. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):323.CrossRef
53.
Liu L, Ma JZ, Johnson BA. A multi-level two-part random effects model, with application to an alcohol-dependence study. Stat Med. 2008;27(18):3528–39.CrossRef
54.
Tooze JA, Grunwald GK, Jones RH. Analysis of repeated measures data with clumping at zero. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002;11(4):341–55.CrossRef
55.
Austin PC, Merlo J. Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis. Stat Med. 2017;36(20):3257–77.CrossRef
56.
Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J R Soc Interface. 2017;14(134):20170213.CrossRef
57.
D’Errigo P, Tosti ME, Fusco D, Perucci CA, Seccareccia F. Use of hierarchical models to evaluate performance of cardiac surgery centres in the Italian CABG outcome study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:29.CrossRef
58.
MacKenzie TA, Grunkemeier GL, Grunwald GK, O'Malley AJ, Bohn C, Wu Y, Malenka DJ. A primer on using shrinkage to compare in-hospital mortality between centers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(3):757–61.CrossRef
59.
Hadley J, Reschovsky JD. Medicare spending, mortality rates, and quality of care. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012;12(1):87–105.CrossRef
60.
Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Cervellin G. No correlation between health care expenditure and mortality in the European Union. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;32:e13–4.CrossRef
61.
Gallet CA, Doucouliagos H. The impact of healthcare spending on health outcomes: a meta-regression analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2017;179:9–17.CrossRef
62.
Cohen D, Manuel DG, Tugwell P, Sanmartin C, Ramsay T. Does higher spending improve survival outcomes for myocardial infarction? Examining the cost-outcomes relationship using time-varying covariates. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(5):1589–605.CrossRef
63.
Stargardt T, Schreyogg J, Kondofersky I. Measuring the relationship between costs and outcomes: the example of acute myocardial infarction in German hospitals. Health Econ. 2014;23(6):653–69.CrossRef
64.
Stukel TA, Fisher ES, Alter DA, Guttmann A, Ko DT, Fung K, Wodchis WP, Baxter NN, Earle CC, Lee DS. Association of Hospital Spending Intensity with Mortality and Readmission Rates in Ontario hospitals. Jama. 2012;307(10):1037–45.CrossRef
65.
McKay NL, Deily ME. Comparing high- and low-performing hospitals using risk-adjusted excess mortality and cost inefficiency. Health Care Manag Rev. 2005;30(4):347–60.CrossRef
66.
Zhang M, Strawderman RL, Cowen ME, Wells MT. Bayesian inference for a two-part hierarchical model. J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(475):934–45.CrossRef
67.
Gebregziabher M, Egede L, Gilbert GE, Hunt K, Nietert PJ, Mauldin P. Fitting parametric random effects models in very large data sets with application to VHA national data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:163.CrossRef
68.
Health Analyst’s Toolkit. In.: Health Analytics Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2012.
Metadata
Title
Regional variation in healthcare spending and mortality among senior high-cost healthcare users in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective matched cohort study
Authors
Sergei Muratov
Justin Lee
Anne Holbrook
Andrew Costa
J. Michael Paterson
Jason R. Guertin
Lawrence Mbuagbaw
Tara Gomes
Wayne Khuu
Jean-Eric Tarride
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0952-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Geriatrics 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Hand grip strength as a physical biomarker of aging from the perspective of a Fibonacci mathematical modeling

Study protocol

The “more at home with dementia” program: a randomized controlled study protocol to determine how caregiver training affects the well-being of patients and caregivers

Research article

A frailty index derived from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts mortality and aged residential care admission

Research article

Anti-hypertensive medications and injurious falls in an older population of low socioeconomic status: a nested case-control study

Research article

Risk factors for incident falls in older men and women: the English longitudinal study of ageing

Research article

Community service provider perceptions of implementing older adult fall prevention in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits