Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Geriatrics
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research Article

Effects of computerized cognitive training on neuroimaging outcomes in older adults: a systematic review

Authors: Lisanne F. ten Brinke, Jennifer C. Davis, Cindy K. Barha, Teresa Liu-Ambrose

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Worldwide, the population is aging and the number of individuals diagnosed with dementia is rising rapidly. Currently, there are no effective pharmaceutical cures. Hence, identifying lifestyle approaches that may prevent, delay, or treat cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults is becoming increasingly important. Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) is a promising strategy to combat cognitive decline. Yet, the underlying mechanisms of the effect of CCT on cognition remain poorly understood. Hence, the primary objective of this systematic review was to examine peer-reviewed literature ascertaining the effect of CCT on both structural and functional neuroimaging measures among older adults to gain insight into the underlying mechanisms by which CCT may benefit cognitive function.

Methods

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we used the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers abstracted data using pre-defined terms. These included: main study characteristics such as the type of training (i.e., single- versus multi-domain), participant demographics (age ≥ 50 years; no psychiatric conditions), and the inclusion of neuroimaging outcomes. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess quality of all studies included in this systematic review.

Results

Nine studies were included in this systematic review, with four studies including multiple MRI sequences. Results of this systematic review are mixed: CCT was found to increase and decrease both brain structure and function in older adults. In addition, depending on region of interest, both increases and decreases in structure and function were associated with behavioural performance.

Conclusions

Of all studies included in this systematic review, results from the highest quality studies, which were two randomized controlled trials, demonstrated that multi-domain CCT could lead to increases in hippocampal functional connectivity. Further high quality studies that include an active control, a sample size calculation, and an appropriate training dosage, are needed to confirm these findings and their relation to cognition.
Literature
1.
2.
Polidori MC, Nelles G, Pientka L. Prevention of dementia: focus on lifestyle. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;2010:1–9.
3.
Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levalahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, Backman L, Hanninen T, Jula A, Laatikainen T, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9984):2255–63.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Valenzuela M, Sachdev PS. Harnessing brain and cognitive reserve for the prevention of dementia. Indian J Psychiatry. 2009;51(Suppl 1):S16–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Valenzuela MJ, Sachdev P. Brain reserve and dementia: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2006;36(4):441–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014;11(11):e1001756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Lampit A, Hallock H, Moss R, Kwok S, Rosser M, Lukjanenko M, et al. The timecourse of global cognitive gains from supervised computer-assisted cognitive training: a randomised, active-controlled trial in elderly with multiple dementia risk factors. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2014;1(1):33–9.
8.
Smith GE, Housen P, Yaffe K, Ruff R, Kennison RF, Mahncke HW, Zelinski EM. A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(4):594–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Basak C, Boot WR, Voss MW, Kramer AF. Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychol Aging. 2008;23(4):765–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Bruel-Jungerman E, Davis S, Laroche S. Brain plasticity mechanisms and memory: a party of four. Neuroscientist. 2007;13(5):492–505.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Citri A, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):18–41.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Guerra-Carrillo B, Mackey AP, Bunge SA. Resting-state fMRI: a window into human brain plasticity. Neuroscientist. 2014;20(5):522–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Olesen PJ, Westerberg H, Klingberg T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9. W264CrossRefPubMed
15.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–21.PubMed
16.
Lampit A, Hallock H, Suo C, Naismith SL, Valenzuela M. Cognitive training-induced short-term functional and long-term structural plastic change is related to gains in global cognition in healthy older adults: a pilot study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Lin ZC, Tao J, Gao YL, Yin DZ, Chen AZ, Chen LD. Analysis of central mechanism of cognitive training on cognitive impairment after stroke: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Int Med Res. 2014;42(3):659–68.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Rosen AC, Sugiura L, Kramer JH, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Gabrieli JD. Cognitive training changes hippocampal function in mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(Suppl 3):349–57.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Suo C, Singh MF, Gates N, Wen W, Sachdev P, Brodaty H, Saigal N, Wilson GC, Meiklejohn J, Singh N, et al. Therapeutically relevant structural and functional mechanisms triggered by physical and cognitive exercise. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;
20.
Antonenko D, Kulzow N, Cesarz ME, Schindler K, Grittner U, Floel A. Hippocampal pathway plasticity is associated with the ability to form novel memories in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Belleville S, Mellah S, de Boysson C, Demonet JF, Bier B. The pattern and loci of training-induced brain changes in healthy older adults are predicted by the nature of the intervention. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e102710.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Heinzel S, Lorenz RC, Brockhaus WR, Wustenberg T, Kathmann N, Heinz A, Rapp MA. Working memory load-dependent brain response predicts behavioral training gains in older adults. J Neurosci. 2014;34(4):1224–33.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Lovden M, Bodammer NC, Kuhn S, Kaufmann J, Schutze H, Tempelmann C, Heinze HJ, Duzel E, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(13):3878–83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Strenziok M, Parasuraman R, Clarke E, Cisler DS, Thompson JC, Greenwood PM. Neurocognitive enhancement in older adults: comparison of three cognitive training tasks to test a hypothesis of training transfer in brain connectivity. NeuroImage. 2014;85(Pt 3):1027–39.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
Dahlin E, Neely AS, Larsson A, Backman L, Nyberg L. Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science. 2008;320(5882):1510–2.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Mori S. Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2007.
28.
Mori S, Zhang J. Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron. 2006;51(5):527–39.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
31.
Kerchner GA, Racine CA, Hale S, Wilheim R, Laluz V, Miller BL, Kramer JH. Cognitive processing speed in older adults: relationship with white matter integrity. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Sexton CE, Kalu UG, Filippini N, Mackay CE, Ebmeier KP. A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(12):2322 e2325–18.CrossRef
33.
Bartzokis G. Alzheimer's disease as homeostatic responses to age-related myelin breakdown. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(8):1341–71.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, Reiss AL, Greicius MD. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007;27(9):2349–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
36.
Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(1):253–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Bai F, Watson DR, Yu H, Shi Y, Yuan Y, Zhang Z. Abnormal resting-state functional connectivity of posterior cingulate cortex in amnestic type mild cognitive impairment. Brain Res. 2009;1302:167–74.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Wang Z, Liang P, Jia X, Qi Z, Yu L, Yang Y, Zhou W, Lu J, Li K. Baseline and longitudinal patterns of hippocampal connectivity in mild cognitive impairment: evidence from resting state fMRI. J Neurol Sci. 2011;309(1–2):79–85.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zatorre RJ, Fields RD, Johansen-Berg H. Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(4):528–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Cheng Y, Wu W, Feng W, Wang J, Chen Y, Shen Y, Li Q, Zhang X, Li C. The effects of multi-domain versus single-domain cognitive training in non-demented older people: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2012;10:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Graham DP, Cully JA, Snow AL, Massman P, Doody R. The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale: normative data for older adult controls. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18(4):236–40.PubMed
42.
Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20(3):310–9.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Dwolatzky T, Whitehead V, Doniger GM, Simon ES, Schweiger A, Jaffe D, Chertkow H. Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr. 2003;3:4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Sahakian BJ, Owen AM. Computerized assessment in neuropsychiatry using CANTAB: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1992;85(7):399–402.PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Robbins TW, James M, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, McInnes L, Rabbitt P. Cambridge neuropsychological test automated battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia. 1994;5(5):266–81.PubMed
46.
Wechsler D. A standardized memory scale for clinical use. Aust J Psychol. 1945;19:87–95.CrossRef
47.
Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, Powers WJ, DeCarli C, Merino JG, Kalaria RN, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2220–41.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
49.
Willis SLM, M. Manual for the Everyday Problems Test. University Park: Pennsylvania State University; 1993.
50.
Schaie KW. Manual for the Schaie-Thurstone adult mental abilities test (STAMAT). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychological Press; 1985.
51.
Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale–revised: manual. San Antonio: Psychology Corporation; 1987.
52.
Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale—revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2009.
53.
Greenwood PM, Lambert C, Sunderland T, Parasuraman R. Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on spatial attention, working memory, and their interaction in healthy, middle-aged adults: results From the National Institute of Mental Health’s BIOCARD study. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(2):199–211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Parasuraman R, Greenwood PM, Kumar R, Fossella J. Beyond heritability: neurotransmitter genes differentially modulate visuospatial attention and working memory. Psychol Sci. 2005;16(3):200–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Floel A, Suttorp W, Kohl O, Kurten J, Lohmann H, Breitenstein C, Knecht S. Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(8):1682–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Helmstadter CL, M. & Lux S. Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest (VLMT), Manual. Göttingen: Belz-Test; 2001.
57.
Cohen JD, Perlstein WM, Braver TS, Nystrom LE, Noll DC, Jonides J, Smith EE. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature. 1997;386(6625):604–8.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Brickenkamp R. Test d2. The d2 test of attention. 9th ed. Goettingen: Hogrefe; 2002.
59.
Benton AH, K. Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates; 1989.
60.
Stroop JR. Studies of Interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643–62.CrossRef
61.
Raven J, Summer B, Birchfield M, Brosier G, Burciaga L, Bykrit B. Manual for raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Research supplement no. 3: a compendium of North American normative and validity studies. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press; 1990.
62.
Horn W: Leistungspruefsystem LPS, vol. Hogrefe, 2 edn. Goettingen: Germany; 1983.
Metadata
Title
Effects of computerized cognitive training on neuroimaging outcomes in older adults: a systematic review
Authors
Lisanne F. ten Brinke
Jennifer C. Davis
Cindy K. Barha
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0529-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Geriatrics 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research Article

Physical activity, body functions and disability among middle-aged and older Spanish adults

Research Article

Exergames versus self-regulated exercises with instruction leaflets to improve adherence during geriatric rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Renal function had an independent relationship with coronary artery calcification in Chinese elderly men

Study protocol

Development of a home-based training program for post-ward geriatric rehabilitation patients with cognitive impairment: study protocol of a randomized-controlled trail

Research Article

Integrated care at home reduces unnecessary hospitalizations of community-dwelling frail older adults: a prospective controlled trial

Research Article

Quality of care and quality of life of people with dementia living at green care farms: a cross-sectional study

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Cardiology Video

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Watch now

Watch official videos from the ACC congress summarizing key highlights from the last year in heart failure, cardiomyopathies, valvular disease, pulmonary vascular disease, and pediatric cardiology.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits