Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Assessing the economic burden of Alzheimer’s disease patients first diagnosed by specialists

Authors: Noam Y. Kirson, Urvi Desai, Ljubica Ristovska, Alice Kate G. Cummings, Howard G. Birnbaum, Wenyu Ye, J. Scott Andrews, Daniel Ball, Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is not known if there is a differential impact on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis and outcomes if/when patients are diagnosed with cognitive decline by specialists versus non-specialists. This study examined the cost trajectories of Medicare beneficiaries initially diagnosed by specialists compared to similar patients who received their diagnosis in primary care settings.

Methods

Patients with ≥2 claims for AD were selected from de-identified administrative claims data for US Medicare beneficiaries (5 % random sample). The earliest observed diagnosis of cognitive decline served as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous Medicare coverage for ≥12 months pre-index (baseline) and ≥12 months following the first AD diagnosis, allowing for up to 3 years from index to AD diagnosis. Time from index date to AD diagnosis was compared between those diagnosed by specialists (i.e., neurologist, psychiatrist, or geriatrician) versus non-specialists using Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests. Patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) during baseline, and annual all-cause medical costs (reimbursed by Medicare) in baseline and follow-up periods were compared across propensity-score matched cohorts.

Results

Patients first diagnosed with cognitive decline by specialists (n = 2593) were younger (78.8 versus 80.8 years old), more likely to be male (40 % versus 34 %), and had higher CCI scores and higher medical costs at baseline than those diagnosed by non-specialists (n = 13,961). However, patients diagnosed by specialists had a significantly shorter time to AD diagnosis, both before and after matching (mean [after matching]: 3.5 versus 4.6 months, p < 0.0001). In addition, patients diagnosed by specialists had significantly lower average total all-cause medical costs in the first 12 months after their index date, a finding that persisted after matching ($19,824 versus $25,863, p < 0.0001). Total per-patient annual medical costs were similar for the two groups starting in the second year post-index.

Conclusions

Before and after matching, patients diagnosed by a specialist had a shorter time to AD diagnosis and incurred lower costs in the year following the initial cognitive decline diagnosis. Differences in costs converged during subsequent years. This suggests that seeking care from specialists may yield more timely diagnosis, appropriate care and reduced costs among those with cognitive decline.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Gilden DM, Kubisiak JM, Wrobleski KK, Ball DE, Bowman L. Using U.S. Medicare records to evaluate the indirect health effects on spouses: a case study in Alzheimer’s disease patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gilden DM, Kubisiak JM, Wrobleski KK, Ball DE, Bowman L. Using U.S. Medicare records to evaluate the indirect health effects on spouses: a case study in Alzheimer’s disease patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Suehs BT, Shah SN, Davis CD, Alvir J, Faison WE, Patel NC, et al. Household members of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: health conditions, healthcare resource use, and healthcare costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:435–41.CrossRefPubMed Suehs BT, Shah SN, Davis CD, Alvir J, Faison WE, Patel NC, et al. Household members of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: health conditions, healthcare resource use, and healthcare costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:435–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Geldmacher DS, Kirson NY, Birnbaum HG, Eapen S, Kantor E, Cummings AK, et al. Implications of early treatment among Medicaid patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:214–24.CrossRefPubMed Geldmacher DS, Kirson NY, Birnbaum HG, Eapen S, Kantor E, Cummings AK, et al. Implications of early treatment among Medicaid patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:214–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Armstrong RA, Lantos PL, Cairns NJ. Overlap between neurodegenerative disorders. Neuropathology. 2005;25:111–24.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong RA, Lantos PL, Cairns NJ. Overlap between neurodegenerative disorders. Neuropathology. 2005;25:111–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Borson S, Scanlan JM, Watanabe J, Tu SP, Lessig M. Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:349–55.CrossRefPubMed Borson S, Scanlan JM, Watanabe J, Tu SP, Lessig M. Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:349–55.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mitchell AJ, Meader N, Pentzek M. Clinical recognition of dementia and cognitive impairment in primary care: a meta-analysis of physician accuracy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124:165–83.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell AJ, Meader N, Pentzek M. Clinical recognition of dementia and cognitive impairment in primary care: a meta-analysis of physician accuracy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124:165–83.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dall TM, Storm MV, Chakrabarti R, Drogan O, Keran CM, Donofrio PD, et al. Supply and demand analysis of the current and future US neurology workforce. Neurology. 2013;81:470–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dall TM, Storm MV, Chakrabarti R, Drogan O, Keran CM, Donofrio PD, et al. Supply and demand analysis of the current and future US neurology workforce. Neurology. 2013;81:470–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRef Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075–9.CrossRefPubMed Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Barnes DE, Beiser AS, Lee A, Langa KM, Koyama A, Preis SR, et al. Development and validation of a brief dementia screening indicator for primary care. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:656–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barnes DE, Beiser AS, Lee A, Langa KM, Koyama A, Preis SR, et al. Development and validation of a brief dementia screening indicator for primary care. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:656–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Discussion paper on the clinical investigation of medicines for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, European Medicines Agency, 2014, 23 October 2014, EMA/CHMP/539931/2014. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Discussion paper on the clinical investigation of medicines for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, European Medicines Agency, 2014, 23 October 2014, EMA/CHMP/539931/2014.
Metadata
Title
Assessing the economic burden of Alzheimer’s disease patients first diagnosed by specialists
Authors
Noam Y. Kirson
Urvi Desai
Ljubica Ristovska
Alice Kate G. Cummings
Howard G. Birnbaum
Wenyu Ye
J. Scott Andrews
Daniel Ball
Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0303-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Geriatrics 1/2016 Go to the issue