Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada

Authors: Alexandra C. McKenna, Marita Kloseck, Richard Crilly, Jan Polgar

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As the demographic of older people continues to grow, health services that support independence among community-dwelling seniors have become increasingly important. Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS) are medical alert systems, designed to serve as a safety net for seniors living alone. Health care professionals often recommend that seniors in danger of falls or other medical emergencies obtain a PERS. The purpose of the study was to investigate the experience of seniors living with and using a PERS in their daily lives, using a qualitative grounded theory approach.

Methods

Five focus groups and 10 semi-structured interviews, with a total of 30 participants, were completed using a grounded theory approach. All participants were PERS subscribers over the age of 80, living alone in a naturally occurring retirement community (NORC) with high health service utilization in a major urban centre in Ontario. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop themes and ultimately a model of why and how seniors obtain and use the PERS.

Results

Two core themes, unpredictability and decision-making around PERS activation, emerged as major features of the theoretical model. Being able to get help and the psychological value of PERS informed the context of living with a PERS.

Conclusions

A number of theoretical conclusions related to unpredictability and the decision-making process around activating PERS were generated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dibner AS. Linking frail elderly to the help network. Nurs Homes. 1982;31(6):12–5.PubMed Dibner AS. Linking frail elderly to the help network. Nurs Homes. 1982;31(6):12–5.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Redd JL, Zura RD, Tanner AE, Wal EE, Wu MM, Edlic RF. Personal emergency response systems. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1992;13:453–9.CrossRefPubMed Redd JL, Zura RD, Tanner AE, Wal EE, Wu MM, Edlic RF. Personal emergency response systems. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1992;13:453–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dibner AS. Personal emergency response systems: communication technology aids elderly and their families. J Appl Gerontol. 1990;9(4):504–10. Dibner AS. Personal emergency response systems: communication technology aids elderly and their families. J Appl Gerontol. 1990;9(4):504–10.
4.
go back to reference Levine DA, Tideiksaar R. Personal emergency response systems: factors associated with use among older persons. Mount Sinai J Med. 1995;62(4):293–7. Levine DA, Tideiksaar R. Personal emergency response systems: factors associated with use among older persons. Mount Sinai J Med. 1995;62(4):293–7.
5.
go back to reference Fallis WM, Silverthorne D, Franklin J, McClement S. Client and responder perceptions of a personal emergency response system: Lifeline. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2007;26(3):1–19.CrossRefPubMed Fallis WM, Silverthorne D, Franklin J, McClement S. Client and responder perceptions of a personal emergency response system: Lifeline. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2007;26(3):1–19.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mann WC, Belchior P, Tomita MR, Kemp B. Use of personal emergency response systems by older individuals with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2005;17(1):1–18.CrossRef Mann WC, Belchior P, Tomita MR, Kemp B. Use of personal emergency response systems by older individuals with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2005;17(1):1–18.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roush RE, Teasdale TA, Murphy JN, Kirk MS. Impact of a personal emergency response system on hospital utilization by community-residing elders. Southern Med J. 1995;88(9):917–22.CrossRefPubMed Roush RE, Teasdale TA, Murphy JN, Kirk MS. Impact of a personal emergency response system on hospital utilization by community-residing elders. Southern Med J. 1995;88(9):917–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Roush RE, Teapapsdale TA. Reduced hospitalization rates of two sets of community-residing older adults after use of a personal response system. J Appl Gerontol. 1997;16(3):355–67.CrossRef Roush RE, Teapapsdale TA. Reduced hospitalization rates of two sets of community-residing older adults after use of a personal response system. J Appl Gerontol. 1997;16(3):355–67.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee JS, Hurley MJ, Carew D, Fisher R, Kiss A, Drummond N. A randomized control trial to assess the impact on an emergency response system on anxiety and health care use among older emergency patients after a fall. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(4):301–8.CrossRefPubMed Lee JS, Hurley MJ, Carew D, Fisher R, Kiss A, Drummond N. A randomized control trial to assess the impact on an emergency response system on anxiety and health care use among older emergency patients after a fall. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(4):301–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Porter EJ. Considering the use of a personal emergency response system: An experience of frail, older women. Care Management Journals. 2002;3(4):192–8.CrossRefPubMed Porter EJ. Considering the use of a personal emergency response system: An experience of frail, older women. Care Management Journals. 2002;3(4):192–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Porter EJ. Moments of apprehension in the midst of a certainty: some frail older widows’ lives with a personal emergency response system. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(9):1311–23.CrossRefPubMed Porter EJ. Moments of apprehension in the midst of a certainty: some frail older widows’ lives with a personal emergency response system. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(9):1311–23.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Porter EJ. Wearing and using personal emergency response system buttons: older frail widows’ intentions. J Gerontol Nurs. 2005;31(10):26–33.CrossRefPubMed Porter EJ. Wearing and using personal emergency response system buttons: older frail widows’ intentions. J Gerontol Nurs. 2005;31(10):26–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications; 2008.
14.
go back to reference Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):250–60.CrossRef Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):250–60.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publications; 1985. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publications; 1985.
16.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In: Williams DD, editor. Naturalistic Evaluation. California: Jossey-Bass; 1986. p. 15–25. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In: Williams DD, editor. Naturalistic Evaluation. California: Jossey-Bass; 1986. p. 15–25.
17.
go back to reference Bostrom M, Bjorklund A, Kjellstrom S, Malmberg B. Personal emergency response system (PERS) alarms may induce insecurity feelings. Gerontechnology. 2011;10(3):s140–145.CrossRef Bostrom M, Bjorklund A, Kjellstrom S, Malmberg B. Personal emergency response system (PERS) alarms may induce insecurity feelings. Gerontechnology. 2011;10(3):s140–145.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bostrom M, Kjellstrom S, Bjorklund A. Older persons have ambivalent feelings about the use of monitoring technologies. Tech Disabil. 2013;25:117–25. Bostrom M, Kjellstrom S, Bjorklund A. Older persons have ambivalent feelings about the use of monitoring technologies. Tech Disabil. 2013;25:117–25.
19.
go back to reference Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Pimley S, Novacek J. Age differences in stress and coping processes. Psychol Aging. 1987;2(2):171–84.CrossRefPubMed Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Pimley S, Novacek J. Age differences in stress and coping processes. Psychol Aging. 1987;2(2):171–84.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.CrossRefPubMed Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(9):439–48.CrossRefPubMed Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(9):439–48.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wessels R, Dijcks B, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices: a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15:231–8. Wessels R, Dijcks B, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices: a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15:231–8.
Metadata
Title
Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada
Authors
Alexandra C. McKenna
Marita Kloseck
Richard Crilly
Jan Polgar
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0079-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Geriatrics 1/2015 Go to the issue