Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Social cohesion and belonging predict the well-being of community-dwelling older people

Authors: Jane M Cramm, Anna P Nieboer

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The neighborhood social environment has been identified as an important aspect of older people’s well-being. Poor neighborhood conditions can pose difficulties in obtaining support, especially for older people who live alone. Although social environments have been found to be related to well-being among older people, the longitudinal relationship between the social environment and well-being remains poorly undestood. Research on the effects of changes in neighborhood characteristics, such as social cohesion and social belonging, on well-being is lacking. Therefore, the study aims are (i) describe social cohesion, social belonging, and instrumental goals to achieve well-being among community-dwelling older people, (ii) determine whether these factors varied according to neighborhood social deprivation and compare these findings to those from chronically ill/previously hospitalized older people, and (iii) identify longitudinal relationships between social cohesion and belonging and well-being.

Methods

Independently living Dutch older adults (aged ≥ 70 years) were asked to complete questionnaires in 2011 (T0) and 2013 (T1). Response rates at T0 and T1 were 66% (945/1440) and 62% (588/945), respectively. Descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, analysis of variance, univariate analyses and multilevel regression analyses controlling for background characteristics and baseline well-being were performed.

Results

Of 945 respondents [43% male; mean age, 77.5 ± 5.8 (range, 70–101) years], 34.7% were married and 83.3% were Dutch natives. Social cohesion remained constant over time, whereas social belonging improved (p ≤ 0.05). Older people living in socially deprived neighborhoods report poorer overall well-being and instrumental goals to achieve well-being. Baseline social cohesion, changes therein (both p ≤ .001), baseline social belonging, and changes therein (both p ≤ .05) predicted well-being at T1.

Conclusion

This study showed that social cohesion, belonging, and changes therein predict the social as well as physical well-being of community-dwelling older people in the Netherlands over time. The creation of stronger ties among neighbors and a sense of belonging is needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population ageing: 1950–2050. New York: United Nations Publications; 2001. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population ageing: 1950–2050. New York: United Nations Publications; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Nieboer AP. Sustainable care in a time of crisis. Inaugural lecture, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, November 1, 2013. Nieboer AP. Sustainable care in a time of crisis. Inaugural lecture, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, November 1, 2013.
4.
go back to reference Watson D. The vicissitudes of mood measurement: effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1988;55:128–41.CrossRef Watson D. The vicissitudes of mood measurement: effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1988;55:128–41.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lindenberg S. Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In: Ganzeboom H, Lindenberg S, editors. Verklarende Sociologie; Opstellen Voor Reinhart Wippler. Amsterdam: Thesis Publications; 1996. Lindenberg S. Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In: Ganzeboom H, Lindenberg S, editors. Verklarende Sociologie; Opstellen Voor Reinhart Wippler. Amsterdam: Thesis Publications; 1996.
6.
go back to reference Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Verbrugge LM. Subjective well-being and social production functions. Soc Ind Res. 1999;46:61–90.CrossRef Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Verbrugge LM. Subjective well-being and social production functions. Soc Ind Res. 1999;46:61–90.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nieboer A, Lindenberg S, Boomsma A, van Bruggen AC. Dimensions of well-being and their measurement: the SPF-IL scale. Soc Indic Res. 2005;73:313–53.CrossRef Nieboer A, Lindenberg S, Boomsma A, van Bruggen AC. Dimensions of well-being and their measurement: the SPF-IL scale. Soc Indic Res. 2005;73:313–53.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nieboer AP. Life-events and well-being: a prospective study on changes in well-being of elderly people due to a serious illness event or death of the spouse. Amsterdam, NL: Thesis Publishers; 1997. Nieboer AP. Life-events and well-being: a prospective study on changes in well-being of elderly people due to a serious illness event or death of the spouse. Amsterdam, NL: Thesis Publishers; 1997.
9.
go back to reference Cramm JM, van Dijk HM, Nieboer AP. The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. Gerontologist. 2013;53 Suppl 1:142–52.CrossRefPubMed Cramm JM, van Dijk HM, Nieboer AP. The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. Gerontologist. 2013;53 Suppl 1:142–52.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Oswald F, Jopp D, Rott C, Wahl HW. Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction? Gerontologist. 2011;51 Suppl 2:238–50.CrossRefPubMed Oswald F, Jopp D, Rott C, Wahl HW. Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction? Gerontologist. 2011;51 Suppl 2:238–50.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, Reeve J, Allen RES. The meaning of “ageing in place” to older people. Gerontologist. 2011. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098 Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, Reeve J, Allen RES. The meaning of “ageing in place” to older people. Gerontologist. 2011. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098
12.
go back to reference Lindstrom M, Merlo J, Ostergren P. Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: a multilevel analysis of the city of Malmo, Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1779–91.CrossRefPubMed Lindstrom M, Merlo J, Ostergren P. Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: a multilevel analysis of the city of Malmo, Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1779–91.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schwirian KP, Schwirian PM. Neighboring, residential satisfaction, and psychological well-being in urban elders. J Commun Psychol. 1993;21:285–99.CrossRef Schwirian KP, Schwirian PM. Neighboring, residential satisfaction, and psychological well-being in urban elders. J Commun Psychol. 1993;21:285–99.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yasuda N, Zimmerman SI, Hawkes W, Fredman L, Hebel JR, Magaziner J. Relation of social network characteristics to 5-year mortality among young-old versus old-old white women in an urban community. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:516–23.CrossRefPubMed Yasuda N, Zimmerman SI, Hawkes W, Fredman L, Hebel JR, Magaziner J. Relation of social network characteristics to 5-year mortality among young-old versus old-old white women in an urban community. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:516–23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Thompson EE, Krause N. Living alone and neighborhood characteristics as predictors of social support in late life. J Gerontol: Soc Sci. 1998;53B:354–S364.CrossRef Thompson EE, Krause N. Living alone and neighborhood characteristics as predictors of social support in late life. J Gerontol: Soc Sci. 1998;53B:354–S364.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kellaher L, Peace S, Holland C. Environment, identity and old age–quality of life or a life of quality? In: Walker A, Hennessy CH, editors. Growing older: quality of life in older age. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2004. p. 60–80. Kellaher L, Peace S, Holland C. Environment, identity and old age–quality of life or a life of quality? In: Walker A, Hennessy CH, editors. Growing older: quality of life in older age. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2004. p. 60–80.
17.
go back to reference Philips DR, Siu OL, Yeh AG O, Cheng KHC. Ageing and the urban environment. In: Andrews GJ, Philips DR, editors. Ageing and place. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005. p. 147–63. Philips DR, Siu OL, Yeh AG O, Cheng KHC. Ageing and the urban environment. In: Andrews GJ, Philips DR, editors. Ageing and place. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005. p. 147–63.
18.
go back to reference Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Relationships between frailty, neighborhood security, social cohesion and sense of belonging among community-dwelling older people. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13 Suppl 3:759–63.CrossRefPubMed Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Relationships between frailty, neighborhood security, social cohesion and sense of belonging among community-dwelling older people. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13 Suppl 3:759–63.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Russell C, Hill B, Basser M. Older people’s lives in the inner city: hazardous or rewarding? Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998;22:98–106.CrossRefPubMed Russell C, Hill B, Basser M. Older people’s lives in the inner city: hazardous or rewarding? Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998;22:98–106.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Harpham T, Grant E, Thomas E. Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. Health Policy Plan. 2002;17:106–11.CrossRefPubMed Harpham T, Grant E, Thomas E. Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. Health Policy Plan. 2002;17:106–11.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Kawachi I, Berkman L, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 174–7. Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Kawachi I, Berkman L, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 174–7.
22.
go back to reference Lochner K, Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health Place. 1999;5:259–70.CrossRefPubMed Lochner K, Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health Place. 1999;5:259–70.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Subramanian SV, Lochner KA, Kawachi I. Neighborhood differences in social capital: a compositional artifact or a contextual construct? Health Place. 2003;9:33–44.CrossRefPubMed Subramanian SV, Lochner KA, Kawachi I. Neighborhood differences in social capital: a compositional artifact or a contextual construct? Health Place. 2003;9:33–44.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference La Gory M, Ward R, Sherman S. The ecology of aging: neighborhood satisfaction in an older population. Sociol Q. 1985;26:405–18.CrossRef La Gory M, Ward R, Sherman S. The ecology of aging: neighborhood satisfaction in an older population. Sociol Q. 1985;26:405–18.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sampson RJ. Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: a multilevel systemic model. Am Sociol Rev. 1988;53:766–79.CrossRef Sampson RJ. Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: a multilevel systemic model. Am Sociol Rev. 1988;53:766–79.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Forrest R, Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Stud. 2001;38:2125–43.CrossRef Forrest R, Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Stud. 2001;38:2125–43.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Völker B, Flap H, Lindenberg S. When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods. Eur Sociol Rev. 2007;23(1):99–114.CrossRef Völker B, Flap H, Lindenberg S. When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods. Eur Sociol Rev. 2007;23(1):99–114.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Steverink N. When and why frail elderly people give up independent living: the Netherlands as an example. Ageing Soc. 2001;21:45–69.CrossRef Steverink N. When and why frail elderly people give up independent living: the Netherlands as an example. Ageing Soc. 2001;21:45–69.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Neighborhood attributes security and solidarity promote the well-being of community-dwelling older people in the Netherlands. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013. doi:10.1111/ggi.12133 Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Neighborhood attributes security and solidarity promote the well-being of community-dwelling older people in the Netherlands. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013. doi:10.1111/ggi.12133
30.
go back to reference Cramm JM, van Dijk H, Lotters F, van Exel J, Nieboer AP. Evaluation of an integrated neighbourhood approach to improve well-being of frail elderly in a Dutch community: a study protocol. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cramm JM, van Dijk H, Lotters F, van Exel J, Nieboer AP. Evaluation of an integrated neighbourhood approach to improve well-being of frail elderly in a Dutch community: a study protocol. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Cramm JM, Hartgerink JM, de Vreede PL, Bakker TJ, Steyerberg EW, Mackenbach JP, et al. The relationship between older adults' self-management abilities, well-being and depression. Eur J Ageing. 2012;4:353–60.CrossRef Cramm JM, Hartgerink JM, de Vreede PL, Bakker TJ, Steyerberg EW, Mackenbach JP, et al. The relationship between older adults' self-management abilities, well-being and depression. Eur J Ageing. 2012;4:353–60.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fone D, Dunstan F, Lloyd K, Williams G, Watkins J, Palmer S. Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? A multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:338–45.CrossRefPubMed Fone D, Dunstan F, Lloyd K, Williams G, Watkins J, Palmer S. Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? A multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:338–45.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ellaway A, MacIntyre S, Kearns A. Perceptions of place and health in socially contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Stud. 2001;38:2299–316.CrossRef Ellaway A, MacIntyre S, Kearns A. Perceptions of place and health in socially contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Stud. 2001;38:2299–316.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:125–39.CrossRefPubMed Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:125–39.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 1–34.CrossRef Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, editors. Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 1–34.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Frieling MA, Lindenberg SM, Stokman FN. Collaborative communities through coproduction: Two case studies. Am Rev Public Admin. advance online publication. 2012; doi:10.1177/0275074012456897 Frieling MA, Lindenberg SM, Stokman FN. Collaborative communities through coproduction: Two case studies. Am Rev Public Admin. advance online publication. 2012; doi:10.1177/0275074012456897
39.
go back to reference van Dijk H, Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. The experiences of neighbour, volunteer and professional support-givers in supporting community dwelling older people. Health Soc Care Commun. 2013;21 Suppl 2:150–8.CrossRef van Dijk H, Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. The experiences of neighbour, volunteer and professional support-givers in supporting community dwelling older people. Health Soc Care Commun. 2013;21 Suppl 2:150–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference van Dijk H, Cramm JM, van Exel J, Nieboer AP. The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Ageing Soc. 2014; doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14000622 van Dijk H, Cramm JM, van Exel J, Nieboer AP. The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Ageing Soc. 2014; doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14000622
41.
go back to reference Van der Meer M. Productivity among older people in the Netherlands: variations by gender and the sociospatial context in 2002–03. Ageing Soc. 2006;26 Suppl 6:901–23.CrossRef Van der Meer M. Productivity among older people in the Netherlands: variations by gender and the sociospatial context in 2002–03. Ageing Soc. 2006;26 Suppl 6:901–23.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Schmeets H, van der Bie R, editors. Enquêteonderzoek onder allochtonen. Problemen en oplossingen. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen. 2005. Schmeets H, van der Bie R, editors. Enquêteonderzoek onder allochtonen. Problemen en oplossingen. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen. 2005.
Metadata
Title
Social cohesion and belonging predict the well-being of community-dwelling older people
Authors
Jane M Cramm
Anna P Nieboer
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0027-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Geriatrics 1/2015 Go to the issue