Top

BMC Primary Care

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

The impact of training healthcare professionals’ communication skills on the clinical care of diabetes and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Mi Yao, Xue-ying Zhou, Zhi-jie Xu, Richard Lehman, Shamil Haroon, Dawn Jackson, Kar Keung Cheng

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Diabetes and hypertension care require effective communication between healthcare professionals and patients. Training programs may improve the communication skills of healthcare professionals but no systematic review has examined their effectiveness at improving clinical outcomes and patient experience in the context of diabetes and hypertension care.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to summarize the effectiveness of any type of communication skills training for healthcare professionals to improve diabetes and/or hypertension care compared to no training or usual care. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to August 2020 without language restrictions. Data on the country, type of healthcare setting, type of healthcare professionals, population, intervention, comparison, primary outcomes of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and blood pressure, and secondary outcomes of quality of life, patient experience and understanding, medication adherence and patient-doctor relationship were extracted for each included study. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed by Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

7011 abstracts were identified, and 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included a total of 21,762 patients and 785 health professionals. 13 trials investigated the effect of communication skills training in diabetes management and 6 trials in hypertension. 10 trials were at a low risk and 9 trials were at a high risk of bias. Training included motivational interviewing, patient centred care communication, cardiovascular disease risk communication, shared decision making, cultural competency training and psychological skill training. The trials found no significant effects on HbA1c (n = 4501, pooled mean difference -0.02 mmol/mol, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.05), systolic blood pressure (n = 2505, pooled mean difference -2.61 mmHg, 95% CI -9.19 to 3.97), or diastolic blood pressure (n = 2440, pooled mean difference -0.06 mmHg, 95% CI -3.65 to 2.45). There was uncertainty in whether training was effective at improving secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

The communication skills training interventions for healthcare professionals identified in this systematic review did not improve HbA1c, BP or other relevant outcomes in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Further research is needed to methodically co-produce and evaluate communication skills training for chronic disease management with healthcare professionals and patients.

Available only for authorised users

GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7

Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of. JAMA. 2017;317(2):165–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19043.CrossRefPubMed

Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513–1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8

Zhou B, Bentham J, Di Cesare M, et al. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31919-5.CrossRef

Berry JD, Dyer A, Cai X, et al. Lifetime Risks of Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(4):321–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1012848.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ferrannini E, Cushman WC. Diabetes and hypertension: the bad companions. Lancet. 2012;380(9841):601–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60987-8.CrossRefPubMed

Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, et al. Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care. 2015:dc150730. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0730

Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127 LP-e248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006

Lipska KJ, Yao X, Herrin J, et al. Trends in Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia, 2006–2013. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(4):468 LP - 475. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0985

10.

Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US Trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension, 1988–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(20):2043–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.650.CrossRefPubMed

11.

NICE. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management | Guidance and guidelines | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28/chapter/Patient-centred-care#.XGWXJg-2H5Q.mendeley. Accessed February 14, 2020.

12.

NICE. Overview | Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management | Guidance | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127#.XIkqeORo2R0.mendeley. Accessed February 13, 2020.

13.

Naik AD, Kallen MA, Walder A, Street RL Jr. Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication. Circulation. 2008;117(11):1361–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Zolnierek KBH, DiMatteo MR. Physician Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment: A Meta-Analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–834. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40221984.

15.

Lim LL, Lau ESH, Kong APS, et al. Aspects of Multicomponent Integrated Care Promote Sustained Improvement in Surrogate Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(6):1312–20. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Lloyd M. Clinical Communication Skills for Medicine. Fourth edi. (Bor R, Noble LM, eds.). Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2018.; 2018.

17.

Rollnick S, Miller WR. What is Motivational Interviewing? Behav Cogn Psychother. 1995;23(4):325–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135246580001643X.CrossRef

18.

Jones A, Gladstone BP, Lübeck M, Lindekilde N, Upton D, Vach W. Motivational interventions in the management of HbA1c levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014;8(2):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Song D, Xu TZ, Sun QH. Effect of motivational interviewing on self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. 2014;1(3):291–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.06.002.CrossRef

20.

Ma C, Zhou Y, Zhou W, et al. Evaluation of the effect of motivational interviewing counselling on hypertension care. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(2):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.011.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Stiggelbout AM, Van Der Weijden T, De Wit MPT, et al. Shared decision making: Really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;344(7842):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e256.CrossRef

22.

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Montori VM, Gafni A, Charles C. A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: The case of diabetes. Heal Expect. 2006;9(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00359.x.CrossRef

24.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349(January):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.CrossRef

25.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(7829):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.CrossRef

26.

Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: Impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. Br Med J. 1998;317(7167):1202–1208. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed6&NEWS=N&AN=28488511.

27.

Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, et al. Training Dietitians in Basic Motivational Interviewing Skills Results in Changes in Their Counseling Style and in Lower Saturated Fat Intakes in Their Patients. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(1):8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.010.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, et al. General practitioners trained in motivational interviewing can positively affect the attitude to behaviour change in people with type 2 diabetes. One year follow-up of an RCT, ADDITION Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(3 CC-SR-BEHAVMED CC-Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders):172‐179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430903072876

29.

Thomas D, Garrett M, Marshall R, et al. Cultural competency training and performance reports to improve diabetes care for black patients: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(1):40–6. https://doi.org/10.1059/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00009.CrossRef

30.

Heinrich E, Candel MJ, Schapte NC, et al. Effect evaluation of a Motivational Interviewing based counselling strategy in diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;90(3):270–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2010.09.012.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, et al. Effect of “motivational interviewing” on quality of care measures in screen detected type 2 diabetes patients: a one-year follow-up of an RCT, ADDITION Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29(2):92–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2011.554271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Robling M, McNamara R, Bennert K, et al. The effect of the Talking Diabetes consulting skills intervention on glycaemic control and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes: Cluster randomised controlled trial (DEPICTED study). BMJ. 2012;344(7860): e2359. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Andrew F, Wendy H, Dyfig H, et al. An explanatory randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led, consultation-based intervention to support patients with adherence to taking glucose lowering medication for type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:30. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed13&NEWS=N&AN=366366783.

34.

Welschen LMC, Bot SDM, Kostense PJ, et al. Effects of cardiovascular disease risk communication for patients with type 2 diabetes on risk perception in a randomized controlled trial: The @RISK study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2485–92. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Jansink R, Braspenning J, Keizer E, et al. No identifiable Hb1Ac or lifestyle change after a comprehensive diabetes programme including motivational interviewing: A cluster randomised trial. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013;31(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.797178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Tinsel I, Buchholz A, Vach W, et al. Shared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14 CC-:135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-135

37.

Lise J, Helle T, Vebeke Z, et al. Effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in motivation support in type 2 diabetes care: A cluster-randomised trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(5): e96683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096683.CrossRef

38.

39.

Meredith GM, Michelle BO, Mark G, et al. Brief provider communication skills training fails to impact patient hypertension outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(2):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.014.CrossRef

40.

Kressin NR, Long JA, Glickman ME, et al. A brief, multifaceted, generic intervention to improve blood pressure control and reduce disparities had little effect. Ethn Dis. 2016;26(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.26.1.27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Okada H, Onda M, Shoji M, et al. Effects of lifestyle advice provided by pharmacists on blood pressure: The COMmunity Pharmacists ASSist for Blood Pressure (COMPASS-BP) randomized trial. Biosci Trends. 2017;11(6):632–9. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2017.01256.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Akturan S, Kaya ÇA, Ünalan PC, et al. The effect of the BATHE interview technique on the empowerment of diabetic patients in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(2):154–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2016.12.003.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Sany B, Peyman N, Behezhed F, et al. Health providers’ communication skills training affects hypertension outcomes. Med Teach. 2018;40(2):154–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1395002.CrossRef

44.

Ismail K, Winkley K, de Zoysa N, et al. Nurse-led psychological intervention for type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial (Diabetes-6 study) in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(673):e531–40. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X696185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Moore PM, Rivera MS, Grez AM, et al. Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD003751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub3

46.

Oliveira VC, Ferreira ML, Pinto RZ, et al. Effectiveness of Training Clinicians’ Communication Skills on Patients’ Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(8):601–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.08.002.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Papageorgiou A, Loke YK, Fromage M. Communication skills training for mental health professionals working with people with severe mental illness. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD010006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010006.pub2

48.

Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet (London, England). 2004;363(9405):312–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15392-5.CrossRef

Title: The impact of training healthcare professionals’ communication skills on the clinical care of diabetes and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Mi Yao
Xue-ying Zhou
Zhi-jie Xu
Richard Lehman
Shamil Haroon
Dawn Jackson
Kar Keung Cheng
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Care
Hypertension
Hypertension
Published in: BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01504-x

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

The impact of training healthcare professionals’ communication skills on the clinical care of diabetes and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

A mixed methods study on medicines information needs and challenges in New Zealand general practice

Evaluation of an electronic consultation service for transgender care

Frequency of providing a palliative approach to care in family practice: a chart review and perceptions of healthcare practitioners in Canada

Barriers and attitudes towards cervical cancer screening in primary healthcare in Poland - doctors’ perspective

Contemporary treatment of anxiety in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in countries with universal healthcare

Patient perspectives on tablet-based technology to collect risk factor information in primary care