Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Rectal Cancer | Research

Symptoms and signs of colorectal cancer, with differences between proximal and distal colon cancer: a prospective cohort study of diagnostic accuracy in primary care

Authors: Knut Holtedahl, Lars Borgquist, Gé A. Donker, Frank Buntinx, David Weller, Christine Campbell, Jörgen Månsson, Victoria Hammersley, Tonje Braaten, Ranjan Parajuli

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In an abdominal symptom study in primary care in six European countries, 511 cases of cancer were recorded prospectively among 61,802 patients 16 years and older in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium and Scotland. Colorectal cancer is one of the main types of cancer associated with abdominal symptoms; hence, an in-depth subgroup analysis of the 94 colorectal cancers was carried out in order to study variation in symptom presentation among cancers in different anatomical locations.

Method

Initial data capture was by completion of standardised forms containing closed questions about symptoms recorded during the consultation. Follow-up data were provided by the GP after diagnosis, based on medical record data made after the consultation. GPs also provided free text comments about the diagnostic procedure for individual patients. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyse differences between groups.

Results

Almost all symptoms recorded could indicate colorectal cancer. ‘Rectal bleeding’ had a specificity of 99.4% and a PPV of 4.0%. Faecal occult blood in stool (FOBT) or anaemia may indicate gastrointestinal bleeding: when these symptoms and signs were combined, sensitivity reached 57.5%, with 69.2% for cancer in the distal colon. For proximal colon cancers, none of 18 patients had ‘Rectal bleeding’ at the initial consultation, but three of the 18 did so at a later consultation. ‘Abdominal pain, lower part’, ‘Constipation’ and ‘Distended abdomen, bloating’ were less specific and also less sensitive than ‘Rectal bleeding’, and with PPV between 0.7% and 1.9%.

Conclusions

Apart from rectal bleeding, single symptoms did not reach the PPV 3% NICE threshold. However, supplementary information such as a positive FOBT or persistent symptoms may revise the PPV upwards. If a colorectal cancer is suspected by the GP despite few symptoms, the total clinical picture may still reach the NICE PPV threshold of 3% and justify a specific referral.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3322/​caac.​21492.
9.
go back to reference Macadam DB. A study in general practice of the symptoms and delay patterns in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979;29(209):723–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Macadam DB. A study in general practice of the symptoms and delay patterns in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979;29(209):723–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM RJ, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, LijmerJG Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, For the STARD Group. STARD 2015. STARD checklist. An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. 2015. Bossuyt PM RJ, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, LijmerJG Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, For the STARD Group. STARD 2015. STARD checklist. An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. 2015.
11.
go back to reference Rubin G, Hamilton W. Alarm features of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2009;58(7):1026–7 (author reply).PubMed Rubin G, Hamilton W. Alarm features of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2009;58(7):1026–7 (author reply).PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hirai HW, Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Wong SH, Ching JY, Wong MC, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43(7):755–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13556. Hirai HW, Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Wong SH, Ching JY, Wong MC, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43(7):755–64. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​apt.​13556.
21.
go back to reference Feinstein AR, Pritchett JA, Schimpff CR. The epidemiology of cancer therapy. IV. The extraction of data from medical records. Ann Intern Med. 1969;123:571–90.CrossRef Feinstein AR, Pritchett JA, Schimpff CR. The epidemiology of cancer therapy. IV. The extraction of data from medical records. Ann Intern Med. 1969;123:571–90.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chapter four. The use of diagnostic information to revise probabilities. In: Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, editors. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company; 1980. Chapter four. The use of diagnostic information to revise probabilities. In: Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, editors. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company; 1980.
26.
30.
go back to reference Smith CF, Drew S, Ziebland S, Nicholson BD. Understanding the role of GPs' gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(698):e612-e21. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712301. Smith CF, Drew S, Ziebland S, Nicholson BD. Understanding the role of GPs' gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(698):e612-e21.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​3399/​bjgp20X712301.
36.
39.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study G. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345(8):555–60. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010328. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study G. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345(8):555–60. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa010328.
Metadata
Title
Symptoms and signs of colorectal cancer, with differences between proximal and distal colon cancer: a prospective cohort study of diagnostic accuracy in primary care
Authors
Knut Holtedahl
Lars Borgquist
Gé A. Donker
Frank Buntinx
David Weller
Christine Campbell
Jörgen Månsson
Victoria Hammersley
Tonje Braaten
Ranjan Parajuli
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01452-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Primary Care 1/2021 Go to the issue