Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

A qualitative evaluation to explore the suitability, feasibility and acceptability of using a ‘celebration card’ intervention in primary care to improve the uptake of childhood vaccinations

Authors: Saumu Lwembe, Stuart A. Green, Nuttan Tanna, Jane Connor, Colin Valler, Ruth Barnes

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Childhood vaccination remains a primary mechanism for reducing the burden of infectious disease. In the United Kingdom, as in many countries, a sustained effort is required to ensure that vaccination targets are met to afford protection to the whole population from vaccine preventable disease. The Celebrate and Protect programme is a collaborative partnership developed to improve the uptake of childhood vaccination across a number of boroughs within London through the use of a celebration card to encourage attendance for vaccination and enhance relationships between general practices and the parents/carers of children.

Methods

This study was undertaken to assess the suitability, feasibility and acceptability of the Celebrate and Protect programme across nine boroughs in London. Data were collected either from telephone interviews (n = 24) or from focus groups (n = 31). A total of 55 key informants were included in the study, representing strategic, commissioning or policy leads, healthcare professionals and primary care teams delivering vaccinations and parents/carers of children under five.

Results

The analysis of data identified that whilst parents/carers saw the celebration card positively this raised the issue of ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and the lack of information that parents/carers have to make informed decisions about vaccination. Similarly, healthcare professionals viewed the programme positively and felt that it was deliverable within existing resources although they raised wider questions about on-going sustainability and about quantitative data collection. In relation to the collaboration between primary care and a pharmaceutical company in developing the Celebrate and Protect programme, it was generally felt that, provided appropriate governance is in place, it was a pragmatic approach in which the benefits outweighed any perceived disadvantages.

Discussion

The Celebrate and Protect programme was seen as an innovative collaborative programme to engage with parents and carers of children in order to improve relationships between service users and providers and subsequently increase vaccination uptake. The analysis demonstrates that that the celebration card is suitable for its purpose, acceptable to both healthcare professionals and to parents/carers of children and the Celebrate and Protect programme has been able to deliver its aims.

Conclusion

Whilst the delivery of the ‘celebration card’ intervention in primary met its objectives there are some outstanding issues in terms of the sustainability of the initiative and the ability to demonstrate quantitative improvements in vaccination uptake rates.
Footnotes
1
As a result of the Health and Social Care Act 2012, Primary Care Trusts ceased to exist on 31 March 2013 and were replaced by Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). In London the PCTs were broadly coterminous with local authority boroughs and were the geographical unit for which immunisation rates were recorded.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andre FE, Booy R, Bock HL, Clemens J, Datta SK, John TJ, et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:140–6.CrossRefPubMed Andre FE, Booy R, Bock HL, Clemens J, Datta SK, John TJ, et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:140–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference British Medical Association. Childhood immunisation : a guide for healthcare professionals. London: British Medical Association; 2003. British Medical Association. Childhood immunisation : a guide for healthcare professionals. London: British Medical Association; 2003.
4.
go back to reference Public Health England. The UK immunisation schedule. In: Salisbury D, Ramsay M, editors. Immun. Against infect. Dis. London: Public Health England; 2013. p. 79–87. Public Health England. The UK immunisation schedule. In: Salisbury D, Ramsay M, editors. Immun. Against infect. Dis. London: Public Health England; 2013. p. 79–87.
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Health 21: The health for all policy framework for the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 1999. World Health Organization. Health 21: The health for all policy framework for the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 1999.
8.
go back to reference Health and Social Care Information Centre—Screening and Immunisations team. NHS Immunisation Statistics, England 2011–12. Leeds: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012. Health and Social Care Information Centre—Screening and Immunisations team. NHS Immunisation Statistics, England 2011–12. Leeds: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012.
10.
go back to reference Benin AL, Wisler-Scher DJ, Colson E, Shapiro ED, Holmboe ES. Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1532–41.CrossRefPubMed Benin AL, Wisler-Scher DJ, Colson E, Shapiro ED, Holmboe ES. Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1532–41.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Reducing differences in the uptake of immunisations: NICE public health guidance 21. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2009. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Reducing differences in the uptake of immunisations: NICE public health guidance 21. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2009.
13.
go back to reference The London Regional Immunisation Steering Group. Childhood Immunisation Programmes in London PCTs: Early sharing of good practice to improve immunisation coverage. London: Healthcare for London; 2009. The London Regional Immunisation Steering Group. Childhood Immunisation Programmes in London PCTs: Early sharing of good practice to improve immunisation coverage. London: Healthcare for London; 2009.
14.
go back to reference Jacobson VJC, Szilagyi P. Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005;CD003941. Jacobson VJC, Szilagyi P. Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005;CD003941.
15.
go back to reference Wagner KS, van Wijgerden JCJ, Andrews N, Goulden K, White JM. Childhood vaccination coverage by ethnicity within London between 2006/2007 and 2010/2011. Arch Dis Child. 2013;99:1–6. Wagner KS, van Wijgerden JCJ, Andrews N, Goulden K, White JM. Childhood vaccination coverage by ethnicity within London between 2006/2007 and 2010/2011. Arch Dis Child. 2013;99:1–6.
16.
go back to reference London Health Programmes. Report on BCG policy and provision in London. London: London Health Programmes; 2013. London Health Programmes. Report on BCG policy and provision in London. London: London Health Programmes; 2013.
17.
go back to reference Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R. Exploring corporate strategy. 7th ed. London: FT Prentice Hall; 2005. Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R. Exploring corporate strategy. 7th ed. London: FT Prentice Hall; 2005.
18.
go back to reference Medicines Pharmacy & Industry Group Department of Health. Best Practice Guidance on Joint Working Between the NHS And Pharmaceutical Industry and other Relevant Commercial Organisations. London: Department of Health; 2008. Medicines Pharmacy & Industry Group Department of Health. Best Practice Guidance on Joint Working Between the NHS And Pharmaceutical Industry and other Relevant Commercial Organisations. London: Department of Health; 2008.
Metadata
Title
A qualitative evaluation to explore the suitability, feasibility and acceptability of using a ‘celebration card’ intervention in primary care to improve the uptake of childhood vaccinations
Authors
Saumu Lwembe
Stuart A. Green
Nuttan Tanna
Jane Connor
Colin Valler
Ruth Barnes
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0497-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Primary Care 1/2016 Go to the issue