Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

The key therapeutic factors needed to deliver behavioural change interventions to decrease risky substance use (drug and alcohol) for looked after children and care leavers: a qualitative exploration with young people, carers and front line workers

Authors: Hayley Alderson, Rebecca Brown, Alex Copello, Eileen Kaner, Gillian Tober, Raghu Lingam, Ruth McGovern

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Looked after children and care leavers have an increased risk of drug and alcohol use compared to their non-LAC peers. Despite high prevalence rates within this population, looked after children are reported to show low levels of engagement in services resulting in unmet needs emerging from substance use. This paper reports on the initial formative phase of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial; SOLID (Supporting Looked After Children and Care Leavers In Decreasing Drugs, and Alcohol) that aimed to adapt two evidence-based psychosocial interventions, Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Social Behaviour and Network Therapy, which will aim to reduce substance misuse by looked after children.

Methods

We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 19 looked after children aged 12 to 20 years old, 16 carers and 14 professionals across four local authorities in the North East of England. The data gathered were analysed and then presented within co-production workshops inclusive of 13 young people and 14 professionals (drug and alcohol practitioners and social workers). Findings were used to adapt and refine the interventions prior to the trial.

Results

Overall findings suggested that whilst original components of both interventions were feasible to deliver and acceptable, specific process areas were highlighted including: increased emphasis upon therapeutic relationships, the benefits of using creative non-traditional methods of engagement and identification of treatment goals wider than those narrowly focused on substance misuse.

Conclusion

This paper provides an example of methods used to collect multiple perspectives to refine and co-develop interventions to reduce drug and alcohol use in the specific population of looked after children.

Trial registration

ISRCTN80786829 (first registered 06.06.2016- prospectively registered).
Literature
1.
Department for education, Statistics. Looked-after children and looked-after children and adoption. London: Department for Education; 2017.
2.
Meltzer H. The mental health of young people looked after by local authorities in England. London: H.M.S.O; 2003.CrossRef
3.
Ward J, Henderson Z, Pearson G. One problem among many: drug use among care leavers in transition to independent living. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate; 2003.
4.
Office for National Statistics, Drug misuse. Findings from the 2016/2017 crime survey for England and Wales. London: ONS; 2017.
5.
Blyth, L., Outcomes for Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England, as of 31 March 2012. 2012, Office of National Statistics.
6.
Ford T, et al. Psychiatric disorder among British children looked after by local authorities: comparison with children living in private households. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:319–25.CrossRef
7.
8.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence, Interventions to reduce substance misuse among vulnerable young people: Evidence Update April 2014. 2014.
9.
Department of Health England, Annual report of the Chief medical officer 2012. Our children deserve better: prevention pays. 2013, Department of Health: London.
10.
Lundahl BW, et al. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: twenty-five years of empirical studies. Res Soc Work Pract. 2010;20(2):137–60.CrossRef
11.
Tevyaw T, Monti P. Motivational enhancement and other brief interventions for adolescent substance abuse: foundations, applications and evaluations. Addiction. 2004;99(2):63–75.CrossRef
12.
Watson, J., et al., Youth Social Behaviour and Network Therapy (Y-SBNT) adaptation of a family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs- a randomised controlled feasibility trial. 2017. 21(15).
13.
Miller WR, A. Zweben, Carlo DSW, Di Clemente C, Rychtarik RG,, Motivational Enhancement Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals With Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. Project MATCH monograph series ed. M.E. Mattson. 1999: NIH publication.
14.
Dennis ML, Funk R, et al. Cross-validation of the alcohol and cannabis use measures in the global appraisal of individual needs (GAIN) and timeline Followback (TLFB; form 90) among adolescents in substance abuse treatment. Addiction. 2004;99(2):120–8.CrossRef
15.
Carney T, Myers B. Effectiveness of early interventions for substance-using adolescents: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012;7:25.CrossRef
16.
McCambridge J, Strang J. The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction. 2004;99:39–52.CrossRef
17.
Copello A. Social behaviour and network therapy for alcohol problems. London: Routledge; 2009.CrossRef
18.
Medical Research Council, Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. 2006, MRC: London.
19.
Alderson, H., et al., Supporting looked after children and care leavers in decreasing drugs, and alcohol (SOLID): protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of interventions to decrease risky substance use (drugs and alcohol) and improve mental health of looked after children and care leavers aged 12 -20 years: study protocol. Pilot and feasibility studies, 2017. 3(25).
20.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative resaerch in psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
21.
Donovan J, Sanders C. Key issues in the analysis of qualitative data in health services research. In: Bowling A, Ebrahim S, editors. Handbook of health research methods : investigation, measurement and analysis. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. p. 515–32.
22.
Morgan R. Children’s caremonitor: children on the state of social care in England. London: OFSTED; 2014.
23.
Duncalf Z. Listen up! Adult care leavers speak out. The views of 310 care leavers aged 17–78. Manchester: The care Leavers Association; 2010.
24.
Selwyn J. Children and young people's views of being in care: a literature review. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2015.
25.
Timms J, Thoburn J. Your shout!: A survey of the views of 706 children and young people in public care. London: NSPCC; 2003.
26.
Mcleod A. ‘A friend and an equal’: do young people in care seek the impossible from their social workers? Br J Soc Work. 2010;40:772–88.CrossRef
27.
Gaskell C. If the social worker had called at least it would show they cared. Young care leavers perspectives on the importance of care. Child Soc. 2010;24(2):136–47.CrossRef
28.
Hiles D, et al. Young people’s experience of social support during the process of leaving care: A review of the literature. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35:2059–71.CrossRef
29.
Holland S, et al. How was your day? Learning from experience: Informing preventative policies and practice by analysing critical moments in care leavers life histories. Cardiff: Cardiff University; 2010.
30.
Collins, S., Ethics of care and statutory social work in the UK: critical perspectives and strengths. Practice, 2017: p. 1–16.
31.
Jobe A, Garin S. ‘If kids don’t feel safe they don’t do anything’: young people’s views on seeking and receiving help from children's social services in England. Children and Family Social Work. 2012;18(4):429–38.CrossRef
32.
Barlow J. Using educational drama to improve outcomes for Looked after Children. Scot J Resid Child Care. 2011:11(1).
33.
Slayton S, D'Archer J, Kaplan F. Outcome studies on the efficacy of art therapy: a review of findings. Art Ther. 2010;27(3):108–18.CrossRef
34.
Henggeler S, et al. Eliminating (almost) treatment dropout of substance abusing or dependent delinquents through home-based multisystemic therapy. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:427–8.CrossRef
35.
Sexton T, Alexander J. Functional Family Therapy Clinical Training Manual. Baltimore: Casey Foundation; 2004.
36.
Blyth, L., Outcomes for Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England, as of 31 March 2013. 2013, Office of National Statistics.
37.
Selwyn J, Saunders H, Farmer E. The views of children and young people on being cared for by an independent foster-care provider. Br J Soc Work. 2010;40(3):696–713.CrossRef
38.
Boys A, et al. Psychiatric morbidity and substance use in young people aged 13-15 years: results from the child and adolescent survey of mental health. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;182:509–17.CrossRef
39.
Public Health England. Specialist substance misuse services for young people: a rapid mixed methods evidence review of current provision and main principles for commissioning. London: PHE; 2017.
40.
Kipping R, et al. Multiple risk behaviours in adolescence. J Public Health. 2012;34(suppl_1):i20–30.
Metadata
Title
The key therapeutic factors needed to deliver behavioural change interventions to decrease risky substance use (drug and alcohol) for looked after children and care leavers: a qualitative exploration with young people, carers and front line workers
Authors
Hayley Alderson
Rebecca Brown
Alex Copello
Eileen Kaner
Gillian Tober
Raghu Lingam
Ruth McGovern
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0674-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis

Research article

The association between influenza vaccination and socioeconomic status in high income countries varies by the measure used: a systematic review

Research article

Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study

Technical advance

A comparison of the polytomous Rasch analysis output of RUMM2030 and R (ltm/eRm/TAM/lordif)

Research article

Effective stakeholder engagement: design and implementation of a clinical trial (SWOG S1415CD) to improve cancer care

Research article

Illustration of different modelling assumptions for estimation of loss in expectation of life due to cancer