Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies

Authors: Niansheng Tang, Songjian Wang, Gen Ye

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The main purpose of dose-finding studies in Phase I trial is to estimate maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which is the maximum test dose that can be assigned with an acceptable level of toxicity. Existing methods developed for single-agent dose-finding assume that the dose-toxicity relationship follows a specific parametric potency curve. This assumption may lead to bias and unsafe dose escalations due to the misspecification of parametric curve.

Methods

This paper relaxes the parametric assumption of dose-toxicity relationship by imposing a Dirichlet process prior on unknown dose-toxicity curve. A hybrid algorithm combining the Gibbs sampler and adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling (ARMS) algorithm is developed to estimate the dose-toxicity curve, and a two-stage Bayesian nonparametric adaptive design is presented to estimate MTD.

Results

For comparison, we consider two classical continual reassessment methods (CRMs) (i.e., logistic and power models). Numerical results show the flexibility of the proposed method for single-agent dose-finding trials, and the proposed method behaves better than two classical CRMs under our considered scenarios.

Conclusions

The proposed dose-finding procedure is model-free and robust, and behaves satisfactorily even in small sample cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990; 46:33–48.CrossRef O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990; 46:33–48.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Whitehead J, Brunier H. Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments. Stat Med. 1995; 14:885–93.CrossRef Whitehead J, Brunier H. Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments. Stat Med. 1995; 14:885–93.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Piantadosi S, Fisher JD, Grossman S. Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998; 41:429–36.CrossRef Piantadosi S, Fisher JD, Grossman S. Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998; 41:429–36.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heyd JM, Carlin BP. Adaptive design improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Stat Med. 1999; 18:1307–21.CrossRef Heyd JM, Carlin BP. Adaptive design improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Stat Med. 1999; 18:1307–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leung DH, Wang YG. An extension of the continual reassessment method using decision theory. Stat Med. 2002; 21:51–63.CrossRef Leung DH, Wang YG. An extension of the continual reassessment method using decision theory. Stat Med. 2002; 21:51–63.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yuan Z, Chappell R, Bailey H. The Continual Reassessment Method for Multiple Toxicity Grades: A Bayesian Quasi ikelihood Approach. Biometrics. 2007; 63:173–9.CrossRef Yuan Z, Chappell R, Bailey H. The Continual Reassessment Method for Multiple Toxicity Grades: A Bayesian Quasi ikelihood Approach. Biometrics. 2007; 63:173–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yin G, Yuan Y. Bayesian Model Averaging Continual Reassessment Method in Phase I Clinical Trials. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009; 104:954–68.CrossRef Yin G, Yuan Y. Bayesian Model Averaging Continual Reassessment Method in Phase I Clinical Trials. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009; 104:954–68.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Møller S. An extension of the continual reassessment methods using a preliminary up-and-down design in a dose finding study in cancer patients, in order to investigate a greater range of doses. Stat Med. 2010; 14:911–22.CrossRef Møller S. An extension of the continual reassessment methods using a preliminary up-and-down design in a dose finding study in cancer patients, in order to investigate a greater range of doses. Stat Med. 2010; 14:911–22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fan SK, Lu Y, Wang YG. A simple Bayesian decision-theoretic design for dose-finding trials. Stat Med. 2012; 31:3719–30.CrossRef Fan SK, Lu Y, Wang YG. A simple Bayesian decision-theoretic design for dose-finding trials. Stat Med. 2012; 31:3719–30.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morita S, Thall PF, Takeda K. A simulation study of methods for selecting subgroup-specific dosesin phase i trials. Pharm Stat. 2017; 16:143–56.CrossRef Morita S, Thall PF, Takeda K. A simulation study of methods for selecting subgroup-specific dosesin phase i trials. Pharm Stat. 2017; 16:143–56.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gelfand AE, Kuo L. Nonparametric bayesian bioassay including ordered polytomous response. Biometrika. 1991; 78:657–66.CrossRef Gelfand AE, Kuo L. Nonparametric bayesian bioassay including ordered polytomous response. Biometrika. 1991; 78:657–66.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mukhopadhyay S. Bayesian nonparametric inference on the dose level with specified response rate. Biometrics. 2000; 56:220–6.CrossRef Mukhopadhyay S. Bayesian nonparametric inference on the dose level with specified response rate. Biometrics. 2000; 56:220–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gasparini M, Eisele J. A curve-free method for phase i clinical trials. Biometrics. 2000; 56:609–15.CrossRef Gasparini M, Eisele J. A curve-free method for phase i clinical trials. Biometrics. 2000; 56:609–15.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cheng YK. Dose Finding by the Continual Reassessment Method. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2011, pp. 57–62.CrossRef Cheng YK. Dose Finding by the Continual Reassessment Method. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2011, pp. 57–62.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ivanova A, Wang K. Bivariate isotonic design for dose-finding with ordered groups. Stat Med. 2006; 25:2018–26.CrossRef Ivanova A, Wang K. Bivariate isotonic design for dose-finding with ordered groups. Stat Med. 2006; 25:2018–26.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yan F, Mandrekar SJ, Yuan Y. Keyboard: a novel bayesian toxicity probability interval design for phase i clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2017; 23:3994–4003.CrossRef Yan F, Mandrekar SJ, Yuan Y. Keyboard: a novel bayesian toxicity probability interval design for phase i clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2017; 23:3994–4003.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee SM, Cheung YK. Modal calibration in the continual reassessment method. Clin Trials. 2009; 6:227–38.CrossRef Lee SM, Cheung YK. Modal calibration in the continual reassessment method. Clin Trials. 2009; 6:227–38.CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Escobar MD, West M. Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. Publ Am Stat Assoc. 1995; 90:577–88.CrossRef Escobar MD, West M. Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. Publ Am Stat Assoc. 1995; 90:577–88.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference West M. Hierarchial mixture models in neurological transmission analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997; 92:587–608.CrossRef West M. Hierarchial mixture models in neurological transmission analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997; 92:587–608.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies
Authors
Niansheng Tang
Songjian Wang
Gen Ye
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0604-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2018 Go to the issue