Top

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Factor structure and psychometric properties of the english version of the trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS-E)

Authors: Katja Petrowski, Sören Kliem, Michael Sadler, Alicia E. Meuret, Thomas Ritz, Elmar Brähler

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Demands placed on individuals in occupational and social settings, as well as imbalances in personal traits and resources, can lead to chronic stress. The Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress (TICS) measures chronic stress while incorporating domain-specific aspects, and has been found to be a highly reliable and valid research tool. The aims of the present study were to confirm the German version TICS factorial structure in an English translation of the instrument (TICS-E) and to report its psychometric properties.

Methods

A random route sample of healthy participants (N = 483) aged 18–30 years completed the TICS-E. The robust maximum likelihood estimation with a mean-adjusted chi-square test statistic was applied due to the sample’s significant deviation from the multivariate normal distribution. Goodness of fit, absolute model fit, and relative model fit were assessed by means of the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and the Tucker Lewis Index (TLI).

Results

Reliability estimates (Cronbach’s α and adjusted split-half reliability) ranged from .84 to .92. Item-scale correlations ranged from .50 to .85. Measures of fit showed values of .052 for RMSEA (Cl = 0.50–.054) and .067 for SRMR for absolute model fit, and values of .846 (TLI) and .855 (CFI) for relative model-fit. Factor loadings ranged from .55 to .91.

Conclusion

The psychometric properties and factor structure of the TICS-E are comparable to the German version of the TICS. The instrument therefore meets quality standards for an adequate measurement of chronic stress.

Abidin R, Flens JR, Austin WG. The parenting stress index. Forensic Uses of Clinical Assessment Instruments. 2006:297–328.

Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

Becker P. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. In: Schwarzer R, editor. Gesundheitspsychologie. Ein Lehrbuch. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1997. p. 517–34.

Becker P, Schulz P, Schlotz W. Persönlichkeit, chronischer Stress und körperliche Gesundheit: Eine prospektive Studie zur Überprüfung eines systemischen Anforderungs-Ressourcen-Modells. Zeitschrift Für Gesundheitspsychologie. 2004;12(1):11–23. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.12.1.11.CrossRef

Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions. 1993;154:136–136.

Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M. Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2006;332(7540):521–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38693.435301.80.

Chou CP, Bentler PM, Satorra A. Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1991;44(Pt 2):347–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1991.tb00966.x.CrossRefPubMed

Cohen S, Edwards JR. Personality characteristics as moderators of the relationship between stress and disorder. In: Advances in the investigation of psychological stress. New York: Neufeld, R. W. J; 1989. p. 235–83.

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU. Measuring stress. A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford; 1997.

11.

Coie JD, Watt NF, West GS, Hawkins JD, Asarnow JR, Markman HJ, et al. The science of prevention: a conceptual framework and some directions for a National Research Program. Am Psychol. 1993;48(10):1013–22.

12.

Eckenrode J, Gore S. Stress between work and family. (Eckenrode J. & Gore S.). New York: plenum press; 1990.

13.

Ehrström S, Kornfeld D, Rylander E, Bohm-Starke N. Chronic stress in women with localised provoked vulvodynia. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(1):73–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802604359.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gannon L, Pardie L. The importance of chronicity and controllability of stress in the context of stress-illness relationships. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1989;12(4):357–72. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2600964.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. Vectors. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019.

16.

Heim E, Willi J. Psychosoziale Medizin Gesundheit und Krankheit in bio-psycho-sozialer Sicht: 2 Klinik und Praxis. Berlin: Springer; 1986.CrossRef

17.

Herbert TB, Cohen S. Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review. Psychosom Med. 1993;55(4):364–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199307000-00004.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

19.

International Test Commission (2005). International Guidelines on Test Adaptation. www.intestcom.org.

20.

Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.

21.

Kessler RC, Price RH, Wortman CB. Social factors in psychopathology: stress, social support, and coping processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 1985; http://doi.org/doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002531.

22.

Krantz DS, Contrada RJ, Durel LA, Hill DR, Friedler E, Lazar JD. Comparative effects of two beta-blockers on cardiovascular reactivity and type a behavior in hypertensives. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1988;50(6):615–26. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2853406.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Lepore SJ. Measurement of chronic stressors. In: Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU, editors. Measuring stress: a guide for health and social scientists. London: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 102–20.

24.

Lepore SJ, Evans GW, Palsane MN. Social hassles and psychological health in the context of chronic crowding. J Health Soc Behav. 1991;32(4):357–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137103.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Marsh H, Hau K-T, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2004;11(3):320–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRef

26.

McEwen, B. S. B. B. S. B. (1998). Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators 1998, 338(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199710023371407.

27.

McGonagle KA, Kessler RC. Chronic stress, acute stress, and depressive symptoms. Am J Community Psychol. 1990;18(5):681–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931237.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Pearlin LI. The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1989;30(3):241–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136956.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Petrowski K, Paul S, Albani C, Brähler E. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS) in a representative German sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Pratt L, Barling J. Differentiating between daily events, acute and chronic stressors: a framework and its implications. In: Hurrell J, Murphy L, Sauter S, Cooper C, editors. Occupational stress: issues and developments in research. New York; 1988. p. 41–53.

31.

Roohafza H, Talaei M, Sadeghi M, Mackie M, Sarafzadegan N. Association between acute and chronic life events on acute coronary syndrome A Case-Control Study. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2010;25(5):E1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181d81799.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02. CrossRef

33.

Scheuch K, H S. Mensch unter Belastung. Stress als ein humanwissenschaftliches Integrationskonzept. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften; 1990.

34.

Schulz P, Hellhammer J, Schlotz W. Arbeitsstress, sozialer Stress und Schlafqualität: Differentielle Effekte unter Berücksichtigung von Alter, Besorgnisneigung und Gesundheit. Zeitschrift Für Gesundheitspsychologie. 2003;11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1026//0943-8149.11.1.1.CrossRef

35.

Schulz P, Schlotz W, Becker P. Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress (TICS). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2004.

36.

Schulz P, Schönpflug W. Regulatory activity during states of stress. Series in Clinical & Community Psychology: Achievement, Stress, & Anxiety. 1982:51–73.

37.

Werner EE. Risk and resilience in individuals with learning disabilities: lessons learned from the Kauai longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 1993;8(1):28–34.

38.

Wheaton B. Sampling the stress universe. In: Avison WR, Gotlib IH, editors. The Plenum series on stress and coping. Stress and mental health: Contemporary issues and prospects for the future; 1994. p. 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1106-3_4.

39.

Wheaton B. The nature of chronic stress. In: Gottlieb B.H. (eds) Coping with Chronic Stress (43-73). The springer series on stress and coping. Boston, MA: springer; 1997.

Title: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the english version of the trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS-E)
Authors: Katja Petrowski
Sören Kliem
Michael Sadler
Alicia E. Meuret
Thomas Ritz
Elmar Brähler
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0471-4

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Factor structure and psychometric properties of the english version of the trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS-E)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Strategies and challenges associated with recruiting retirement village communities and residents into a group exercise intervention

The appropriateness of Bland-Altman’s approximate confidence intervals for limits of agreement

Self-reported measures in health research for people with intellectual disabilities: an inclusive pilot study on suitability and reliability

Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline

Pragmatism in practice: lessons learned during screening and enrollment for a randomised controlled trial in rural northern Ethiopia

A comparison of metrics and performance characteristics of different search strategies for article retrieval for a systematic review of the global epidemiology of kidney and urinary diseases