Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Validity of mobile electronic data capture in clinical studies: a pilot study in a pediatric population

Authors: Belinda von Niederhäusern, Ramon Saccilotto, Sabine Schädelin, Victoria Ziesenitz, Pascal Benkert, Marie-Luise Decker, Anya Hammann, Julia Bielicki, Marc Pfister, Christiane Pauli-Magnus

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinical studies in children are necessary yet conducting multiple visits at study centers remains challenging. The success of “care-at-home” initiatives and remote clinical trials suggests their potential to facilitate conduct of pediatric studies. This pilot aimed to study the feasibility of remotely collecting valid (i.e. complete and correct) saliva samples and clinical data utilizing mobile technology.

Methods

Single-center, prospective pilot study in children undergoing elective tonsillectomy at the University of Basel Children’s Hospital. Data on pain scores and concomitant medication and saliva samples were collected by caregivers on two to four inpatient study days and on three consecutive study days at home. A tailored mobile application developed for this study supported data collection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of complete and correct caregiver-collected data (pain scale) and saliva samples in the at-home setting. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of complete and correct saliva samples in the inpatient setting, subjective feasibility for caregivers, and study cost.

Results

A total number of 23 children were included in the study of which 17 children, median age 6.0 years (IQR 5.0, 7.4), completed the study. During the at-home phase, 71.9% [CI = 64.4, 78.6] of all caregiver-collected pain assessments and 53.9% [CI = 44.2, 63.4] of all saliva samples were complete and correct. Overall, 64.7% [CI = 58.7, 70.4] of all data collected by caregivers at home was complete and correct. The predominant reason for incorrectness of data was adherence to the timing of predefined patient actions. Participating caregivers reported high levels of satisfaction and willingness to participate in similar trials in the future. Study costs for a potential sample size of 100 patients were calculated to be 20% lower for the at-home than for a traditional in-patient study setting.

Conclusions

Mobile device supported studies conducted at home may provide a cost-effective approach to facilitate conduct of clinical studies in children. Given findings in this pilot study, data collection at home may focus on electronic data capture rather than biological sampling.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Daniel Mullins C, Mishra SI. Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Daniel Mullins C, Mishra SI. Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Heinrichs N, Bertram H, Kuschel A, Hahlweg K. Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: barriers to research and program participation. Prev Sci. 2005;6(4):275–86.CrossRefPubMed Heinrichs N, Bertram H, Kuschel A, Hahlweg K. Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: barriers to research and program participation. Prev Sci. 2005;6(4):275–86.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Friend SH. App-enabled trial participation: tectonic shift or tepid rumble? Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(297):297ed210.CrossRef Friend SH. App-enabled trial participation: tectonic shift or tepid rumble? Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(297):297ed210.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Silow-Carroll S, Smith B. Clinical management apps: creating partnerships between providers and patients. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013;30:1–10. Silow-Carroll S, Smith B. Clinical management apps: creating partnerships between providers and patients. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013;30:1–10.
5.
go back to reference Dorsey ER, Venuto C, Venkataraman V, Harris DA, Kieburtz K. Novel methods and technologies for 21st-century clinical trials: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(5):582–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dorsey ER, Venuto C, Venkataraman V, Harris DA, Kieburtz K. Novel methods and technologies for 21st-century clinical trials: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(5):582–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
go back to reference Campbell KR. An apple a day: changing medicine through technology and engagement. Futur Cardiol. 2015;11(3):259–60.CrossRef Campbell KR. An apple a day: changing medicine through technology and engagement. Futur Cardiol. 2015;11(3):259–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anguera JA, Jordan JT, Castaneda D, Gazzaley A, Arean PA. Conducting a fully mobile and randomised clinical trial for depression: access, engagement and expense. BMJ Innov. 2016;2(1):14–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anguera JA, Jordan JT, Castaneda D, Gazzaley A, Arean PA. Conducting a fully mobile and randomised clinical trial for depression: access, engagement and expense. BMJ Innov. 2016;2(1):14–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Murray E, Khadjesari Z, White IR, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, McCambridge J, Thompson SG, Wallace P. Methodological challenges in online trials. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murray E, Khadjesari Z, White IR, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, McCambridge J, Thompson SG, Wallace P. Methodological challenges in online trials. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
go back to reference Turner S, Nunn AJ, Fielding K, Choonara I. Adverse drug reactions to unlicensed and off-label drugs on paediatric wards: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88(9):965–8.CrossRefPubMed Turner S, Nunn AJ, Fielding K, Choonara I. Adverse drug reactions to unlicensed and off-label drugs on paediatric wards: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88(9):965–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Avenel S, Bomkratz A, Dassieu G, Janaud JC, Danan C. The incidence of prescriptions without marketing product license in a neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr. 2000;7(2):143–7.CrossRefPubMed Avenel S, Bomkratz A, Dassieu G, Janaud JC, Danan C. The incidence of prescriptions without marketing product license in a neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr. 2000;7(2):143–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Choonara I. Unlicensed and off-label drug use in children: implications for safety. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004;3(2):81–3.CrossRefPubMed Choonara I. Unlicensed and off-label drug use in children: implications for safety. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004;3(2):81–3.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Roberts R, Rodriguez W, Murphy D, Crescenzi T. Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies. JAMA. 2003;290(7):905–11.CrossRefPubMed Roberts R, Rodriguez W, Murphy D, Crescenzi T. Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies. JAMA. 2003;290(7):905–11.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rodriguez W, Selen A, Avant D, Chaurasia C, Crescenzi T, Gieser G, Di Giacinto J, Huang SM, Lee P, Mathis L, et al. Improving pediatric dosing through pediatric initiatives: what we have learned. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):530–9.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez W, Selen A, Avant D, Chaurasia C, Crescenzi T, Gieser G, Di Giacinto J, Huang SM, Lee P, Mathis L, et al. Improving pediatric dosing through pediatric initiatives: what we have learned. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):530–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Baiardi P, Giaquinto C, Girotto S, Manfredi C, Ceci A. Innovative study design for paediatric clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(1):109–15.CrossRefPubMed Baiardi P, Giaquinto C, Girotto S, Manfredi C, Ceci A. Innovative study design for paediatric clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(1):109–15.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Laughon MM, Benjamin DK Jr, Capparelli EV, Kearns GL, Berezny K, Paul IM, Wade K, Barrett J, Smith PB, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Innovative clinical trial design for pediatric therapeutics. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011;4(5):643–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laughon MM, Benjamin DK Jr, Capparelli EV, Kearns GL, Berezny K, Paul IM, Wade K, Barrett J, Smith PB, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Innovative clinical trial design for pediatric therapeutics. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011;4(5):643–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Bagust A, Haycox A, Sartain SA, Maxwell MJ, Todd P. Economic evaluation of an acute paediatric hospital at home clinical trial. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87(6):489–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bagust A, Haycox A, Sartain SA, Maxwell MJ, Todd P. Economic evaluation of an acute paediatric hospital at home clinical trial. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87(6):489–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009.
22.
go back to reference Baugh RF, Archer SM, Mitchell RB, Rosenfeld RM, Amin R, Burns JJ, Darrow DH, Giordano T, Litman RS, Li KK, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(1 Suppl):S1–30.CrossRefPubMed Baugh RF, Archer SM, Mitchell RB, Rosenfeld RM, Amin R, Burns JJ, Darrow DH, Giordano T, Litman RS, Li KK, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(1 Suppl):S1–30.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Schmerzbehandlung am UKBB (Guidelines for pain management at UKBB), Version 01.2015. University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB). Schmerzbehandlung am UKBB (Guidelines for pain management at UKBB), Version 01.2015. University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB).
25.
go back to reference Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Lundy JJ, O'Donohoe P, O'Gorman H, Malizia W. Capturing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data electronically: the past, present, and promise of ePRO measurement in clinical trials. Patient. 2015;8(4):301–9.CrossRefPubMed Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Lundy JJ, O'Donohoe P, O'Gorman H, Malizia W. Capturing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data electronically: the past, present, and promise of ePRO measurement in clinical trials. Patient. 2015;8(4):301–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validity of mobile electronic data capture in clinical studies: a pilot study in a pediatric population
Authors
Belinda von Niederhäusern
Ramon Saccilotto
Sabine Schädelin
Victoria Ziesenitz
Pascal Benkert
Marie-Luise Decker
Anya Hammann
Julia Bielicki
Marc Pfister
Christiane Pauli-Magnus
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0438-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017 Go to the issue