Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Correspondence

Conducting a team-based multi-sited focused ethnography in primary care

Authors: A.P. Bikker, H. Atherton, H. Brant, T. Porqueddu, J.L. Campbell, A. Gibson, B. McKinstry, C. Salisbury, S. Ziebland

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Focused ethnography is an applied and pragmatic form of ethnography that explores a specific social phenomenon as it occurs in everyday life. Based on the literature a problem-focused research question is formulated before the data collection. The data generation process targets key informants and situations so that relevant results on the pre-defined topic can be obtained within a relatively short time-span. As part of a theory based evaluation of alternative forms of consultation (such as video, phone and email) in primary care we used the focused ethnographic method in a multisite study in general practice across the UK. To date there is a gap in the literature on using focused ethnography in healthcare research.
The aim of the paper is to build on the various methodological approaches in health services research by presenting the challenges and benefits we encountered whilst conducing a focused ethnography in British primary care. Our considerations are clustered under three headings: constructing a shared understanding, dividing the tasks within the team, and the functioning of the focused ethnographers within the broader multi-disciplinary team.
As a result of using this approach we experienced several advantages, like the ability to collect focused data in several settings simultaneously within in a short time-span. Also, the sharing of experiences and interpretations between the researchers contributed to a more holistic understanding of the research topic. However, mechanisms need to be in place to facilitate and synthesise the observations, guide the analysis, and to ensure that all researchers feel engaged. Reflection, trust and flexibility among the team members were crucial to successfully adopt a team focused ethnographic approach. When used for policy focussed applied healthcare research a team-based multi-sited focused ethnography can uncover practices and understandings that would not be apparent through surveys or interviews alone. If conducted with care, it can provide timely findings within the fast moving context of healthcare policy and research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bunce AE, Gold R, Davis JV, McMullen CK, Jaworski V, Mercer M, Nelson C. Ethnographic process evaluation in primary care: explaining the complexity of implementation. BMC Health ServRes. 2014;14:607.CrossRef Bunce AE, Gold R, Davis JV, McMullen CK, Jaworski V, Mercer M, Nelson C. Ethnographic process evaluation in primary care: explaining the complexity of implementation. BMC Health ServRes. 2014;14:607.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nightingale R, Sinha MD, Swallow V. Using focused ethnography in paediatric settings to explore professionals’ and parents’ attitudes towards expertise in managing chronic kidney disease stage 3-5. BMCHealth ServRes. 2014;14:403. Nightingale R, Sinha MD, Swallow V. Using focused ethnography in paediatric settings to explore professionals’ and parents’ attitudes towards expertise in managing chronic kidney disease stage 3-5. BMCHealth ServRes. 2014;14:403.
6.
go back to reference Atkinson P, Hammersley M. Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Strategies of qualitativee inquiry. London: Sage Publications; 1998. p. 346. Atkinson P, Hammersley M. Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Strategies of qualitativee inquiry. London: Sage Publications; 1998. p. 346.
9.
go back to reference Weiss CH. Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future. N Dir Eval. 1997;1997(76):41–55.CrossRef Weiss CH. Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future. N Dir Eval. 1997;1997(76):41–55.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006.CrossRef Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cruz EV, Higginbottom G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Res. 2013;20(4):36–43.CrossRefPubMed Cruz EV, Higginbottom G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Res. 2013;20(4):36–43.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jarzabkowski P, Bednarek R, Cabantous L. Conducting global team-based ethnography: methodological challenges and practical methods. Hum Relat. 2015;68(1):3–33.CrossRef Jarzabkowski P, Bednarek R, Cabantous L. Conducting global team-based ethnography: methodological challenges and practical methods. Hum Relat. 2015;68(1):3–33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Scales K, Bailey S, Lloyd J. Seperately and together; reflections on conducting a collaborative team ethnography in dementia care. Enquire. 2008;6:24–49. Scales K, Bailey S, Lloyd J. Seperately and together; reflections on conducting a collaborative team ethnography in dementia care. Enquire. 2008;6:24–49.
14.
go back to reference Erickson K, Stull D. Doing team ethnography: warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 1998.CrossRef Erickson K, Stull D. Doing team ethnography: warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 1998.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Creese A, Bhatt A, Bhojani N, Martin P. Fieldnotes in team ethnography: researching complementary schools. Qual Res. 2008;8(2):197–215.CrossRef Creese A, Bhatt A, Bhojani N, Martin P. Fieldnotes in team ethnography: researching complementary schools. Qual Res. 2008;8(2):197–215.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Atherton H, Ziebland S. What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare? Digit Health. 2016;2:1–13. Atherton H, Ziebland S. What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare? Digit Health. 2016;2:1–13.
19.
go back to reference Brant H, Atherton H, Ziebland S, McKinstry B, Campbell JL, Salisbury C. Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice: Br. JGenPract. 2016;66(648):e460–6. Brant H, Atherton H, Ziebland S, McKinstry B, Campbell JL, Salisbury C. Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice: Br. JGenPract. 2016;66(648):e460–6.
20.
go back to reference Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, et al. The potential of alternatives to face to faceface-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed methods case study. Health Serv Deliv Res. IN PRESS. Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, et al. The potential of alternatives to face to faceface-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed methods case study. Health Serv Deliv Res. IN PRESS.
21.
go back to reference Platt J. Realities of social research: an empirical study of Brittish sociologists. London: Sussex University Press; 1976. Platt J. Realities of social research: an empirical study of Brittish sociologists. London: Sussex University Press; 1976.
22.
go back to reference O’Reilly K. Team ethnography. In Key Concepts in Ethnography. Int. London: Sage Publishing; 2009. O’Reilly K. Team ethnography. In Key Concepts in Ethnography. Int. London: Sage Publishing; 2009.
23.
go back to reference Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ. 2006;40(5):405–14.CrossRefPubMed Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ. 2006;40(5):405–14.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Ussing reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(1):26–44.CrossRefPubMed Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Ussing reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(1):26–44.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Conducting a team-based multi-sited focused ethnography in primary care
Authors
A.P. Bikker
H. Atherton
H. Brant
T. Porqueddu
J.L. Campbell
A. Gibson
B. McKinstry
C. Salisbury
S. Ziebland
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0422-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017 Go to the issue