Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain

Authors: Fran Toye, Kate Seers, Erin Hannink, Karen Barker

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Each year over five million people develop chronic non-malignant pain and can experience healthcare as an adversarial struggle. The aims of this study were: (1) to bring together qualitative evidence syntheses that explore patients’ experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain and develop conceptual understanding of what it is like to live with chronic non-malignant pain for improved healthcare; (2) to undertake the first mega-ethnography of qualitative evidence syntheses using the methods of meta-ethnography.

Methods

We used the seven stages of meta-ethnography refined for large studies. The innovation of mega-ethnography is to use conceptual findings from qualitative evidence syntheses as primary data. We searched 7 bibliographic databases from inception until February 2016 to identify qualitative evidence syntheses that explored patients’ experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain.

Results

We identified 82 potential studies from 556 titles, screened 34 full text articles and included 11 qualitative evidence syntheses synthesising a total of 187 qualitative studies reporting more than 5000 international participants living with chronic pain. We abstracted concepts into 7 conceptual categories: (1) my life is impoverished and confined; (2) struggling against my body to be me; (3) the quest for the diagnostic ‘holy grail’; (4) lost personal credibility; (5) trying to keep up appearances; (6) need to be treated with dignity; and (7) deciding to end the quest for the grail is not easy. Each conceptual category was supported by at least 7 of the 11 qualitative evidence syntheses.

Conclusions

This is the first mega-ethnography, or synthesis of qualitative evidence syntheses using the methods of meta-ethnography. Findings help us to understand that the decision to end the quest for a diagnosis can leave patients feeling vulnerable and this may contribute to the adversarial nature of the clinical encounter. This knowledge demonstrates that treating a patient with a sense that they are worthy of care and hearing their story is not an adjunct to, but integral to health care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, Daker-White G, Britten N, Pill R, Yardley L, Pope C, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(43).
2.
Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton A. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res. 2007;7:375–422.CrossRef
3.
Hannes K, Macaitis K. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers. Qual Res. 2012;12(4):402–42.CrossRef
4.
Sandelowski M, Barrosso J. Handbook for synthesising qualitative research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007.
5.
Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin CJ, Gülmezoglu M, Noyes J, Booth A, Garside R, Rashidian A. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Med. 2016;12(10):e1001895. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pmed.​1001895 CrossRef
6.
Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donnovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):209–15.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experience of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:671–84.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Malpass A, Shaw A, Sharp D, Walter F, Feder G, Ridd M, Kessler D. “Medication career” or “moral career”? The two sides of managing anti-dperessants: a meta-ethnography of patients experience of antidepressants. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:154–68.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Andrews J, Barker K. A meta-ethnography of patients’ experiences of chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2013;1(12):1–189.CrossRef
10.
Toye F, Seers K, Barker K. A meta-ethnography of patients’ experiences of chronic pelvic pain: struggling to construct chronic pelvic pain as ‘real’. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(12):2713–27.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: Synthesising qualitative studies. California: Sage Publications; 1988.CrossRef
13.
Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative research evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. Economic and Social Research Council Research Methods 2009, National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper Series (01/09).
15.
Frost J, Garside R, Cooper C, Britten N. Meta-study as diagnostic: toward content over form in qualitative synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(3):307–19.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(80).
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Schütz A. Collected Papers 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1962.
22.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. California: Sage Publications; 2006.
23.
Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative Health Research: a guide to methods. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2007.
24.
Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Andrews J, Barker K. ‘Trying to pin down jelly’ - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Forster M. Hegels dialectic method. In: Beiser FC, editor. Cambridge companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
26.
Verbeek J, Sengers M, Riemens L, Haafkens J. Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Spine (03622436). 2004;29(20):2309–19.CrossRef
27.
Georgy EE, Carr EC, Breen AC. Back pain management in primary care: patients’ and doctors’ expectations. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(6):405–13.PubMed
28.
Stella SOE, Schofield P. Systematic review on the literature on culture and pain. J Pain Manag. 2010;3(4):347–54.
29.
Young K, Fisher J, Kirkman M. Women's experiences of endometriosis: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(3):225–34.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Thomsen AB, Sørensen J, Sjøgren P, Eriksen J. Economic evaluation of multidisciplinary pain management in chronic pain patients: a qualitative systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2001;22(2):688–99.CrossRef
31.
Slade C, Patel S, Underwood M, Keating L. What are patient beliefs and perceptions about exercise for nonspecific chronic low back pain?: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(11):995–1006.CrossRefPubMed
32.
O'Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, Leahy I, Bunzli S, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan K. Patient-therapist interactions in musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Physiotherapy (United Kingdom). 2015;101:eS1133–4.
33.
Monsivais D, McNeill J. Multicultural influences on pain medication attitudes and beliefs in patients with nonmalignant chronic pain syndromes. Pain Manag Nurs. 2007;8(2):64–72.CrossRefPubMed
34.
MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E, Workplace-based RG. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Flemming K. Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: an example using critical interpretive synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(1):201–17.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Ogala-Echejoh S, Schofield P. Systematic review on the literature on culture and pain. J Pain Manag. 2010;3(4):347–54.
37.
Taverner T, Closs J, Briggs M. A meta-synthesis of research on leg ulceration and neuropathic pain. Br J Nurs. 2011;20:S18–27.CrossRef
38.
Slade S, Kent P, Patel S, Bucknall T, Buchbinder R. Health care professional clinical practice guideline adherence for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Physiotherapy (United Kingdom). 2015;101.
39.
Le S, Solberg S, Smith-Young J, Snow N. Families and chronic pain: A pilot meta-study of qualitative research. Pain Res Manag. 15(2).
40.
Slade C, Kent P, Bucknall T, Molloy E, Patel S, Buchbinder R. Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4).
41.
Patel AS, Farquharson R, Carroll D, Moore A, Phillips CJ, Taylor RS, Barden J. The impact and burden of chronic pain in the workplace: a qualitative systematic review. Pain Pract. 2012;12(7):578–89.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Gold DT, Roberto KA. Correlates and consequences of chronic pain in older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2000;21(5):270.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Newton BJ, Rothlingova Z, Gutteridge R, LeMarchand K, Raphael JH. No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(6):866–86.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Furnes B, Dysvik E. The experience of chronic pain, loss and grief. Scand J Pain. 2010;1(3):74.CrossRef
45.
McMahon L, Murray C, Sanderson J, Daiches A. ‘Governed by the pain’: narratives of fibromyalgia. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1358–67.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Newton BJ, Southall JL, Raphael JH, Ashford RL, LeMarchand K. A narrative review of the impact of disbelief in chronic pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013;14(3):161–71.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Andrews J, Barker K. Patients’ experiences of chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(617).
48.
Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–72.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Snelgrove S, Liossi C. Living with chronic low back pain: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Chronic Illn. 2013;9(4):283–301.
50.
Souza PP, Salata A, Rosa-E-Silva JC, Candido FR, Nogueira AA, Poli-Neto OB. Qualitative research as the basis for a biopsychosocial approach to women with chronic pelvic pain. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2011;32(4):165–72.
51.
52.
Bunzli S, Watkins R, Smith A, Schütze R, O'Sullivan P. Lives on hold: a qualitative synthesis exploring the experience of chronic low-back pain. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(10):907.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Hopayian K, Notley C. A systematic review of low back pain and sciatica patients’ expectations and experiences of health care. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1769.CrossRefPubMed
54.
MacNeela P, Doyle C, O'Gorman D, Ruane N, McGuire E. Experiences of chronic low back pain: a meta-ethnography of qualitative research. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(1):63.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Parsons S, Harding G, Breen A, Foster N, Pincus T, Vogel S, Underwood M. The influence of patients’ and primary care practitioners’ beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(1):91–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Monsivais DB, Engebretson JC. Cultural cues: review of qualitative evidence of patient-centered care in patients with nonmalignant chronic pain. Rehabil Nurs. 2011;36(4):166–71.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Sim J, Madden S. Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(1):57–67.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Seale C. The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage publications; 1999.CrossRef
59.
Eakin J, Mykhalovskiy E. Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9(2):187–94.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Barbour R. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? Br Med J. 2001;322:1115–7.CrossRef
61.
62.
Baker SE, Edwards R. How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper: Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research 2012. http://​eprints.​ncrm.​ac.​uk/​2273/​. Accessed 12 July 2013.
63.
64.
Frank A. Asking the right question about pain: narrative and phronesis. Lit Med. 2004;23(2):209–25.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Kleinman A. The illness narratives. Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
Metadata
Title
A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain
Authors
Fran Toye
Kate Seers
Erin Hannink
Karen Barker
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0392-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Methodologic considerations in the design and analysis of nested case-control studies: association between cytokines and postoperative delirium

Research article

A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study

Research article

Robust estimation of the expected survival probabilities from high-dimensional Cox models with biomarker-by-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials

Research Article

A nonparametric multiple imputation approach for missing categorical data

Research article

Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment

Research article

Multiple triangulation and collaborative research using qualitative methods to explore decision making in pre-hospital emergency care