Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Mechanisms and mediation in survival analysis: towards an integrated analytical framework

Authors: Jonathan Pratschke, Trutz Haase, Harry Comber, Linda Sharp, Marianna de Camargo Cancela, Howard Johnson

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A wide-ranging debate has taken place in recent years on mediation analysis and causal modelling, raising profound theoretical, philosophical and methodological questions. The authors build on the results of these discussions to work towards an integrated approach to the analysis of research questions that situate survival outcomes in relation to complex causal pathways with multiple mediators. The background to this contribution is the increasingly urgent need for policy-relevant research on the nature of inequalities in health and healthcare.

Methods

The authors begin by summarising debates on causal inference, mediated effects and statistical models, showing that these three strands of research have powerful synergies. They review a range of approaches which seek to extend existing survival models to obtain valid estimates of mediation effects. They then argue for an alternative strategy, which involves integrating survival outcomes within Structural Equation Models via the discrete-time survival model. This approach can provide an integrated framework for studying mediation effects in relation to survival outcomes, an issue of great relevance in applied health research. The authors provide an example of how these techniques can be used to explore whether the social class position of patients has a significant indirect effect on the hazard of death from colon cancer.

Results

The results suggest that the indirect effects of social class on survival are substantial and negative (-0.23 overall). In addition to the substantial direct effect of this variable (-0.60), its indirect effects account for more than one quarter of the total effect. The two main pathways for this indirect effect, via emergency admission (-0.12), on the one hand, and hospital caseload, on the other, (-0.10) are of similar size.

Conclusions

The discrete-time survival model provides an attractive way of integrating time-to-event data within the field of Structural Equation Modelling. The authors demonstrate the efficacy of this approach in identifying complex causal pathways that mediate the effects of a socio-economic baseline covariate on the hazard of death from colon cancer. The results show that this approach has the potential to shed light on a class of research questions which is of particular relevance in health research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
go back to reference Hafeman DM, Schwartz S. Opening the black box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:838–45.CrossRefPubMed Hafeman DM, Schwartz S. Opening the black box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:838–45.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang B, Sivaganesan S, Succop P, Goodman E. Statistical assessment of mediational effects for logistic mediational models. Stat Med. 2004;23:2713–28.CrossRefPubMed Huang B, Sivaganesan S, Succop P, Goodman E. Statistical assessment of mediational effects for logistic mediational models. Stat Med. 2004;23:2713–28.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Iacobucci D. Mediation analysis and categorical variables: the final frontier. J Consum Psychol. 2012;22:582–94.CrossRef Iacobucci D. Mediation analysis and categorical variables: the final frontier. J Consum Psychol. 2012;22:582–94.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15:309–34.CrossRefPubMed Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15:309–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pearl J. The causal mediation formula—a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms. Prev Sci. 2012;13:426–36.CrossRefPubMed Pearl J. The causal mediation formula—a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms. Prev Sci. 2012;13:426–36.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:422–45.CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:422–45.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Davey Smith G. Reflections on the limitations to epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:325–31.CrossRef Davey Smith G. Reflections on the limitations to epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:325–31.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kristensen P, Aalen OO. Understanding mechanisms: opening the “black box” in observational studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:121–4.CrossRefPubMed Kristensen P, Aalen OO. Understanding mechanisms: opening the “black box” in observational studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:121–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.CrossRefPubMed Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol. 1982;13:290–312.CrossRef Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol. 1982;13:290–312.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li Y, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Estimation of the mediation effect with a binary mediator. Stat Med. 2006;26:3398–414.CrossRef Li Y, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Estimation of the mediation effect with a binary mediator. Stat Med. 2006;26:3398–414.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Aalen OO. Armitage lecture 2010: understanding treatment effects: the value of integrating longitudinal data and survival analysis. Stat Med. 2012;31:1903–17.CrossRefPubMed Aalen OO. Armitage lecture 2010: understanding treatment effects: the value of integrating longitudinal data and survival analysis. Stat Med. 2012;31:1903–17.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3:143–55.CrossRefPubMed Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3:143–55.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pearl J. Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Pearl J. Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
19.
go back to reference Holland PW. Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:945–60.CrossRef Holland PW. Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:945–60.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, van der Laan MJ. Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology. 2006;17:276–84.CrossRefPubMed Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, van der Laan MJ. Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology. 2006;17:276–84.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jung SY, Rosenzweig M, Linkov F, Brufsky A, Weissfeld JL, Sereika SM. Comorbidity as a mediator of survival disparity between younger and older women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Hypertension. 2011;59:205–11.CrossRefPubMed Jung SY, Rosenzweig M, Linkov F, Brufsky A, Weissfeld JL, Sereika SM. Comorbidity as a mediator of survival disparity between younger and older women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Hypertension. 2011;59:205–11.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Tuomilehto J, Salonen J. Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:934–42.CrossRefPubMed Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Tuomilehto J, Salonen J. Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:934–42.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lange T, Hansen JV. Direct and indirect effects in a survival context. Epidemiology. 2011;22:575–81.CrossRefPubMed Lange T, Hansen JV. Direct and indirect effects in a survival context. Epidemiology. 2011;22:575–81.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tchetgen EJ. On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome. Int J Biostat. 2011;7:1–38.CrossRef Tchetgen EJ. On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome. Int J Biostat. 2011;7:1–38.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Robins JM. Association, causation, and marginal structural models. Synthese. 1999;121:151–79.CrossRef Robins JM. Association, causation, and marginal structural models. Synthese. 1999;121:151–79.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gerhard T, Delaney JA, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Shuster J, Brumback BA, Johnson JA, et al. Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gerhard T, Delaney JA, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Shuster J, Brumback BA, Johnson JA, et al. Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Fosen J, Ferkingstad E, Borgan Ø, Aalen OO. Dynamic path analysis—a new approach to analyzing time-dependent covariates. Lifetime Data Anal. 2006;12:143–67.CrossRefPubMed Fosen J, Ferkingstad E, Borgan Ø, Aalen OO. Dynamic path analysis—a new approach to analyzing time-dependent covariates. Lifetime Data Anal. 2006;12:143–67.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Martinussen T, Vansteelandt S. On collapsibility and confounding bias in Cox and Aalen regression models. Lifetime Data Anal. 2013;19:279–96.CrossRefPubMed Martinussen T, Vansteelandt S. On collapsibility and confounding bias in Cox and Aalen regression models. Lifetime Data Anal. 2013;19:279–96.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Greenwich: IAP; 2006. Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Greenwich: IAP; 2006.
30.
go back to reference Gunzler D, Chen T, Wu P, Zhang H. Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25:390–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Gunzler D, Chen T, Wu P, Zhang H. Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25:390–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Ditlevsen S, Christensen U, Lynch J, Damsgaard MT, Keiding N. The mediation proportion: a structural equation approach for estimating the proportion of exposure effect on outcome explained by an intermediate variable. Epidemiology. 2005;16:114–20.CrossRefPubMed Ditlevsen S, Christensen U, Lynch J, Damsgaard MT, Keiding N. The mediation proportion: a structural equation approach for estimating the proportion of exposure effect on outcome explained by an intermediate variable. Epidemiology. 2005;16:114–20.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Iacobucci D, Saldanha N, Deng X. A meditation on mediation: evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. J Consum Psychol. 2007;17:139–53.CrossRef Iacobucci D, Saldanha N, Deng X. A meditation on mediation: evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. J Consum Psychol. 2007;17:139–53.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Singer JD, Willett JB. It’s about time: using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. J Educ Stat. 1993;18:155–95.CrossRef Singer JD, Willett JB. It’s about time: using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. J Educ Stat. 1993;18:155–95.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Muthén B, Masyn K. Discrete-time survival mixture analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005;30:27–58.CrossRef Muthén B, Masyn K. Discrete-time survival mixture analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005;30:27–58.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO. MPlus: statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2010. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. MPlus: statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2010.
37.
go back to reference Brown CC. On the use of indicator variables for studying the time-dependence of parameters in a response-time model. Biometrics. 1975;31:863–72.CrossRefPubMed Brown CC. On the use of indicator variables for studying the time-dependence of parameters in a response-time model. Biometrics. 1975;31:863–72.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2006. Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.
39.
go back to reference Asparouhov T, Masyn K, Muthén BO. Continuous time survival in latent variable models. Proceedings of the joint statistical meeting in Seattle (ASA Section on Biometrics). 2006. p. 180–7. Asparouhov T, Masyn K, Muthén BO. Continuous time survival in latent variable models. Proceedings of the joint statistical meeting in Seattle (ASA Section on Biometrics). 2006. p. 180–7.
40.
go back to reference Economic and Social Research Institute. Activity in acute public hospitals in Ireland, annual report 2012. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute; 2013. Economic and Social Research Institute. Activity in acute public hospitals in Ireland, annual report 2012. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute; 2013.
41.
go back to reference Haase T, Pratschke J. The pobal-haase deprivation index for small areas. Dublin: Pobal; 2010. Haase T, Pratschke J. The pobal-haase deprivation index for small areas. Dublin: Pobal; 2010.
42.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. Fort Washington: NCCN; 2015. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. Fort Washington: NCCN; 2015.
44.
go back to reference Muthén BO. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. J Econom. 1983;22:43–65.CrossRef Muthén BO. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. J Econom. 1983;22:43–65.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Winship C, Mare RD. Structural equations and path analysis for discrete data. Am J Sociol. 1983;89:54–110.CrossRef Winship C, Mare RD. Structural equations and path analysis for discrete data. Am J Sociol. 1983;89:54–110.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hellevik O. Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Qual Quant. 2007;43:59–74.CrossRef Hellevik O. Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Qual Quant. 2007;43:59–74.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mechanisms and mediation in survival analysis: towards an integrated analytical framework
Authors
Jonathan Pratschke
Trutz Haase
Harry Comber
Linda Sharp
Marianna de Camargo Cancela
Howard Johnson
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0130-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016 Go to the issue