Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A comparison of videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in predicted difficult airway: a feasibility study

Authors: Maria Vargas, Antonio Pastore, Fulvio Aloj, John G. Laffey, Giuseppe Servillo

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Videolaryngoscopy has become increasingly attractive for the routine management of the difficult airway. Glidescope® is well studied in the literature while imago V-Blade® is a recent videolaryngoscope. This is a feasibility study with 1:1 case-control sequential allocation comparing Imago V-Blade ® and Glidescope® in predicted difficult airway settings.

Methods

Two senior anesthesiologists with no clinical experience in video assisted intubation but previously trained in a simulated scenario, performed the endotracheal intubations with Imago V-Blade® and Glidescope®. A third experienced anesthesiologist supervised the procedures. Forty-two patients, 21 for each group, with the presence of predicted difficult airway according to the Italian guideline were included. The primary end point is the feasibility of intubation. The secondary end-points are the success to intubate in the first attempt, the intubation time, the Cormack and Lehane score view, the comparison of the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score and the need for maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation comparing Imago V-Blade® and Glidescope®.

Results

The intubation was achieved in 100% of cases in both groups. No differences were found in the first-attempt success rate (p = 0.383), intubation time (p = 0.280), Cormack and Lehane score view (p = 0.799) and IDS score (p = 0.252). Statistical differences were found in external laryngeal pressure (p = 0.005), advancement of the blade (p = 0.024) and use of increasing lifting force (p = 0.048).

Conclusions

This feasibility study showed that the intubation with the newly introduced Imago V-Blade® is feasible. Further randomized and/or non-inferiority trials are needed to evaluate the benefit of Imago V-Blade® in this procedure.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02897518. Retrospectively registered 25 August 2016
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:32–7.CrossRefPubMed Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:32–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bruck S, Trautner H, Wolff A, Hain J, Mols G, Pakos P, Roewer N, Lange M. Comparison of the C-MAC® and Glidescope® videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine disorders and immobilization. Anaestehsia. 2015;70:160–5.CrossRef Bruck S, Trautner H, Wolff A, Hain J, Mols G, Pakos P, Roewer N, Lange M. Comparison of the C-MAC® and Glidescope® videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine disorders and immobilization. Anaestehsia. 2015;70:160–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference SIAARTI task force for difficult airway. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:617–57. SIAARTI task force for difficult airway. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:617–57.
4.
go back to reference Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemassy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS). Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1290–7.CrossRefPubMed Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemassy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS). Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1290–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723–30.CrossRefPubMed Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Liu EHC, Goy RWL, Tan BH, Asai T. Tracheal intubation with videolaryngosocpes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope®and the Glidescope®. Br J Anesth. 2009;103:446–51.CrossRef Liu EHC, Goy RWL, Tan BH, Asai T. Tracheal intubation with videolaryngosocpes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope®and the Glidescope®. Br J Anesth. 2009;103:446–51.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aziz MF, Abrons RO, Cattano D, Bayman EO, Swanson DE, Hagberg CA, Todd MM, Brambrink AM. First-attempt intubation success of video laryngoscopy in patients with anticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the C-MAC D-blade versus the Glidescope in a mixed provider and diverse patient population. Anesth Analg. 2015. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001084. Aziz MF, Abrons RO, Cattano D, Bayman EO, Swanson DE, Hagberg CA, Todd MM, Brambrink AM. First-attempt intubation success of video laryngoscopy in patients with anticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the C-MAC D-blade versus the Glidescope in a mixed provider and diverse patient population. Anesth Analg. 2015. doi:10.​1213/​ANE.​0000000000001084​.
8.
go back to reference Corda DM, Riutort KT, Leone AJ, Qureshi MK, Heckman MG, Brull SJ. Effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on glottic visualization during glidescope videolaryngoscopy. J Anesth. 2012;26:362–8.CrossRefPubMed Corda DM, Riutort KT, Leone AJ, Qureshi MK, Heckman MG, Brull SJ. Effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on glottic visualization during glidescope videolaryngoscopy. J Anesth. 2012;26:362–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:240–7.CrossRefPubMed Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:240–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Niforpoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Videolaryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthsiol Scand. 2010;54:1050–61.CrossRef Niforpoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Videolaryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthsiol Scand. 2010;54:1050–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Khepterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anaesthesiol. 2012;12:32.CrossRef Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Khepterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anaesthesiol. 2012;12:32.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinicalexperience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:191–8.CrossRefPubMed Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinicalexperience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:191–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. Glidescope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:531–4.CrossRefPubMed Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. Glidescope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:531–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS®, Glidescope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anesth. 2009;103:761–8.CrossRef Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS®, Glidescope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anesth. 2009;103:761–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope® videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:41–52.CrossRefPubMed Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope® videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:41–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A comparison of videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in predicted difficult airway: a feasibility study
Authors
Maria Vargas
Antonio Pastore
Fulvio Aloj
John G. Laffey
Giuseppe Servillo
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0318-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2017 Go to the issue