Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Efficacy and safety of DFN-11 (sumatriptan injection, 3 mg) in adults with episodic migraine: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Authors: Stephen Landy, Sagar Munjal, Elimor Brand-Schieber, Alan M. Rapoport

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In a previous randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept study in rapidly escalating migraine, a 3 mg dose of subcutaneous sumatriptan (DFN-11) was associated with fewer and shorter triptan sensations than a 6 mg dose. The primary objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of acute treatment with DFN-11 compared with placebo in episodic migraine.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study of DFN-11 in the acute treatment of adults with episodic migraine (study RESTOR). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects taking DFN-11 who were pain free at 2 h postdose in the double-blind period compared with placebo. Secondary endpoints included earlier postdose timepoints, assessments of pain relief and subjects’ freedom from their most bothersome symptom (MBS) (among nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia). Safety and tolerability were assessed.

Results

A total of 392 subjects was screened, 268 (68.4%) were randomized, and 234 (87.3% of those randomized) completed the double-blind treatment period. The proportion of subjects who were pain free at 2 h postdose was significantly greater in the DFN-11 group than in the placebo group (51.0% vs 30.8%, P  =  0.0023). Compared with placebo, significantly higher proportions of subjects treated with DFN-11 were also pain free at 30, 60, and 90 min postdose (P  ≤  0.0195). DFN-11 was significantly superior to placebo for pain relief at 60 min, 90 min, and 2 h postdose (P ≤ 0.0179). At 2 h postdose, DFN-11 was also significantly superior to placebo for freedom from photophobia (P  =  0.0056) and phonophobia (P  =  0.0167). Overall, 33.3% (37/111) who received DFN-11 and 13.4% (16/119) who received placebo experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the most common of which were injection site swelling (7.2% vs 0.8%) and pain (7.2% vs 5.9%). Chest discomfort was about half as common in the DFN-11 treatment group as it was in the placebo group (0.9% vs 1.7%).

Conclusions

This study met its primary endpoint, pain freedom at 2 h postdose, with DFN-11 significantly better than placebo, and the incidence of TEAEs and triptan sensations with DFN-11 was low. The 3 mg dose of sumatriptan in DFN-11 appears to be an effective alternative to a 6 mg SC dose of sumatriptan, with good safety and tolerability. (clinicaltrials.​gov: NCT02569853; registered 07 October 2015).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) (2013). Cephalalgia 33:629–808 Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) (2013). Cephalalgia 33:629–808
3.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S et al (2001) Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American migraine study II. Headache 41:646–657CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S et al (2001) Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American migraine study II. Headache 41:646–657CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M et al (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M et al (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK et al (2011) Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the international burden of migraine study (IBMS). Cephalalgia 31:301–315CrossRefPubMed Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK et al (2011) Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the international burden of migraine study (IBMS). Cephalalgia 31:301–315CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D et al (2010) Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:428–432CrossRefPubMed Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D et al (2010) Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:428–432CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Buse DC, Manack AN, Serrano D et al (2008) Summary of disability, treatment and healthcare utilization differences between chronic migraine and episodic migraine populations. Headache 48:S18 Buse DC, Manack AN, Serrano D et al (2008) Summary of disability, treatment and healthcare utilization differences between chronic migraine and episodic migraine populations. Headache 48:S18
8.
go back to reference Silberstein SD (2000) Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of neurology. Neurology 55:754–762CrossRefPubMed Silberstein SD (2000) Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of neurology. Neurology 55:754–762CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ (2015) The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the American headache society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache 55:3–20CrossRefPubMed Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ (2015) The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the American headache society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache 55:3–20CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Worthington I, Pringsheim T, Gawel MJ et al (2013) Canadian headache society guideline: acute drug therapy for migraine headache. Can J Neurol Sci 40:S1–s80CrossRefPubMed Worthington I, Pringsheim T, Gawel MJ et al (2013) Canadian headache society guideline: acute drug therapy for migraine headache. Can J Neurol Sci 40:S1–s80CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sarchielli P, Granella F, Prudenzano MP et al (2012) Italian guidelines for primary headaches: 2012 revised version. J Headache Pain 13(Suppl 2):S31–S70CrossRefPubMed Sarchielli P, Granella F, Prudenzano MP et al (2012) Italian guidelines for primary headaches: 2012 revised version. J Headache Pain 13(Suppl 2):S31–S70CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Evers S, Afra J, Frese A et al (2009) EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine--revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 16:968–981CrossRefPubMed Evers S, Afra J, Frese A et al (2009) EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine--revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 16:968–981CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Haag G, Diener HC, May A et al (2011) Self-medication of migraine and tension-type headache: summary of the evidence-based recommendations of the deutsche Migrane und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG), the deutsche Gesellschaft fur Neurologie (DGN), the Osterreichische Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (OKSG) and the Schweizerische Kopfwehgesellschaft (SKG). J Headache Pain 12:201–217CrossRefPubMed Haag G, Diener HC, May A et al (2011) Self-medication of migraine and tension-type headache: summary of the evidence-based recommendations of the deutsche Migrane und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG), the deutsche Gesellschaft fur Neurologie (DGN), the Osterreichische Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (OKSG) and the Schweizerische Kopfwehgesellschaft (SKG). J Headache Pain 12:201–217CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena PR, Dahlof C et al (2000) Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: a review and European consensus. Brain 123(Pt 1):9–18CrossRefPubMed Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena PR, Dahlof C et al (2000) Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: a review and European consensus. Brain 123(Pt 1):9–18CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB et al (2001) Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet 358:1668–1675CrossRefPubMed Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB et al (2001) Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet 358:1668–1675CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lionetto L, Negro A, Casolla B et al (2012) Sumatriptan succinate: pharmacokinetics of different formulations in clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother 13:2369–2380CrossRefPubMed Lionetto L, Negro A, Casolla B et al (2012) Sumatriptan succinate: pharmacokinetics of different formulations in clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother 13:2369–2380CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gallagher RM, Kunkel R (2003) Migraine medication attributes important for patient compliance: concerns about side effects may delay treatment. Headache 43:36–43CrossRefPubMed Gallagher RM, Kunkel R (2003) Migraine medication attributes important for patient compliance: concerns about side effects may delay treatment. Headache 43:36–43CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mathew NT, Dexter J, Couch J et al (1992) Dose ranging efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. US Sumatriptan Research Group Arch Neurol 49:1271–1276CrossRefPubMed Mathew NT, Dexter J, Couch J et al (1992) Dose ranging efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. US Sumatriptan Research Group Arch Neurol 49:1271–1276CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Andre AD, Brand-Schieber E, Ramirez M, Munjal S, Kumar R (2017) Subcutaneous sumatriptan delivery devices: comparative ease of use and preference among migraineurs. Patient Prefer Adherence 11:121-129 Andre AD, Brand-Schieber E, Ramirez M, Munjal S, Kumar R (2017) Subcutaneous sumatriptan delivery devices: comparative ease of use and preference among migraineurs. Patient Prefer Adherence 11:121-129
22.
go back to reference Cady RK, Munjal S, Cady RJ et al (2017) Randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing DFN-11 injection (3 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan) with 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of rapidly-escalating attacks of episodic migraine. J Headache Pain 18:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cady RK, Munjal S, Cady RJ et al (2017) Randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing DFN-11 injection (3 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan) with 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of rapidly-escalating attacks of episodic migraine. J Headache Pain 18:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55 Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55
25.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N et al (2012) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 32:6–38CrossRefPubMed Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N et al (2012) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 32:6–38CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM (2002) What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 42(Suppl 1):3–9CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM (2002) What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 42(Suppl 1):3–9CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gendolla A (2005) Part I: what do patients really need and want from migraine treatment? Curr Med Res Opin 21(Suppl 3):S3–S7CrossRefPubMed Gendolla A (2005) Part I: what do patients really need and want from migraine treatment? Curr Med Res Opin 21(Suppl 3):S3–S7CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Menshawy A, Ahmed H, Ismail A et al (2018) Intranasal sumatriptan for acute migraine attacks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 39:31–44CrossRefPubMed Menshawy A, Ahmed H, Ismail A et al (2018) Intranasal sumatriptan for acute migraine attacks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 39:31–44CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Silberstein S, Winner PK, Mcallister PJ et al (2017) Early onset of efficacy and consistency of response across multiple migraine attacks from the randomized COMPASS study: AVP-825 breath powered((R)) exhalation delivery system (sumatriptan nasal powder) vs oral sumatriptan. Headache 57:862–876CrossRefPubMed Silberstein S, Winner PK, Mcallister PJ et al (2017) Early onset of efficacy and consistency of response across multiple migraine attacks from the randomized COMPASS study: AVP-825 breath powered((R)) exhalation delivery system (sumatriptan nasal powder) vs oral sumatriptan. Headache 57:862–876CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Munjal S, Gautam A, Offman E et al (2016) A randomized trial comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of DFN-02, an intranasal sumatriptan spray containing a permeation enhancer, with intranasal and subcutaneous sumatriptan in healthy adults. Headache 56:1455–1465CrossRefPubMed Munjal S, Gautam A, Offman E et al (2016) A randomized trial comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of DFN-02, an intranasal sumatriptan spray containing a permeation enhancer, with intranasal and subcutaneous sumatriptan in healthy adults. Headache 56:1455–1465CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Rapoport AM (2018) DFN-02 (sumatriptan 10 mg with a permeation enhancer) nasal spray vs placebo in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 58(5):676–687 Lipton RB, Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Rapoport AM (2018) DFN-02 (sumatriptan 10 mg with a permeation enhancer) nasal spray vs placebo in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 58(5):676–687
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of DFN-11 (sumatriptan injection, 3 mg) in adults with episodic migraine: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Authors
Stephen Landy
Sagar Munjal
Elimor Brand-Schieber
Alan M. Rapoport
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0881-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2018 Go to the issue