Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Letter

The burden of high-risk surgery and the potential benefit of goal-directed strategies

Author: Frederic Michard

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

The survey by Cannesson and colleagues [1] in the previous issue of Critical Care shows that only around 16% of anesthetists (5.4% of 210 US respondents and 30.4% of 158 European respondents) use a specific treatment protocol (that is, follow a goal-directed strategy) for the peri-operative hemodynamic management of patients undergoing high-risk surgery. In 2008, Weiser and colleagues [2] estimated the global volume of surgery to be 234.2 million procedures a year. According to Pearse and colleagues [3], high-risk surgical procedures represent around 12.5% of this total. A meta-analysis of the 29 randomized controlled trials investigating the value of peri-operative goal-directed strategies reported an average mortality rate of 9.4% in control groups and a significantly reduced mortality rate of 5.9% when a goal-directed strategy was adopted [4]. When putting all the pieces of this puzzle together, one can estimate that around 860,000 lives could potentially be saved every year (the equivalent of one life every 37 seconds) if such strategies became the standard of care around the world (Table 1).
Table 1
Estimates of the potential worldwide benefit of peri-operative goal-directed strategies
 
Yearly estimation
Reference
All surgical procedures
234,200,000
Weiser et al. [2]
   High-risk surgical procedures (12.5%)
29,275,000
Pearse et al. [3]
   High-risk procedures without GDS (84%)
24,591,000
Cannesson et al. [1]
Deaths without GDS (9.4%)
2,311,554
Hamilton et al. [4]
Deaths if GDS were to be adopted (5.9%)
1,450,869
Hamilton et al. [4]
Lives potentially saved if GDS were to be adopted
860,685
-
Complications without GDS (29.8%)
7,328,118
Hamilton et al. [4]
Complications if GDS were to be adopted (18.0%)
4,426,380
Hamilton et al. [4]
Complications potentially avoided if GDS were to be adopted
2,901,738
-
GDS, goal-directed strategies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A: Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care 2011, 15: R197. 10.1186/cc10364PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A: Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care 2011, 15: R197. 10.1186/cc10364PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Gawande AA: An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008, 372: 139-144. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8CrossRefPubMed Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Gawande AA: An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008, 372: 139-144. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pearse RM, Harrison DA, James P, Watson D, Hinds C, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED: Identification and characterization of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care 2006, 10: R81. 10.1186/cc4928PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Pearse RM, Harrison DA, James P, Watson D, Hinds C, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED: Identification and characterization of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care 2006, 10: R81. 10.1186/cc4928PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011, 112: 1392-1402. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5CrossRefPubMed Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011, 112: 1392-1402. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The burden of high-risk surgery and the potential benefit of goal-directed strategies
Author
Frederic Michard
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 5/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10473

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Critical Care 5/2011 Go to the issue