Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Arthritis Research & Therapy 5/2013

Open Access 01-10-2013 | Research article

Development and assessment of floor and ceiling items for the PROMIS physical function item bank

Authors: Bonnie Bruce, James Fries, Bharathi Lingala, Yusra Nazar Hussain, Eswar Krishnan

Published in: Arthritis Research & Therapy | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Disability and Physical Function (PF) outcome assessment has had limited ability to measure functional status at the floor (very poor functional abilities) or the ceiling (very high functional abilities). We sought to identify, develop and evaluate new floor and ceiling items to enable broader and more precise assessment of PF outcomes for the NIH Patient-Reported-Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Methods

We conducted two cross-sectional studies using NIH PROMIS item improvement protocols with expert review, participant survey and focus group methods. In Study 1, respondents with low PF abilities evaluated new floor items, and those with high PF abilities evaluated new ceiling items for clarity, importance and relevance. In Study 2, we compared difficulty ratings of new floor items by low functioning respondents and ceiling items by high functioning respondents to reference PROMIS PF-10 items. We used frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations to analyze the data.

Results

In Study 1, low (n = 84) and high (n = 90) functioning respondents were mostly White, women, 70 years old, with some college, and disability scores of 0.62 and 0.30. More than 90% of the 31 new floor and 31 new ceiling items were rated as clear, important and relevant, leaving 26 ceiling and 30 floor items for Study 2. Low (n = 246) and high (n = 637) functioning Study 2 respondents were mostly White, women, 70 years old, with some college, and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores of 1.62 and 0.003. Compared to difficulty ratings of reference items, ceiling items were rated to be 10% more to greater than 40% more difficult to do, and floor items were rated to be about 12% to nearly 90% less difficult to do.

Conclusions

These new floor and ceiling items considerably extend the measurable range of physical function at either extreme. They will help improve instrument performance in populations with broad functional ranges and those concentrated at one or the other extreme ends of functioning. Optimal use of these new items will be assisted by computerized adaptive testing (CAT), reducing questionnaire burden and insuring item administration to appropriate individuals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bruce B, Fries J: The Stanford health assessment questionnaire (HAQ): a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol. 2003, 30: 167-178.PubMed Bruce B, Fries J: The Stanford health assessment questionnaire (HAQ): a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol. 2003, 30: 167-178.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY: The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982, 9: 789-793.PubMed Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY: The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982, 9: 789-793.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30: 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30: 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cella D, Chang CH: A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care. 2000, 38 (Suppl): II66-72.PubMed Cella D, Chang CH: A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care. 2000, 38 (Suppl): II66-72.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Khanna D, Krishnan E, Dewitt EM, Khanna PP, Spiegel B, Hays RD: The future of measuring patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011, 63 (Suppl 11): S486-490.CrossRef Khanna D, Krishnan E, Dewitt EM, Khanna PP, Spiegel B, Hays RD: The future of measuring patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011, 63 (Suppl 11): S486-490.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B: Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011, 13: R147-10.1186/ar3461.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B: Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011, 13: R147-10.1186/ar3461.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Bruce B, Fries JF: The Arthritis, Rheumatism and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS): still young at 30 years. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005, 23 (5 Suppl 39): S163-167.PubMed Bruce B, Fries JF: The Arthritis, Rheumatism and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS): still young at 30 years. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005, 23 (5 Suppl 39): S163-167.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hubert HB, Bloch DA, Oehlert JW, Fries JF: Lifestyle habits and compression of morbidity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002, 57: M347-351. 10.1093/gerona/57.6.M347.CrossRefPubMed Hubert HB, Bloch DA, Oehlert JW, Fries JF: Lifestyle habits and compression of morbidity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002, 57: M347-351. 10.1093/gerona/57.6.M347.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lane NE, Bloch DA, Wood PD, Fries JF: Aging, long-distance running, and the development of musculoskeletal disability. A controlled study. Am J Med. 1987, 82: 772-780. 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90014-3.CrossRefPubMed Lane NE, Bloch DA, Wood PD, Fries JF: Aging, long-distance running, and the development of musculoskeletal disability. A controlled study. Am J Med. 1987, 82: 772-780. 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90014-3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR: Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23: 137-145. 10.1002/art.1780230202.CrossRefPubMed Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR: Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23: 137-145. 10.1002/art.1780230202.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Krishnan E, Sokka T, Hakkinen A, Hubert H, Hannonen P: Normative values for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50: 953-960. 10.1002/art.20048.CrossRefPubMed Krishnan E, Sokka T, Hakkinen A, Hubert H, Hannonen P: Normative values for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50: 953-960. 10.1002/art.20048.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bruce B, Fries JF, Ambrosini D, Lingala B, Gandek B, Rose M, Ware JE: Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009, 11: R191-10.1186/ar2890.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bruce B, Fries JF, Ambrosini D, Lingala B, Gandek B, Rose M, Ware JE: Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009, 11: R191-10.1186/ar2890.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B: Improved responsiveness of physical function (disability) scales based upon item response theory (IRT). The 2009 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific MeetingPhiladelphia, 16-21 October 2009. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60 (Suppl): S229- Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B: Improved responsiveness of physical function (disability) scales based upon item response theory (IRT). The 2009 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific MeetingPhiladelphia, 16-21 October 2009. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60 (Suppl): S229-
16.
go back to reference Jette AM, Tulsky DS, Ni P, Kisala PA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Tate DG, Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Houlihan B, Williams S, Kirshblum S, Dyson-Hudson T, Zanca J, Fyffe D: Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury-functional index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012, 93: 1733-1750. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.008.CrossRefPubMed Jette AM, Tulsky DS, Ni P, Kisala PA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Tate DG, Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Houlihan B, Williams S, Kirshblum S, Dyson-Hudson T, Zanca J, Fyffe D: Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury-functional index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012, 93: 1733-1750. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.008.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tulsky DS, Jette AM, Kisala PA, Kalpakjian C, Dijkers MP, Whiteneck G, Ni P, Kirshblum S, Charlifue S, Heinemann AW, Forchheimer M, Slavin MD, Houlihan B, Tate DG, Dyson-Hudson T, Fyffe DG, Williams S, Zanca J: Spinal cord injury-functional index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012, 93: 1722-1732. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.007.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Tulsky DS, Jette AM, Kisala PA, Kalpakjian C, Dijkers MP, Whiteneck G, Ni P, Kirshblum S, Charlifue S, Heinemann AW, Forchheimer M, Slavin MD, Houlihan B, Tate DG, Dyson-Hudson T, Fyffe DG, Williams S, Zanca J: Spinal cord injury-functional index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012, 93: 1722-1732. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.007.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and assessment of floor and ceiling items for the PROMIS physical function item bank
Authors
Bonnie Bruce
James Fries
Bharathi Lingala
Yusra Nazar Hussain
Eswar Krishnan
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy / Issue 5/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1478-6362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4327

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Arthritis Research & Therapy 5/2013 Go to the issue