Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Evaluating the concordance of physician judgments and patient preferences on AIDS/HIV therapy - a Discrete Choice Experiment

Authors: Axel C Mühlbacher, Matthias Stoll, Jörg Mahlich, Matthias Nübling

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Patient-centered health care and shared decision making are of increasing importance in the management of AIDS/HIV patients and require an intensive consideration of patient preferences. The present study assesses expectations and needs of patients from the physician point of view. The aim of this study was to compare patient and physician perspectives of relevant aspects of treatment quality such as effectiveness, quality of life and further treatment options.

Methods

The study was performed as an anonymous survey including German physicians. Physicians treating large numbers of AIDS/HIV patients were preferably contacted. The physicians were asked to assess their view of patient preferences of therapy characteristics using direct measurement, as well as by means of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The questionnaire was adopted from a previous study in which AIDS/HIV patients were asked to assess their treatment preferences.

Results

131 physicians completed the questionnaire, 88% of these on paper and 12% online. 70% of the physicians were male. The mean duration since licensure was 17 years. The most frequent specialist areas were internal medicine (N = 55), infectiology (N = 31) and general medicine (N = 27). In the direct measurement the most relevant therapy characteristics were “drug does not affect or not affect appearance much”, “self-application of the drug is possible” and “rarely occurring longer periods of nausea and diarrhea”. Six treatment characteristics were selected and used to generate eight virtual pairs of therapies. To evaluate the assessments a random effect logit model was employed. In view of the physicians avoidance of an obvious perceptibility of the disease the emotional quality of life had by far the strongest impact on the patients’ treatment preferences as rated by physicians. With some distance the physical quality of life with less diarrhea or nausea, as well as the possibility to participate in social life followed on the same level.

Conclusions

Discrete Choice Experiment proved to be a valid survey technique in the evaluation of AIDS/HIV treatment preferences as assessed by patients and by physicians assessing the view of their patients. Covering a broad range of treatment characteristics, the physician assessments of preferences were very close to those of AIDS/HIV patients emphasizing the high impact of quality of life, in particular the emotional quality of life on patient preferences in the selection of treatments. Thus, the selection of particular treatment options should be accompanied by a deliberate consideration of treatment features, which need to be considered in order to maximize patient adherence and compliance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pichenot M, Deuffic-Burban S, Cuzin L, et al.: Efficacy of new antiretroviral drugs in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials. HIV Med 2012, 13: 148–155.PubMed Pichenot M, Deuffic-Burban S, Cuzin L, et al.: Efficacy of new antiretroviral drugs in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials. HIV Med 2012, 13: 148–155.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Barasa SS: True story about HIV: theory of viral sequestration and reserve infection. HIV/AIDS - Res Palliat Care 2011, 3: 125–133.CrossRef Barasa SS: True story about HIV: theory of viral sequestration and reserve infection. HIV/AIDS - Res Palliat Care 2011, 3: 125–133.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Pneumocystis pneumonia -- Los Angeles. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981, 30: 250–252. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Pneumocystis pneumonia -- Los Angeles. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981, 30: 250–252.
5.
go back to reference Chen YQ, Masse B, Wang L, et al.: Statistical considerations for the HPTN 052 study to evaluate the effectiveness of early versus delayed antiretroviral strategies to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1 in serodiscordant couples. Contemp Clin Trials 2012,33(6):1280–1286. 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.007PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chen YQ, Masse B, Wang L, et al.: Statistical considerations for the HPTN 052 study to evaluate the effectiveness of early versus delayed antiretroviral strategies to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1 in serodiscordant couples. Contemp Clin Trials 2012,33(6):1280–1286. 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.007PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO): Adherence to long term therapies – evidence for action. 2003. World Health Organization (WHO): Adherence to long term therapies – evidence for action. 2003.
7.
go back to reference Grierson J, Koelmeyer RL, Smith A, et al.: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: factors independently associated with reported difficulty taking antiretroviral therapy in a national sample of HIV-positive Australians. HIV Medicine 2011, 12: 562–569. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00928.xPubMedCrossRef Grierson J, Koelmeyer RL, Smith A, et al.: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: factors independently associated with reported difficulty taking antiretroviral therapy in a national sample of HIV-positive Australians. HIV Medicine 2011, 12: 562–569. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00928.xPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Verfahrensordnung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses (G-BA) in der Fassung vom 18. Dezember 2008 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 84a (Beilage) vom 10. Juni 2009 in Kraft getreten am 1. April 2009, zuletzt geändert am 18. Oktober 2012 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 05.12.2012 B3, in Kraft getreten am 6. Dezember 2012 . Downloaded on January 16th, 2013 http://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62–492–654/VerfO_2012–10–18.pdf Verfahrensordnung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses (G-BA) in der Fassung vom 18. Dezember 2008 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 84a (Beilage) vom 10. Juni 2009 in Kraft getreten am 1. April 2009, zuletzt geändert am 18. Oktober 2012 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 05.12.2012 B3, in Kraft getreten am 6. Dezember 2012 . Downloaded on January 16th, 2013 http://​www.​g-ba.​de/​downloads/​62–492–654/​VerfO_​2012–10–18.​pdf
12.
go back to reference Mühlbacher AC, Stoll M, Mahlich J, Nübling M: Evaluating Patients’ preferences for AIDS/HIV therapy - a Discrete choice experiment. Health Econ Rev 2013, 3: 14. 10.1186/2191-1991-3-14PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mühlbacher AC, Stoll M, Mahlich J, Nübling M: Evaluating Patients’ preferences for AIDS/HIV therapy - a Discrete choice experiment. Health Econ Rev 2013, 3: 14. 10.1186/2191-1991-3-14PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mühlbacher AC, Nübling M: Analysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ 2011,12(3):193–203. 10.1007/s10198-010-0218-6PubMedCrossRef Mühlbacher AC, Nübling M: Analysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ 2011,12(3):193–203. 10.1007/s10198-010-0218-6PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miller TW, Rake D, Sumimoto T, Hollman PS: Reliability and comparability of choice-based measures: online and paper-and-pencil methods of administration. Victoria, BC, Canada: Sawtooth Software Conference; 2001. Miller TW, Rake D, Sumimoto T, Hollman PS: Reliability and comparability of choice-based measures: online and paper-and-pencil methods of administration. Victoria, BC, Canada: Sawtooth Software Conference; 2001.
15.
go back to reference Johnson R, Orme BK: Getting the most from CBC, Sawtooth Software Research 41 Paper Series . 2003. Johnson R, Orme BK: Getting the most from CBC, Sawtooth Software Research 41 Paper Series . 2003.
16.
go back to reference Lancaster KJ: A new approach to consumer theory. J Politic Econ 1966, 74: 132–157. 10.1086/259131CrossRef Lancaster KJ: A new approach to consumer theory. J Politic Econ 1966, 74: 132–157. 10.1086/259131CrossRef
17.
go back to reference McFadden D: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in economics. Edited by: Zarembka P. New York: Academic; 1974. McFadden D: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in economics. Edited by: Zarembka P. New York: Academic; 1974.
18.
go back to reference Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR: Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1985. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR: Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1985.
19.
go back to reference Mühlbacher AC, Bethge S, Tockhorn A: Präferenzmessung im Gesundheitswesen: Grundlagen von Discrete-Choice-Experimenten. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2013, 1: 17–44. Mühlbacher AC, Bethge S, Tockhorn A: Präferenzmessung im Gesundheitswesen: Grundlagen von Discrete-Choice-Experimenten. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2013, 1: 17–44.
20.
go back to reference Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2000.CrossRef Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2000.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH: Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2005.CrossRef Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH: Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2005.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M: Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.CrossRef Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M: Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bradley M: User’s Manual for SPEED Version 2.1 Stated preference experiment editor and designer. Hague Consulting Group: Hague; 1991. Bradley M: User’s Manual for SPEED Version 2.1 Stated preference experiment editor and designer. Hague Consulting Group: Hague; 1991.
24.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T: Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64: 1738–1753. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007PubMedCrossRef Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T: Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64: 1738–1753. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Stone VE, Jordan J, Tolson J, et al.: Perspectives on adherence and simplicity for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Self-report of the relative importance of multiple attributes of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in predicting adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004, 36: 808–816. 10.1097/00126334-200407010-00007PubMedCrossRef Stone VE, Jordan J, Tolson J, et al.: Perspectives on adherence and simplicity for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Self-report of the relative importance of multiple attributes of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in predicting adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004, 36: 808–816. 10.1097/00126334-200407010-00007PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Beusterien KM, Dziekan K, Flood E, et al.: Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health 2005, 8: 453–461. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00036.xPubMedCrossRef Beusterien KM, Dziekan K, Flood E, et al.: Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health 2005, 8: 453–461. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00036.xPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mühlbacher A, Juhnke C: Patients preferences versus physicians judgments: does it make a difference in health care decision-making? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013,11(3):163–180. 10.1007/s40258-013-0023-3PubMedCrossRef Mühlbacher A, Juhnke C: Patients preferences versus physicians judgments: does it make a difference in health care decision-making? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013,11(3):163–180. 10.1007/s40258-013-0023-3PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Slawik L, Schmeding A, et al.: A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia. Health Expect 2011,16(2):164–176.PubMedCrossRef Bridges JF, Slawik L, Schmeding A, et al.: A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia. Health Expect 2011,16(2):164–176.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the concordance of physician judgments and patient preferences on AIDS/HIV therapy - a Discrete Choice Experiment
Authors
Axel C Mühlbacher
Matthias Stoll
Jörg Mahlich
Matthias Nübling
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-30

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Health Economics Review 1/2013 Go to the issue