Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Patient preferences for HIV/AIDS therapy - a discrete choice experiment

Authors: Axel C Mühlbacher, Matthias Stoll, Jörg Mahlich, Matthias Nübling

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

An increasing emphasis on patient-centred health care and shared decision making requires an intensive consideration of patient preferences. In the present study, patient preferences regarding treatment of HIV/AIDS were explored using direct assessment and discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Methods

Based on literature research about preferences of HIV/AIDS patients we conducted a qualitative pre-study. The results were used to compose a questionnaire on relevant aspects of HIV/AIDS treatment which underwent a pre-test. In the subsequent quantitative study phase presented here, the following data were collected online or on paper including socio-demographic data, SF12v2, data on HIV/AIDS, antiretroviral treatment and patient preferences for therapy characteristics using direct measurement, as well as a discrete choice experiment.

Results

218 patients completed the quantitative main study, 82% of these on paper. 86% were male and the most frequent age group was between 45 and 54 years (37.6%). The SF12v2 showed a mean value of 43 points for the “mental health” component sum score. In the direct measurement the most relevant therapy characteristics were “Self-application of the drug (at home or on-the-go) possible”, “Drug has very high efficacy (reduction of viral load)” and “Long term (hidden) damage (e.g. organ damage) is unlikely”. Based on a factor analysis, six treatment characteristics were selected and used to generate eight virtual therapies. To evaluate the patient assessments a random effect logit model was employed. All of the characteristics were statistically significant predictors of the model of patient preference. The most important therapy characteristic was that the disease is not obvious for others.

Conclusions

The main result is the high impact of quality of life, in particular the emotional quality of life on patient preferences on the selection of treatments. Thus, the selection of particular treatment options should be accompanied by a deliberate consideration of treatment features, which need to be considered in order to maximize patient adherence and compliance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pichenot M, Deuffic-Burban S, Cuzin L: Efficacy of new antiretroviral drugs in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials. HIV Med 2012, 13: 148–155.PubMed Pichenot M, Deuffic-Burban S, Cuzin L: Efficacy of new antiretroviral drugs in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials. HIV Med 2012, 13: 148–155.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Thompson MA, Aberg JA, Hoy JF: Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2012 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA panel. JAMA 2012, 308: 387–402. 10.1001/jama.2012.7961PubMed Thompson MA, Aberg JA, Hoy JF: Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2012 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA panel. JAMA 2012, 308: 387–402. 10.1001/jama.2012.7961PubMed
3.
go back to reference Case KK, Ghys PD, Gouws E: Understanding the modes of transmission model of new HIV infection and its use in prevention planning. Bull World Health Organ 2012, 90: 831–838A. 10.2471/BLT.12.102574PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Case KK, Ghys PD, Gouws E: Understanding the modes of transmission model of new HIV infection and its use in prevention planning. Bull World Health Organ 2012, 90: 831–838A. 10.2471/BLT.12.102574PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Pneumocystis pneumonia – Los Angeles. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981, 30: 250–252. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Pneumocystis pneumonia – Los Angeles. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981, 30: 250–252.
7.
go back to reference Grierson J, Koelmeyer RL, Smith A: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: factors independently associated with reported difficulty taking antiretroviral therapy in a national sample of HIV-positive Australians. HIV Med 2011, 12: 562–569. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00928.xPubMedCrossRef Grierson J, Koelmeyer RL, Smith A: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: factors independently associated with reported difficulty taking antiretroviral therapy in a national sample of HIV-positive Australians. HIV Med 2011, 12: 562–569. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00928.xPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Train K: Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2003.CrossRef Train K: Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2003.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bridges J, Onukwugha E, Johnson F: Patient preference methods–a patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connections 2007, 13: 4–7. Bridges J, Onukwugha E, Johnson F: Patient preference methods–a patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connections 2007, 13: 4–7.
13.
go back to reference Lancaster KJ: A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74: 132–157. 10.1086/259131CrossRef Lancaster KJ: A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74: 132–157. 10.1086/259131CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McFadden D: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in Economics. Edited by: Zarembka P. New York: Academic Press; 1974. McFadden D: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in Economics. Edited by: Zarembka P. New York: Academic Press; 1974.
15.
go back to reference Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR: Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1985. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR: Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1985.
16.
go back to reference Mühlbacher AC, Juhnke C, Bethge S: Experts’ judgment on patient-centered coordinated care. Value Health 2010,13(7):A337.CrossRef Mühlbacher AC, Juhnke C, Bethge S: Experts’ judgment on patient-centered coordinated care. Value Health 2010,13(7):A337.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Telser H: Nutzenmessung im Gesundheitswesen: Die Methode der Discrete-Choice-Experimente. Hamburg: Kovac; 2002. Telser H: Nutzenmessung im Gesundheitswesen: Die Methode der Discrete-Choice-Experimente. Hamburg: Kovac; 2002.
18.
go back to reference Street DJ, Burgess L: The construction of optimal stated choice experiments, theory and methods. New Jersey: Wiley; 2007.CrossRef Street DJ, Burgess L: The construction of optimal stated choice experiments, theory and methods. New Jersey: Wiley; 2007.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bradley M: User’s Manual for SPEED Version 2.1 Stated preference experiment editor and designer. Hague Consulting Group: Hague; 1991. Bradley M: User’s Manual for SPEED Version 2.1 Stated preference experiment editor and designer. Hague Consulting Group: Hague; 1991.
20.
go back to reference Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2000.CrossRef Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2000.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH: Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2005.CrossRef Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH: Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2005.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Kinter ET, Kidane L: Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1982–2007. Patient 2008, 1: 273–282. 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00009PubMedCrossRef Bridges JF, Kinter ET, Kidane L: Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1982–2007. Patient 2008, 1: 273–282. 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00009PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M: Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.CrossRef Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M: Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T: Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64: 1738–1753. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007PubMedCrossRef Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T: Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64: 1738–1753. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jansen K, Brockmeyer NH, Hahn M: Epidemiological composition, clinical and treatment characteristics of the patient cohort of the German competence network for HIV/AIDS. Eur J Med Res 2009, 14: 415–425.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jansen K, Brockmeyer NH, Hahn M: Epidemiological composition, clinical and treatment characteristics of the patient cohort of the German competence network for HIV/AIDS. Eur J Med Res 2009, 14: 415–425.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stone VE, Jordan J, Tolson J: Perspectives on adherence and simplicity for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Self-report of the relative importance of multiple attributes of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in predicting adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004, 36: 808–816. 10.1097/00126334-200407010-00007PubMedCrossRef Stone VE, Jordan J, Tolson J: Perspectives on adherence and simplicity for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Self-report of the relative importance of multiple attributes of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in predicting adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004, 36: 808–816. 10.1097/00126334-200407010-00007PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Beusterien KM, Dziekan K, Flood E: Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health 2005, 8: 453–461. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00036.xPubMedCrossRef Beusterien KM, Dziekan K, Flood E: Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health 2005, 8: 453–461. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00036.xPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bätzing-Feigenbaum J, Kollan C, Kühne A: Cohort profile: the German ClinSurv HIV project – a multicentre open clinical cohort study supplementing national HIV surveillance. HIV Med 2011, 12: 269–278. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00879.xPubMedCrossRef Bätzing-Feigenbaum J, Kollan C, Kühne A: Cohort profile: the German ClinSurv HIV project – a multicentre open clinical cohort study supplementing national HIV surveillance. HIV Med 2011, 12: 269–278. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00879.xPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI): HIV-Infektionen und AIDS-Erkrankungen in Deutschland. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2011, 21: 172–198. Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI): HIV-Infektionen und AIDS-Erkrankungen in Deutschland. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2011, 21: 172–198.
Metadata
Title
Patient preferences for HIV/AIDS therapy - a discrete choice experiment
Authors
Axel C Mühlbacher
Matthias Stoll
Jörg Mahlich
Matthias Nübling
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-14

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Health Economics Review 1/2013 Go to the issue