Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Head & Neck Oncology 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Review

English law for the surgeon I: Consent, capacity and Competence

Authors: Waseem Jerjes, Jaspal Mahil, Tahwinder Upile

Published in: Head & Neck Oncology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Traditionally, in the United Kingdom and Europe the surgeon was generally not troubled by litigation from patients presenting as elective as well as emergency cases, but this aspect of custom has changed. Litigation by patients now significantly affects surgical practice and vicarious liability often affects hospitals. We discuss some fundamental legal definitions, a must to know for a surgeon, and highlight some interesting cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health: Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. 2001 Department of Health: Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. 2001
2.
go back to reference General Medical Council: Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008 General Medical Council: Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008
3.
go back to reference Law and Medical Ethics. 2006, Ch 9, Mason & McCall Smith's, 7 Law and Medical Ethics. 2006, Ch 9, Mason & McCall Smith's, 7
4.
go back to reference Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). 1992, 4 All ER 649 at 653 Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). 1992, 4 All ER 649 at 653
5.
go back to reference World Medical Association: Declaration on the rights of the patient. (1981, amended 1995) World Medical Association: Declaration on the rights of the patient. (1981, amended 1995)
6.
go back to reference Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory proceedings: Medical and Welfare Decisions for Adults who Lack capacity). 2001, 2 FLR 158 Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory proceedings: Medical and Welfare Decisions for Adults who Lack capacity). 2001, 2 FLR 158
7.
go back to reference British Medical Association: Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment: guidance for decision making. 2001, para 9.1, 2 British Medical Association: Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment: guidance for decision making. 2001, para 9.1, 2
8.
9.
11.
go back to reference Kennedy I: Treat Me Right. 57-8. (OUP Oxford 1988) Kennedy I: Treat Me Right. 57-8. (OUP Oxford 1988)
12.
14.
go back to reference Lord Devlin: Samples of law making. 1962, 90- Lord Devlin: Samples of law making. 1962, 90-
16.
go back to reference Bolton Hospitals NHS Trust v O: 2003, 1 FLR824, [2003] Fam Law 319 Bolton Hospitals NHS Trust v O: 2003, 1 FLR824, [2003] Fam Law 319
18.
19.
go back to reference Williamson v: 1998, East London and City Health Authority, 41BMLR 85, [1998] Lloyds's Rep Med 6 Williamson v: 1998, East London and City Health Authority, 41BMLR 85, [1998] Lloyds's Rep Med 6
20.
go back to reference Re F: Mental Patient: Sterilisation. 1990, 2 AC 1 HL Re F: Mental Patient: Sterilisation. 1990, 2 AC 1 HL
21.
go back to reference 2001, In Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation) Fam 15 2001, In Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation) Fam 15
23.
25.
go back to reference Re D: (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation). 1976, 2 WLR 279 Re D: (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation). 1976, 2 WLR 279
26.
27.
go back to reference Re B: A Minor. 1987, 2 WLR 1213 [1988] AC 199 Re B: A Minor. 1987, 2 WLR 1213 [1988] AC 199
28.
go back to reference Re A: (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Separation). 2001, Fam 147 CA Re A: (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Separation). 2001, Fam 147 CA
29.
go back to reference A Metropolitan Borough Council v DB: 1997, 1 FLR 767 A Metropolitan Borough Council v DB: 1997, 1 FLR 767
30.
go back to reference Gillick v: 1984, West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA, QB 581 Gillick v: 1984, West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA, QB 581
31.
go back to reference Department of Health: 2001, Seeking consent: working with children Department of Health: 2001, Seeking consent: working with children
33.
go back to reference Buller T: Competence and risk relativity. 2001, Bioethics, 15: 93-109. Buller T: Competence and risk relativity. 2001, Bioethics, 15: 93-109.
34.
go back to reference Department of Health: Seeking consent: working with older people. 2001 Department of Health: Seeking consent: working with older people. 2001
35.
go back to reference British Medical Association: Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment: guidance for decision making. 2001, paras 9.1-9.3, 2 British Medical Association: Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment: guidance for decision making. 2001, paras 9.1-9.3, 2
36.
go back to reference Re T: Adult: Refusal of Treatment. 1993, Fam 95 Re T: Adult: Refusal of Treatment. 1993, Fam 95
37.
go back to reference W Healthcare NHS Trust v H: 2004, EWCA Civ 1324 W Healthcare NHS Trust v H: 2004, EWCA Civ 1324
38.
go back to reference Re AK: (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment: Consent). 2001, 1 FLR 129 Re AK: (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment: Consent). 2001, 1 FLR 129
39.
go back to reference Re E: (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment). Ibid Re E: (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment). Ibid
40.
go back to reference Re W, Fam 64 CA; South West Hertfordshire Health Authority v B: 1993, [1994] 2 FCR 1051 Re W, Fam 64 CA; South West Hertfordshire Health Authority v B: 1993, [1994] 2 FCR 1051
41.
go back to reference Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing: 2001 Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing: 2001
Metadata
Title
English law for the surgeon I: Consent, capacity and Competence
Authors
Waseem Jerjes
Jaspal Mahil
Tahwinder Upile
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Head & Neck Oncology / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1758-3284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-41

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Head & Neck Oncology 1/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine