Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Review

Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force

Authors: Hubert Labelle, Stephens B Richards, Marinus De Kleuver, Theodoros B Grivas, Keith D K Luk, Hee Kit Wong, John Thometz, Marie Beauséjour, Isabelle Turgeon, Daniel Y T Fong

Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Routine screening of scoliosis is a controversial subject and screening efforts vary greatly around the world.

Methods

Consensus was sought among an international group of experts (seven spine surgeons and one clinical epidemiologist) using a modified Delphi approach. The consensus achieved was based on careful analysis of a recent critical review of the literature on scoliosis screening, performed using a conceptual framework of analysis focusing on five main dimensions: technical, clinical, program, cost and treatment effectiveness.

Findings

A consensus was obtained in all five dimensions of analysis, resulting in 10 statements and recommendations. In summary, there is scientific evidence to support the value of scoliosis screening with respect to technical efficacy, clinical, program and treatment effectiveness, but there insufficient evidence to make a statement with respect to cost effectiveness. Scoliosis screening should be aimed at identifying suspected cases of scoliosis that will be referred for diagnostic evaluation and confirmed, or ruled out, with a clinically significant scoliosis. The scoliometer is currently the best tool available for scoliosis screening and there is moderate evidence to recommend referral with values between 5 degrees and 7 degrees. There is moderate evidence that scoliosis screening allows for detection and referral of patients at an earlier stage of the clinical course, and there is low evidence suggesting that scoliosis patients detected by screening are less likely to need surgery than those who did not have screening. There is strong evidence to support treatment by bracing.

Interpretation

This information statement by an expert panel supports scoliosis screening in 4 of the 5 domains studied, using a framework of analysis which includes all of the World Health Organisation criteria for a valid screening procedure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grivas TB, Wade MH, Negrini S: SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today?. Scoliosis. 2007, 2: 17-10.1186/1748-7161-2-17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grivas TB, Wade MH, Negrini S: SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today?. Scoliosis. 2007, 2: 17-10.1186/1748-7161-2-17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979, 121: 1193-1254. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979, 121: 1193-1254.
3.
go back to reference Richards BS, Vitale MG: Statement: screening for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: an information statement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008, 90: 195-198.CrossRefPubMed Richards BS, Vitale MG: Statement: screening for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: an information statement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008, 90: 195-198.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference United States Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 1996, Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2 United States Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 1996, Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2
6.
go back to reference Beauséjour : The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation. Scoliosis. 2013, 8: 12-10.1186/1748-7161-8-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beauséjour : The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation. Scoliosis. 2013, 8: 12-10.1186/1748-7161-8-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Downs SH, Black N: The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998, 52: 377-384. 10.1136/jech.52.6.377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Downs SH, Black N: The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998, 52: 377-384. 10.1136/jech.52.6.377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Wilson JMG, Jungner G: Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health papers No 34. 1968, Geneva: World health Organization Wilson JMG, Jungner G: Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health papers No 34. 1968, Geneva: World health Organization
9.
go back to reference Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau D: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997, 79: 664-674.PubMed Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau D: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997, 79: 664-674.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD: Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 1-3.PubMed Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD: Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 1-3.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J: Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine. 2010, 35: 1285-1293.CrossRefPubMed Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J: Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine. 2010, 35: 1285-1293.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kane WJ: Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop. 1997, 126: 43-46. Kane WJ: Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop. 1997, 126: 43-46.
13.
go back to reference Last JM: A Dictionary of Public Health. Ed. JM Last. 2006, England: Oxford University Press, 407- Last JM: A Dictionary of Public Health. Ed. JM Last. 2006, England: Oxford University Press, 407-
14.
go back to reference Ashworth MA, Hancock JA, Ashworth L, Tessier KA: Scoliosis screening an approach to cost/benefit analysis. Spine. 1988, 13: 1187-1188. 10.1097/00007632-198810000-00024.CrossRefPubMed Ashworth MA, Hancock JA, Ashworth L, Tessier KA: Scoliosis screening an approach to cost/benefit analysis. Spine. 1988, 13: 1187-1188. 10.1097/00007632-198810000-00024.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee CF, Fong DY, Cheung KM: Referral criteria for school scoliosis screening: assessment and recommendations based on a large longitudinally followed cohort. Spine. 2010, 35: E1492-E1498. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ecf3fe.CrossRefPubMed Lee CF, Fong DY, Cheung KM: Referral criteria for school scoliosis screening: assessment and recommendations based on a large longitudinally followed cohort. Spine. 2010, 35: E1492-E1498. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ecf3fe.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Luk DK, Lee CF, Cheung KM: Clinical effectiveness of school screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a large population-based retrospective cohort study. Spine. 2010, 35: 1607-1614. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7cb8c.CrossRefPubMed Luk DK, Lee CF, Cheung KM: Clinical effectiveness of school screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a large population-based retrospective cohort study. Spine. 2010, 35: 1607-1614. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7cb8c.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fong DYT, Lee CF, Cheung KM: A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine. 2010, 35: 1061-1071.CrossRefPubMed Fong DYT, Lee CF, Cheung KM: A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine. 2010, 35: 1061-1071.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Feldman D, Beauséjour M, Sosa JF, Goulet L, Parent S, Labelle L: Cost effectiveness of school screening for scoliosis: a systematic review. Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2014, 7 (1): 00-00. In Press Feldman D, Beauséjour M, Sosa JF, Goulet L, Parent S, Labelle L: Cost effectiveness of school screening for scoliosis: a systematic review. Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2014, 7 (1): 00-00. In Press
19.
go back to reference Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB: Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. New Eng J Med. 2013, 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337 Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB: Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. New Eng J Med. 2013, 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337
Metadata
Title
Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force
Authors
Hubert Labelle
Stephens B Richards
Marinus De Kleuver
Theodoros B Grivas
Keith D K Luk
Hee Kit Wong
John Thometz
Marie Beauséjour
Isabelle Turgeon
Daniel Y T Fong
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2397-1789
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-8-17

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2013 Go to the issue