Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Study protocol

Shared communication processes within healthcare teams for rare diseases and their influence on healthcare professionals' innovative behavior and patient satisfaction

Authors: Henrike Hannemann-Weber, Maura Kessel, Karolina Budych, Carsten Schultz

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A rare disease is a pattern of symptoms that afflicts less than five in 10,000 patients. However, as about 6,000 different rare disease patterns exist, they still have significant epidemiological relevance. We focus on rare diseases that affect multiple organs and thus demand that multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCPs) work together. In this context, standardized healthcare processes and concepts are mainly lacking, and a deficit of knowledge induces uncertainty and ambiguity. As such, individualized solutions for each patient are needed. This necessitates an intensive level of innovative individual behavior and thus, adequate idea generation. The final implementation of new healthcare concepts requires the integration of the expertise of all healthcare team members, including that of the patients. Therefore, knowledge sharing between HCPs and shared decision making between HCPs and patients are important. The objective of this study is to assess the contribution of shared communication and decision-making processes in patient-centered healthcare teams to the generation of innovative concepts and consequently to improvements in patient satisfaction.

Methods

A theoretical framework covering interaction processes and explorative outcomes, and using patient satisfaction as a measure for operational performance, was developed based on healthcare management, innovation, and social science literature. This theoretical framework forms the basis for a three-phase, mixed-method study. Exploratory phase I will first involve collecting qualitative data to detect central interaction barriers within healthcare teams. The results are related back to theory, and testable hypotheses will be derived. Phase II then comprises the testing of hypotheses through a quantitative survey of patients and their HCPs in six different rare disease patterns. For each of the six diseases, the sample should comprise an average of 30 patients with six HCP per patient-centered healthcare team. Finally, in phase III, qualitative data will be generated via semi-structured telephone interviews with patients to gain a deeper understanding of the communication processes and initiatives that generate innovative solutions.

Discussion

The findings of this proposed study will help to elucidate the necessity of individualized innovative solutions for patients with rare diseases. Therefore, this study will pinpoint the primary interaction and communication processes in multidisciplinary teams, as well as the required interplay between exploratory outcomes and operational performance. Hence, this study will provide healthcare institutions and HCPs with results and information essential for elaborating and implementing individual care solutions through the establishment of appropriate interaction and communication structures and processes within patient-centered healthcare teams.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC: Work Group Diversity. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006, 58: 515-541.CrossRef van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC: Work Group Diversity. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006, 58: 515-541.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jackson SE, May KE, Whitney K: Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations. Edited by: Guzzo RA, Sala E. 1995, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 204-261. Jackson SE, May KE, Whitney K: Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations. Edited by: Guzzo RA, Sala E. 1995, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 204-261.
4.
go back to reference William KY, O'Reilly CA: Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior. Edited by: Staw B, Sutton R. 1998, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 77-140. William KY, O'Reilly CA: Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior. Edited by: Staw B, Sutton R. 1998, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 77-140.
5.
go back to reference Downey K, Slocum J: Uncertainty: Measurers, research and sources of variation. Academy of Management Journal. 1975, 18: 562-572. 10.2307/255685.CrossRef Downey K, Slocum J: Uncertainty: Measurers, research and sources of variation. Academy of Management Journal. 1975, 18: 562-572. 10.2307/255685.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schneck RE, Pennings JM: A strategic contingencies theory of intra-organisational power. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1971, 16: 216-229. 10.2307/2391831.CrossRef Schneck RE, Pennings JM: A strategic contingencies theory of intra-organisational power. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1971, 16: 216-229. 10.2307/2391831.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kogut B, Zander U: Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science. 1992, 3 (Suppl 1): 383-397.CrossRef Kogut B, Zander U: Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science. 1992, 3 (Suppl 1): 383-397.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Davenport TH, Prusak L: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. 1998, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press Davenport TH, Prusak L: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. 1998, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
9.
go back to reference Grant R: Toward knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 1996, 27: 109-122.CrossRef Grant R: Toward knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 1996, 27: 109-122.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol R: Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implementation Science. 2006, 1: 2-10.1186/1748-5908-1-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol R: Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implementation Science. 2006, 1: 2-10.1186/1748-5908-1-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Argote L: Organizational Learning. Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. 1999, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers Argote L: Organizational Learning. Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. 1999, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers
12.
go back to reference Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L: Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996, 41 (Suppl 1): 116-145.CrossRef Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L: Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996, 41 (Suppl 1): 116-145.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsai W: Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44: 996-1004. 10.2307/3069443.CrossRef Tsai W: Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44: 996-1004. 10.2307/3069443.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jansen J, Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H: Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?. Academy of Management Journal. 2005, 48 (Suppl 6): 999-1016.CrossRef Jansen J, Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H: Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?. Academy of Management Journal. 2005, 48 (Suppl 6): 999-1016.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bakker M, Leender R, Gabby SM, Kratzer J, van Engelen J: Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. The Learning Organization. 2006, 13 (Suppl 6): 594-605. Bakker M, Leender R, Gabby SM, Kratzer J, van Engelen J: Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. The Learning Organization. 2006, 13 (Suppl 6): 594-605.
16.
go back to reference Granovetter M: The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 1973, 78 (Suppl 6): 1360-1380.CrossRef Granovetter M: The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 1973, 78 (Suppl 6): 1360-1380.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Van Wijk R, Jansen JJP, Lyles MA: Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies. 2008, 45: 830-853. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x.CrossRef Van Wijk R, Jansen JJP, Lyles MA: Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies. 2008, 45: 830-853. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Charles CAG, Whelan T: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine. 1997, 44 (Suppl 5): 681-692.CrossRef Charles CAG, Whelan T: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine. 1997, 44 (Suppl 5): 681-692.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Härter M: The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling. 2010, 80 (Suppl 1): 94-99.CrossRefPubMed Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Härter M: The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling. 2010, 80 (Suppl 1): 94-99.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Scott SG, Bruce RA: Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal. 1994, 37 (Suppl 3): 580-607.CrossRef Scott SG, Bruce RA: Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal. 1994, 37 (Suppl 3): 580-607.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fleuren MK, Wiefferink , Paulussen T: Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. International journal for quality in health care: journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care. 2004, 16 (Suppl 2): 107-123.CrossRef Fleuren MK, Wiefferink , Paulussen T: Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. International journal for quality in health care: journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care. 2004, 16 (Suppl 2): 107-123.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference De Dreu CKW, West MA: Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001, 86 (Suppl 6): 1191-1201.CrossRefPubMed De Dreu CKW, West MA: Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001, 86 (Suppl 6): 1191-1201.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference May C, Allison G, Chapple A, Chew-Graham CA, Dixon C, Gask L, Graham R, Rogers A, Roland M: Framing the doctor-patient relationship in chronic illness: a comparative study of general practitioners' accounts. Sociology of Health and Illness. 26 (Suppl 2): 135-158. May C, Allison G, Chapple A, Chew-Graham CA, Dixon C, Gask L, Graham R, Rogers A, Roland M: Framing the doctor-patient relationship in chronic illness: a comparative study of general practitioners' accounts. Sociology of Health and Illness. 26 (Suppl 2): 135-158.
24.
go back to reference Oliver RL: A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research. 1980, 17 (Suppl 4): 460-470.CrossRef Oliver RL: A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research. 1980, 17 (Suppl 4): 460-470.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Liao H, Chuang A: A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. 2004, 47 (Suppl 1): 41-58.CrossRef Liao H, Chuang A: A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. 2004, 47 (Suppl 1): 41-58.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company
27.
28.
go back to reference Strauss AL, Corbin J: Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 1990, 19: 418-427. Strauss AL, Corbin J: Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 1990, 19: 418-427.
29.
go back to reference Zhou J, George JM: When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44 (Suppl 2): 682-696.CrossRef Zhou J, George JM: When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44 (Suppl 2): 682-696.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Möller-Leimkühler AM, Dunkel R, Müller P, Pukies G, de Fazio S, Lehmann E: Is patient satisfaction a unidimensional construct? - Factor analysis of the Munich Patient Satisfaction Scale (MPSS-24). European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2002, 252 (Suppl 1): 19-23.CrossRefPubMed Möller-Leimkühler AM, Dunkel R, Müller P, Pukies G, de Fazio S, Lehmann E: Is patient satisfaction a unidimensional construct? - Factor analysis of the Munich Patient Satisfaction Scale (MPSS-24). European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2002, 252 (Suppl 1): 19-23.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Webber SS, Donahue LM: Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management. 2001, 27: 141-162.CrossRef Webber SS, Donahue LM: Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management. 2001, 27: 141-162.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Harrison DA, Klein KJ: What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review. 2007, 49: 305-326.CrossRef Harrison DA, Klein KJ: What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review. 2007, 49: 305-326.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Blau PM: Inequality and heterogeneity. 1977, New York: Free Press Blau PM: Inequality and heterogeneity. 1977, New York: Free Press
34.
go back to reference Gladys ER, Tummers G, van Merode GG, Landeweerd JA: Organizational Characteristics as Predictors of Nurses' Psychological Work. Organization Studies. 2006, 27: 559-584. Gladys ER, Tummers G, van Merode GG, Landeweerd JA: Organizational Characteristics as Predictors of Nurses' Psychological Work. Organization Studies. 2006, 27: 559-584.
35.
go back to reference Mintzberg H: Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. 1983, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Mintzberg H: Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. 1983, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
36.
go back to reference Perrow C: Complex organizations: A critical essay. 1986, Dallas, Texas: Scott, Foresman & Cy Perrow C: Complex organizations: A critical essay. 1986, Dallas, Texas: Scott, Foresman & Cy
Metadata
Title
Shared communication processes within healthcare teams for rare diseases and their influence on healthcare professionals' innovative behavior and patient satisfaction
Authors
Henrike Hannemann-Weber
Maura Kessel
Karolina Budych
Carsten Schultz
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-40

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Implementation Science 1/2011 Go to the issue