Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Effectiveness of strategies to encourage general practitioners to accept an offer of free access to online evidence-based information: a randomised controlled trial

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study examined the effectiveness of seven different interventions designed to increase the proportion of general practitioners (GPs) accepting an offer of free access to an online evidence-based resource.

Methods

Australian GPs (n = 14,000) were randomly selected and assigned to seven intervention groups, with each receiving a different letter. Seven different strategies were used to encourage GPs to accept an offer of two years free access to an online evidence-based resource (BMJ Clinical Evidence). The first group received a standard letter of offer with no experimental demands. Groups two to seven received a standard letter of offer outlining the requirements of the study. They were asked to complete an initial online questionnaire, agree to complete a 12-month follow-up questionnaire, and agree to having data about their usage of the online evidence-based resource provided to researchers. Groups three to seven also had additional interventions included in the letter of offer: access to an online tutorial in use of the resource (group three); provision of a pamphlet with statements from influential opinion leaders endorsing the resource (group four); offer of eligibility to receive professional development points (group five); offer of eligibility for a prize of $500 for registration at a medical conference of their choice (group six); and a combination of some of the above interventions (group seven).

Results

In the group with no research demands, 27% accepted the offer. Average acceptance across all other groups was 10%. There was no advantage in using additional strategies such as financial incentives, opinion leader support, offer of professional development points, or an educational aid over a standard letter of offer to increase acceptance rates.

Conclusion

This study showed low acceptance rates of the offer of access to the online resource when there was an associated requirement of response to a short online questionnaire and non-obtrusive monitoring of GP behaviour in terms of accessing the resource. If we are to improve care and encourage evidence-based practice, we need to find effective ways of motivating doctors and other health professionals to take part in research that can inform our implementation efforts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Straus S: Teaching evidence-based medicine skills can change practice in a community hospital. The Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005, 20: 340-343. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04045.x.CrossRefPubMed Straus S: Teaching evidence-based medicine skills can change practice in a community hospital. The Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005, 20: 340-343. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04045.x.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Glasziou P: Managing the evidence flood. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2006, 86: 193-199. 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.016.CrossRefPubMed Glasziou P: Managing the evidence flood. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2006, 86: 193-199. 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.016.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Druss B, Marcus S: Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: Implications for evidence-based medicine. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2005, 93 (4): 499-501.PubMedPubMedCentral Druss B, Marcus S: Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: Implications for evidence-based medicine. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2005, 93 (4): 499-501.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
go back to reference Oliveri R, Gluud C, Wille-Jørgensen P: Hospital doctors' self-rated skills in and use of evidence-based medicine: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2004, 10: 219-226. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00477.x.CrossRefPubMed Oliveri R, Gluud C, Wille-Jørgensen P: Hospital doctors' self-rated skills in and use of evidence-based medicine: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2004, 10: 219-226. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00477.x.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tonelli M: The limits of evidence-based medicine. Respiratory Care. 2001, 46 (12): 1435-1440.PubMed Tonelli M: The limits of evidence-based medicine. Respiratory Care. 2001, 46 (12): 1435-1440.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Henderson J, Britt H, Miller G: Extent and utilisation of computerisation in Australian general practice. Medical Journal of Australia. 2006, 185 (2): 84-87.PubMed Henderson J, Britt H, Miller G: Extent and utilisation of computerisation in Australian general practice. Medical Journal of Australia. 2006, 185 (2): 84-87.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Keddie Z, Jones R: Information communication technology in general practice: Cross sectional survey in London. Informatics in Primary Care. 2005, 13: 113-123.PubMed Keddie Z, Jones R: Information communication technology in general practice: Cross sectional survey in London. Informatics in Primary Care. 2005, 13: 113-123.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Janes R: Rural New Zealand health professionals' perceived barriers to greater use of the internet for learning. Rural and Remote Health. 2005, 5: 436-PubMed Janes R: Rural New Zealand health professionals' perceived barriers to greater use of the internet for learning. Rural and Remote Health. 2005, 5: 436-PubMed
13.
go back to reference Heywood A: Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: The use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research. Family Practice. 1995, 12: 227-231. 10.1093/fampra/12.2.227.CrossRefPubMed Heywood A: Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: The use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research. Family Practice. 1995, 12: 227-231. 10.1093/fampra/12.2.227.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bhandari M: A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: Effect on primary response rates. International Journal of Epidemiological Association. 2003, 32: 634-636.CrossRef Bhandari M: A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: Effect on primary response rates. International Journal of Epidemiological Association. 2003, 32: 634-636.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Thomson O'Brien M: Local opinion leaders: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1999, CD000125-10.1002/14651858.CD000125. 1 Thomson O'Brien M: Local opinion leaders: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1999, CD000125-10.1002/14651858.CD000125. 1
16.
go back to reference Blumenthal D: Doctors and drug companies. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004, 351 (18): 1885-1890. 10.1056/NEJMhpr042734.CrossRefPubMed Blumenthal D: Doctors and drug companies. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004, 351 (18): 1885-1890. 10.1056/NEJMhpr042734.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Foy R: How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care?. Experience from seven studies. 2003, 20 (1): 83-92. Foy R: How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care?. Experience from seven studies. 2003, 20 (1): 83-92.
19.
go back to reference Edwards P: Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005, 59: 987-999. 10.1136/jech.2005.034397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards P: Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005, 59: 987-999. 10.1136/jech.2005.034397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Wensing M, Weijden van der T, Grol R: Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: Which interventions are effective?. British Journal of General Practice. 1998, 48: 991-997.PubMedPubMedCentral Wensing M, Weijden van der T, Grol R: Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: Which interventions are effective?. British Journal of General Practice. 1998, 48: 991-997.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Chaillet N: Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2006, 108 (5): 1234-1245.CrossRef Chaillet N: Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2006, 108 (5): 1234-1245.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Britt H: General practice activity in Australia 2002-03. AIHW Cat. No. GEP 14. 2003, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (General Practice Series No. 14) Britt H: General practice activity in Australia 2002-03. AIHW Cat. No. GEP 14. 2003, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (General Practice Series No. 14)
23.
24.
go back to reference Gjersvik PJ, Nylenna M, Aasland O: Use of the Internet among dermatologists in the United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway. Dermatology Online Journal. 2002, 8 (2): 1-PubMed Gjersvik PJ, Nylenna M, Aasland O: Use of the Internet among dermatologists in the United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway. Dermatology Online Journal. 2002, 8 (2): 1-PubMed
25.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J: Evidence based implementation of evidence based medicine. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Improvement. 1999, 25 (10): Grol R, Grimshaw J: Evidence based implementation of evidence based medicine. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Improvement. 1999, 25 (10):
26.
go back to reference Wright J: Why Cancer Patients Enter Randomized Clinical Trials: Exploring the Factors That Influence Their Decision. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004, 22 (21): 4312-4318. 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.187.CrossRefPubMed Wright J: Why Cancer Patients Enter Randomized Clinical Trials: Exploring the Factors That Influence Their Decision. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004, 22 (21): 4312-4318. 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.187.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of strategies to encourage general practitioners to accept an offer of free access to online evidence-based information: a randomised controlled trial
Publication date
01-12-2009
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-68

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Implementation Science 1/2009 Go to the issue