Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Methodology

Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings

Authors: Sylvia Dickson, Janet Logan, Suzanne Hagen, Diane Stark, Cathryn Glazener, Alison M McDonald, Gladys McPherson

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Successful recruitment of participants to any trial is central to its success. Trial results are routinely published, and recruitment is often cited to be slower and more difficult than anticipated. This article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting women with prolapse attending United Kingdom (UK) gynaecology outpatient clinics to a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of physiotherapy, and the systems put in place in an attempt to address them.

Methods

Gynaecology outpatients with symptomatic prolapse were to be recruited over a 16-month period from 14 UK hospitals and one New Zealand hospital. Eligible women were informed about the trial by their gynaecologist and informed consent was obtained by the central trial office. Recruitment difficulties were encountered early on, and a number of strategies were employed to try to improve recruitment.

Results

Some strategies were more successful than others and they differed in the resources required. Actions that facilitated recruitment included increasing recruiting centres to 23 UK and two international hospitals, good centre support, using processes embedded in clinical practice, and good communication between the trial office, collaborators and participants. Collaborator incentives, whereby staff involved received the benefit immediately, were more successful than a nominal monetary payment per woman randomised. Barriers to recruitment included fewer eligible women than anticipated, patient’s preference to receive active treatment rather than allocation to the control group, lack of support staff and high staff turnover. Geographical variations in Primary Care Trust Research Management and Governance approval systems and general practitioner (GP) referral procedures also impacted negatively on recruitment.

Conclusions

Our article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a multi-centre RCT in a UK gynaecology setting. Effective interventions included increasing the number of recruiting centres and providing collaborator incentives. Barriers to recruitment included fewer eligible women than anticipated, patient’s preference to be allocated to the treatment group, lack of support staff, and variations in approval systems and GP referral procedures. To improve the evidence base on clinical trial recruitment, trialists need to publish their experiences and lessons learned. Future RCTs should evaluate, where possible, the effect of strategies designed to improve recruitment and retention.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN35911035
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, Entwistle V, Garcia J, Roberts I, Grant A: Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2008, 11: 48- Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, Entwistle V, Garcia J, Roberts I, Grant A: Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2008, 11: 48-
2.
go back to reference Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, Cook JA, Kjeldstrøm M, Johansen M, Taskila T, Sullivan FM, Wilson S, Jackson C, Jones R, Mitchell ED: Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013, 3: e002360-10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, Cook JA, Kjeldstrøm M, Johansen M, Taskila T, Sullivan FM, Wilson S, Jackson C, Jones R, Mitchell ED: Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013, 3: e002360-10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Rendell JM, Merritt RD, Geddes J: Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 2: MR000021-PubMed Rendell JM, Merritt RD, Geddes J: Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 2: MR000021-PubMed
4.
go back to reference Caldwell PHY, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC: Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Systematic review. PloS Medicine. 2010, 7: e1000368-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Caldwell PHY, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC: Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Systematic review. PloS Medicine. 2010, 7: e1000368-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S: Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012, 2: e000496-10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S: Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012, 2: e000496-10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Frawley H, Moore KH, Walker A, McPherson G, Logan J, Wilson D, Norrie J, Dickson S, Sinclair L, Glazener C, Stark D, Hagen S: A multicentre randomised controlled trial of a pelvic floor muscle training intervention for women with pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011, 30: 983-984. Abstract Frawley H, Moore KH, Walker A, McPherson G, Logan J, Wilson D, Norrie J, Dickson S, Sinclair L, Glazener C, Stark D, Hagen S: A multicentre randomised controlled trial of a pelvic floor muscle training intervention for women with pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011, 30: 983-984. Abstract
7.
go back to reference Hagen S, Stark D, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Ramsay I: A randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training for stages I and II pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2009, 20: 45-51.CrossRef Hagen S, Stark D, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Ramsay I: A randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training for stages I and II pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2009, 20: 45-51.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskow P, Shull BL, Smith ARB: The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 175: 10-17. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0.CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskow P, Shull BL, Smith ARB: The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 175: 10-17. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harris EL, Fitzgerald JD: The Principles and Practices of Clinical Trials. 1970, Edinburgh: E&S Livingstone Harris EL, Fitzgerald JD: The Principles and Practices of Clinical Trials. 1970, Edinburgh: E&S Livingstone
12.
go back to reference Hagen S, Stark D, Cattermole D: A United Kingdom-wide survey of physiotherapy practice in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Physiotherapy. 2004, 90: 19-26. 10.1016/S0031-9406(03)00003-8.CrossRef Hagen S, Stark D, Cattermole D: A United Kingdom-wide survey of physiotherapy practice in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Physiotherapy. 2004, 90: 19-26. 10.1016/S0031-9406(03)00003-8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mills N, Donovan JL, Wade J, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Lane JA: Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011, 64: 1127-1136. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mills N, Donovan JL, Wade J, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Lane JA: Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011, 64: 1127-1136. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Bryant J, Powell J: Payment of healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review. BMJ. 2005, 331: 1377-1378. 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bryant J, Powell J: Payment of healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review. BMJ. 2005, 331: 1377-1378. 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, Frankel S, Neal D, Hamdy F for the Protect Study Group: Improving design and conduct of randomised controlled trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ. 2002, 325: 737-740. 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.737.CrossRef Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, Frankel S, Neal D, Hamdy F for the Protect Study Group: Improving design and conduct of randomised controlled trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ. 2002, 325: 737-740. 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.737.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings
Authors
Sylvia Dickson
Janet Logan
Suzanne Hagen
Diane Stark
Cathryn Glazener
Alison M McDonald
Gladys McPherson
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-389

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Trials 1/2013 Go to the issue