Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Globalization and Health
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Descriptive review and evaluation of the functioning of the International Health Regulations (IHR) Annex 2

Authors: Aranka Anema, Eric Druyts, Helge G Hollmeyer, Maxwell C Hardiman, Kumanan Wilson

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The International Health Regulations (IHRs) (2005) was developed with the aim of governing international responses to public health risks and emergencies. The document requires all 194 World Health Organization (WHO) Member States to detect, assess, notify and report any potential public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) under specific timelines. Annex 2 of the IHR outlines decision-making criteria for State-appointed National Focal Points (NFP) to report potential PHEICs to the WHO, and is a critical component to the effective functioning of the IHRs.

Methods

The aim of the study was to review and evaluate the functioning of Annex 2 across WHO-reporting States Parties. Specific objectives were to ascertain NFP awareness and knowledge of Annex 2, practical use of the tool, activities taken to implement it, its perceived usefulness and user-friendliness. Qualitative telephone interviews, followed by a quantitative online survey, were administered to NFPs between October, 2009 and February, 2010.

Results

A total of 29 and 133 NFPs participated in the qualitative and quantitative studies, respectively. Qualitative interviews found most NFPs had a strong working knowledge of Annex 2; perceived the tool to be relevant and useful for guiding decisions; and had institutionalized management, legislation and communication systems to support it. NFPs also perceived Annex 2 as human and disease-centric, and emphasized its reduced applicability to potential PHEICs involving bioterrorist attacks, infectious diseases among animals, radio-nuclear and chemical spills, and water- or food-borne contamination. Among quantitative survey respondents, 88% reported having excellent/good knowledge of Annex 2; 77% reported always/usually using Annex 2 for assessing potential PHEICs; 76% indicated their country had some legal, regulatory or administrative provisions for using Annex 2; 95% indicated Annex 2 was always/usually useful for facilitating decisions regarding notifiability of potential PHEICs.

Conclusion

This evaluation, including a large sample of WHO-reporting States Parties, found that the IHR's Annex 2 is perceived as useful for guiding decisions about notifiability of potential PHEICs. There is scope for the WHO to expand training and guidance on application of the IHR's Annex 2 to specific contexts. Continued monitoring and evaluation of the functioning of the IHR is imperative to promoting global health security.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Gostin LO: International infectious disease law: Revision of the World Health Organization's International Health Regulations. JAMA. 2004, 291 (21): 2623-2627. 10.1001/jama.291.21.2623.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Fidler DP: From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New International Health Regulations. Chinese Journal of International Law. 2005, 1-68.
5.
6.
7.
Wilson K, Brownstein JS, Fidler DP: Strengthening the International Health Regulations: lessons from the H1N1 pandemic. Health Policy Plan. 2010, 25 (6): 505-509. 10.1093/heapol/czq026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Katz R: Use of revised International Health Regulations during influenza A (H1N1) epidemic, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15 (8): 1165-1170. 10.3201/eid1508.090665.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
10.
Seale C, Silverman S: Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur J Public Health. 1995, 5: 72-74.
11.
Giacomini MK, Cook DJ: Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Jama. 2000, 284 (3): 357-362. 10.1001/jama.284.3.357.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Rodier G, Hardiman M, Plotkin B, Ganter B: Implementing the International Health Regulations (2005) in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2006, 11 (12): 208-211.PubMed
14.
Paquet C, Coulombier D, Kaiser R, Ciotti M: Epidemic intelligence: a new framework for strengthening disease surveillance in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2006, 11 (12): 212-214.PubMed
15.
16.
Armstrong KE, McNabb SJ, Ferland LD, Stephens T, Muldoon A, Fernandez JA, Ostroff S: Capacity of public health surveillance to comply with revised international health regulations, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010, 16 (5): 804-808.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Kant L, Krishnan SK: Information and communication technology in disease surveillance, India: a case study. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (Suppl 1): S11-10.1186/1471-2458-10-S1-S11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Wamala JF, Okot C, Makumbi I, Natseri N, Kisakye A, Nanyunja M, Bakamutumaho B, Lutwama JJ, Sreedharan R, Xing J, Gaturuku P, Aisu T, Da Silveira F, Chungong S: Assessment of core capacities for the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005])--Uganda, 2009. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (Suppl 1): S9-10.1186/1471-2458-10-S1-S9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Chrétien JP, Yingst SL, Thompson D: Building public health capacity in Afghanistan to implement the International Health Regulations: a role for security forces. Biosecur Bioterror. 2010, 8 (3): 277-285. 10.1089/bsp.2009.0058.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Taboy CH, Chapman W, Albetkova A, Kennedy S, Rayfield MA: Integrated Disease Investigations and Surveillance planning: a systems approach to strengthening national surveillance and detection of events of public health importance in support of the International Health Regulations. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (Suppl 1): S6-10.1186/1471-2458-10-S1-S6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Wilson K, McDougall C, Upshur R, Joint Centre for Bioethics SARS Global Health Ethics Research Group: The new International Health Regulations and the federalism dilemma. Plos Med. 2006, 3 (1): e1-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Katz R, Kornblet S: Comparative analysis of national legislation in support of the revised international health regulations: potential models for implementation in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2010, 100 (12): 2347-2353. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180414.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Wilson K, McDougall C, Fidler DP, Lazar H: Strategies for implementing the new International Health Regulations in federal countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86 (3): 215-220. 10.2471/BLT.07.042838.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Specter S, Schuermann L, Hakiruwizera C, Sow MS: ASM LabCap's contributions to disease surveillance and the International Health Regulations (2005). BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (Suppl 1): S7-10.1186/1471-2458-10-S1-S7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Katz RL, Fernandez JA, McNabb SJ: Disease surveillance, capacity building and implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]). BMC Public Health. 2010, 10 (Suppl 1): S1-10.1186/1471-2458-10-S1-S1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Olowokure B, Pooransingh S, Tempowski J, Palmer S, Meredith T: Global surveillance for chemical incidents of international public health concern. Bull World Health Organ. 2005, 83 (12): 928-934.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
World Health Organization (WHO): Report of the World Health Organization (WHO) databases study for the review and evaluation of the functioning of Annex 2, International Health Regulations (2005). 2010
28.
29.
Chan EH, Brewer TF, Madoff LC, Pollack MP, Sonricker AL, Keller M, Freifeld CC, Blench M, Mawudeku A, Brownstein JS: Global capacity for emerging infectious disease detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010.
30.
May L, Chretien JP, Pavlin JA: Beyond traditional surveillance: applying syndromic surveillance to developing settings--opportunities and challenges. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 242-10.1186/1471-2458-9-242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Metadata
Title
Descriptive review and evaluation of the functioning of the International Health Regulations (IHR) Annex 2
Authors
Aranka Anema
Eric Druyts
Helge G Hollmeyer
Maxwell C Hardiman
Kumanan Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-8-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Globalization and Health 1/2012 Go to the issue

Review

A profile and approach to chronic disease in Abu Dhabi

Commentary

Contextualizing chronicity: a perspective from Malaysia

Review

Non-communicable diseases in Mozambique: risk factors, burden, response and outcomes to date

Research

Facilitators and barriers to accessing reproductive health care for migrant beer promoters in Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam: A mixed methods study

Research

The politics behind the implementation of the WTO Paragraph 6 Decision in Canada to increase global drug access

Debate

The evolution of global health teaching in undergraduate medical curricula