Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Review

Setting and meeting priorities in Indigenous health research in Australia and its application in the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health

Authors: Johanna M Monk, Kevin G Rowley, Ian PS Anderson

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Priority setting is about making decisions. Key issues faced during priority setting processes include identifying who makes these decisions, who sets the criteria, and who benefits. The paper reviews the literature and history around priority setting in research, particularly in Aboriginal health research. We explore these issues through a case study of the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health (CRCAH)'s experience in setting and meeting priorities.
Historically, researchers have made decisions about what research gets done. Pressures of growing competition for research funds and an increased public interest in research have led to demands that appropriate consultation with stakeholders is conducted and that research is of benefit to the wider society. Within Australian Aboriginal communities, these demands extend to Aboriginal control of research to ensure that Aboriginal priorities are met.
In response to these demands, research priorities are usually agreed in consultation with stakeholders at an institutional level and researchers are asked to develop relevant proposals at a project level. The CRCAH's experience in funding rounds was that scientific merit was given more weight than stakeholders' priorities and did not necessarily result in research that met these priorities. After reviewing these processes in 2004, the CRCAH identified a new facilitated development approach. In this revised approach, the setting of institutional priorities is integrated with the development of projects in a way that ensures the research reflects stakeholder priorities.
This process puts emphasis on identifying projects that reflect priorities prior to developing the quality of the research, rather than assessing the relevance to priorities and quality concurrently. Part of the CRCAH approach is the employment of Program Managers who ensure that stakeholder priorities are met in the development of research projects. This has enabled researchers and stakeholders to come together to collaboratively develop priority-driven research. Involvement by both groups in project development has been found to be essential in making decisions that will lead to robust and useful research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aitken D: The vexed question of research priorities: an Australian example. Prometheus. 1997, 15: 181-195. 10.1080/08109029708632070.CrossRef Aitken D: The vexed question of research priorities: an Australian example. Prometheus. 1997, 15: 181-195. 10.1080/08109029708632070.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Street J, Baum F, Anderson I: Making research relevant: grant assessment processes in Indigenous research. CRCAH Discussion Paper No 3. 2008, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Street J, Baum F, Anderson I: Making research relevant: grant assessment processes in Indigenous research. CRCAH Discussion Paper No 3. 2008, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
3.
go back to reference Scott A: Peer Review and the Relevance of Science. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, paper no 145. 2006, Brighton: University of Sussex Scott A: Peer Review and the Relevance of Science. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, paper no 145. 2006, Brighton: University of Sussex
4.
go back to reference National Health & Medical Research Council: The Virtuous Cycle - Working together for health and medical research - Health and Medical Research Strategic Review - Discussion Document December 1998. 1998, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia National Health & Medical Research Council: The Virtuous Cycle - Working together for health and medical research - Health and Medical Research Strategic Review - Discussion Document December 1998. 1998, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
5.
go back to reference Harman K: Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Australian Biomedical Research: Muddling with Some Skill. Prometheus. 2000, 18: 373-390. 10.1080/08109020020008497.CrossRef Harman K: Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Australian Biomedical Research: Muddling with Some Skill. Prometheus. 2000, 18: 373-390. 10.1080/08109020020008497.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Field P, Wakerman J: A case study in strategic change: developing a strategic research program to address cardiovascular disease and related disorders in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and rural and remote settings. Australian Health Review. 2002, 25: 127-131.CrossRefPubMed Field P, Wakerman J: A case study in strategic change: developing a strategic research program to address cardiovascular disease and related disorders in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and rural and remote settings. Australian Health Review. 2002, 25: 127-131.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference MacLean M, Anderson J, Martin BR: Identifying Research Priorities in Public Sector Funding Agencies: Mapping Science Outputs on to User Needs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1998, 10: 139-155. 10.1080/09537329808524308.CrossRef MacLean M, Anderson J, Martin BR: Identifying Research Priorities in Public Sector Funding Agencies: Mapping Science Outputs on to User Needs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1998, 10: 139-155. 10.1080/09537329808524308.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brown G: The freedom and the responsibility of the investigator-initiated research. Academic Medicine. 1994, 69: 437-440.CrossRefPubMed Brown G: The freedom and the responsibility of the investigator-initiated research. Academic Medicine. 1994, 69: 437-440.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2003, 13;1 (1): 2-10.1186/1478-4505-1-2.CrossRef Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2003, 13;1 (1): 2-10.1186/1478-4505-1-2.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P: On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Quarterly. 2003, 81: 363-388. 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P: On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Quarterly. 2003, 81: 363-388. 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Callahan D: Shaping Biomedical Research Priorities: The Case of the National Institutes of Health. Health Care Analysis. 1999, 7: 115-129. 10.1023/A:1009401507982.CrossRefPubMed Callahan D: Shaping Biomedical Research Priorities: The Case of the National Institutes of Health. Health Care Analysis. 1999, 7: 115-129. 10.1023/A:1009401507982.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference de Fransisco A: Priority Setting in Health Research. 10/90 Report on Health Research 2003-2004. 2004, Global Forum for Health Research ed. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research de Fransisco A: Priority Setting in Health Research. 10/90 Report on Health Research 2003-2004. 2004, Global Forum for Health Research ed. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research
14.
go back to reference Shergold M, Grant J: Freedom and need: the evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008, 6: 2-10.1186/1478-4505-6-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shergold M, Grant J: Freedom and need: the evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008, 6: 2-10.1186/1478-4505-6-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Redman S, Carrick S, Cockburn J, Hirst S: Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: how good is the nominal group technique. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 1997, 21: 250-256. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01695.x.CrossRefPubMed Redman S, Carrick S, Cockburn J, Hirst S: Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: how good is the nominal group technique. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 1997, 21: 250-256. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01695.x.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Resnik D: Setting Biomedical Research Priorities: Justice, Science, and Public Participation. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2001, 11: 181-204. 10.1353/ken.2001.0017.CrossRefPubMed Resnik D: Setting Biomedical Research Priorities: Justice, Science, and Public Participation. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2001, 11: 181-204. 10.1353/ken.2001.0017.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mills BF, Karanja DD: Processes and methods for research programme priority setting: the experience of the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Wheat Programme KARl Wheat Programme, Njoro, Kenya. Food Policy. 1997, 22: 63-79. 10.1016/S0306-9192(96)00031-0.CrossRef Mills BF, Karanja DD: Processes and methods for research programme priority setting: the experience of the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Wheat Programme KARl Wheat Programme, Njoro, Kenya. Food Policy. 1997, 22: 63-79. 10.1016/S0306-9192(96)00031-0.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Currat LJ: Complementary approaches for priority setting in health research: review and perspectives. 10/90 Report on Health Research 2000. 2000, (Global Forum for Health Research ed. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research Currat LJ: Complementary approaches for priority setting in health research: review and perspectives. 10/90 Report on Health Research 2000. 2000, (Global Forum for Health Research ed. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research
19.
go back to reference Kalucy L, Beacham B, Raupach J, Dwyer J, Pilotto L: Priority Setting in Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development in Australia: Final Report: Priority Setting Process, Stage 1. 2001, Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research and Information Service Kalucy L, Beacham B, Raupach J, Dwyer J, Pilotto L: Priority Setting in Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development in Australia: Final Report: Priority Setting Process, Stage 1. 2001, Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research and Information Service
20.
go back to reference Humphery K: Dirty questions: Indigenous health and 'Western research'. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2001, 25: 197-202. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00563.x.CrossRef Humphery K: Dirty questions: Indigenous health and 'Western research'. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2001, 25: 197-202. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00563.x.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference National Aboriginal Health Strategy Working Party: The National Aboriginal Health Strategy. 1989, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health & Ageing National Aboriginal Health Strategy Working Party: The National Aboriginal Health Strategy. 1989, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health & Ageing
22.
go back to reference Tsey K: Making Research More Relevant to the Needs and Aspirations of Indigenous Australians: the Importance of Research Capacity Development. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal. 2001, 25: 19-24. Tsey K: Making Research More Relevant to the Needs and Aspirations of Indigenous Australians: the Importance of Research Capacity Development. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal. 2001, 25: 19-24.
23.
go back to reference Tuhiwai Smith L: Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 1999, London and Dunedin: Zed Books and University of Otago Press Tuhiwai Smith L: Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 1999, London and Dunedin: Zed Books and University of Otago Press
24.
go back to reference O'Neil J, Reading J, Bartlett J, Young K, Kaufert J: Integrating a Focus on Aboriginal Health Research in the Development of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research: a Concept Paper. Social Science and Humanities Research Council and the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. 1999 O'Neil J, Reading J, Bartlett J, Young K, Kaufert J: Integrating a Focus on Aboriginal Health Research in the Development of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research: a Concept Paper. Social Science and Humanities Research Council and the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. 1999
25.
go back to reference Henry J, Dunbar Te, Arnott A, Scrimgeour M, Matthews S, Murakami-Gold L, Chamberlain A: Indigenous Research Reform Agenda 3: Changing Institutions. 2002, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health Henry J, Dunbar Te, Arnott A, Scrimgeour M, Matthews S, Murakami-Gold L, Chamberlain A: Indigenous Research Reform Agenda 3: Changing Institutions. 2002, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health
26.
go back to reference Schnarch B: Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: a critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health. 2004, 1: 80-95. Schnarch B: Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: a critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health. 2004, 1: 80-95.
27.
go back to reference VicHealth Koori Health Research and Community Development Unit: We don't like research ... but in Koori Hands it could make a difference. 2000, Melbourne: VicHealth Koori Health Research and Community Development Unit VicHealth Koori Health Research and Community Development Unit: We don't like research ... but in Koori Hands it could make a difference. 2000, Melbourne: VicHealth Koori Health Research and Community Development Unit
29.
go back to reference National Health & Medical Research Council: Final Report of Community Consultations on the NHMRC Road Map: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Agenda Working Group (RAWG) of the NHMRC, October 2002. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia National Health & Medical Research Council: Final Report of Community Consultations on the NHMRC Road Map: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Agenda Working Group (RAWG) of the NHMRC, October 2002. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
30.
go back to reference Dwyer J, Silburn K: Review of the NHMRC Road Map: A Strategic Framework for Improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Through Research: Final Consultation Report, September 2008. 2009, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia Dwyer J, Silburn K: Review of the NHMRC Road Map: A Strategic Framework for Improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Through Research: Final Consultation Report, September 2008. 2009, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
31.
go back to reference Henry J: Cooperative Research Centres for Aboriginal Health1997-A Case Study in Public Good Research, A report prepared for the Science and Innovation Mapping Study Department of Education, Science and Training. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training Henry J: Cooperative Research Centres for Aboriginal Health1997-A Case Study in Public Good Research, A report prepared for the Science and Innovation Mapping Study Department of Education, Science and Training. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training
32.
go back to reference Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: Annual Report 2004-2005. 2005, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: Annual Report 2004-2005. 2005, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
33.
go back to reference Street J, Baum F, Anderson I: Developing a collaborative research system for Aboriginal health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2007, 31: 372-378. 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00090.x.CrossRefPubMed Street J, Baum F, Anderson I: Developing a collaborative research system for Aboriginal health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2007, 31: 372-378. 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00090.x.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: An integrated programmatic approach to the CRCAH's research and development activities, October 2004. 2004, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: An integrated programmatic approach to the CRCAH's research and development activities, October 2004. 2004, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
35.
go back to reference Brands J, Gooda M: Putting the users of research in the driver seat: the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health's new approach to research development. Australian Aboriginal Studies: Journal of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. 2006, 27-35. Brands J, Gooda M: Putting the users of research in the driver seat: the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health's new approach to research development. Australian Aboriginal Studies: Journal of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. 2006, 27-35.
36.
go back to reference Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: Annual Report 2005-2006. 2006, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: Annual Report 2005-2006. 2006, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
37.
go back to reference Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: CRCAH Research Development and Approvals Processes (August 2005). 2005, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health: CRCAH Research Development and Approvals Processes (August 2005). 2005, Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
39.
go back to reference Brands J: Turning the Oil Tanker: Shifting to User Driven Research. Presentation at GP & PHC Research Conference: Getting research right for policy and practice, 27 July Adelaide. 2005, Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Brands J: Turning the Oil Tanker: Shifting to User Driven Research. Presentation at GP & PHC Research Conference: Getting research right for policy and practice, 27 July Adelaide. 2005, Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
40.
go back to reference Gooda M: Collaboration and impact in Indigenous Research. Presentation to the Australasian Research Management Society Annual Conference: Collaboration with Impact, 19-21 September Adelaide. 2007, Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health Gooda M: Collaboration and impact in Indigenous Research. Presentation to the Australasian Research Management Society Annual Conference: Collaboration with Impact, 19-21 September Adelaide. 2007, Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
Metadata
Title
Setting and meeting priorities in Indigenous health research in Australia and its application in the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health
Authors
Johanna M Monk
Kevin G Rowley
Ian PS Anderson
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-25

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2009 Go to the issue