Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale

Authors: Simon Dixon, Chris D Poole, Isaac Odeyemi, Peny Retsa, Colette Chambers, Craig J Currie

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ-5D - has come under criticism due to the inherent limitations of its three-level response scales. In evaluations of chronic pain, the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) which has eleven levels is routinely used which has a greater measurement range, but which can not be used in cost-effetiveness analyses. This study derived utility values for a series of EQ-5D health states that replace the pain dimensions with the NPRS, thereby allowing a potentially greater range of pain intensities to be captured and included in economic analyses.

Methods

Interviews were undertaken with 100 member of the general population. Health state valuations were elicited using the time trade-off approach with a ten year time horizon. Additionally, respondents were asked where the EQ-5D response scale descriptors of moderate and extreme pain lay on the 11-point NPRS scale.

Results

625 valuations were undertaken across the study sample with the crude mean health state utilities showing a negative non-linear relationship with respect to increasing pain intensity. Relative to a NPRS of zero (NPRS0), the successive pain levels (NPRS1-10) had mean decrements in utility of 0.034, 0.043, 0.061, 0.121, 0.144, 0.252, 0.404, 0.575, 0.771 and 0.793, respectively. When respondents were asked to mark on the NPRS scale the EQ-5D pain descriptors of moderate and extreme pain, the median responses were '4' and '8', respectively.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate the potential floor effect of the EQ-5D with respect to pain and provide estimates of health reduction associated with pain intensity described by the NPRS. These estimates are in excess of the decrements produced by an application of the EQ-5D scoring tariff for both the United States and the United Kingdom.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2008. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2008.
2.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
3.
go back to reference Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper C, Booth A: A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 1999,3(9):1–164. Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper C, Booth A: A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 1999,3(9):1–164.
4.
go back to reference Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001, 33: 337–43. 10.3109/07853890109002087PubMedCrossRef Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001, 33: 337–43. 10.3109/07853890109002087PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002, 21: 271–292. 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8PubMedCrossRef Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002, 21: 271–292. 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW: Multiattribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995, 7: 490–502. 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004PubMedCrossRef Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW: Multiattribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995, 7: 490–502. 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J: A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004, 13: 873–84. 10.1002/hec.866PubMedCrossRef Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J: A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004, 13: 873–84. 10.1002/hec.866PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Doth AH, Hansson PT, Jensen MP, Taylor RS: The burden of neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of health utilities. Pain 2010, 149: 338–44. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.034PubMedCrossRef Doth AH, Hansson PT, Jensen MP, Taylor RS: The burden of neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of health utilities. Pain 2010, 149: 338–44. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.034PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McDonough CM, Grove MR, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Hilibrand AS, Tosteson ANA: Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 1321–1332. 10.1007/s11136-004-5743-2PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McDonough CM, Grove MR, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Hilibrand AS, Tosteson ANA: Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 1321–1332. 10.1007/s11136-004-5743-2PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Suarez-Almazor ME, Kendall C, Johnson JA, Skeith K, Vincent D: Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatology 2000, 39: 783–790. 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.783PubMedCrossRef Suarez-Almazor ME, Kendall C, Johnson JA, Skeith K, Vincent D: Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatology 2000, 39: 783–790. 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.783PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ware J, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Med Care 1992, 30: 473–483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002PubMedCrossRef Ware J, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Med Care 1992, 30: 473–483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Williamson A, Hoggart B: Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005, 14: 798–804. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.xPubMedCrossRef Williamson A, Hoggart B: Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005, 14: 798–804. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.xPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Torrance GW: Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986, 5: 1–30. 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2PubMedCrossRef Torrance GW: Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986, 5: 1–30. 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dworking RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LDq, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J: Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005, 113: 9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012CrossRef Dworking RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LDq, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J: Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005, 113: 9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997, 35: 1095–1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002PubMedCrossRef Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997, 35: 1095–1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005, 43: 203–220. 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003PubMedCrossRef Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005, 43: 203–220. 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference McDermott AM, Toelle TR, Rowbotham DJ, Schaefer CP, Dukes EM: The burden of neuropathic pain: results from a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Pain 2006, 10: 127–135. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.014PubMedCrossRef McDermott AM, Toelle TR, Rowbotham DJ, Schaefer CP, Dukes EM: The burden of neuropathic pain: results from a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Pain 2006, 10: 127–135. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.014PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Eldabe S, Lloyd A, Verdian L, Meduro M, Maclaine G, Dewilde S: Eliciting health state utilities from the general public for severe chronic pain. Eur J Health Econ 2010, 11: 323–330. 10.1007/s10198-009-0178-xPubMedCrossRef Eldabe S, Lloyd A, Verdian L, Meduro M, Maclaine G, Dewilde S: Eliciting health state utilities from the general public for severe chronic pain. Eur J Health Econ 2010, 11: 323–330. 10.1007/s10198-009-0178-xPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale
Authors
Simon Dixon
Chris D Poole
Isaac Odeyemi
Peny Retsa
Colette Chambers
Craig J Currie
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-96

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2011 Go to the issue