Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Review

A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients

Authors: Natalie A de Morton, David J Berlowitz, Jennifer L Keating

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Independent mobility is a key factor in determining readiness for discharge for older patients following acute hospitalisation and has also been identified as a predictor of many important outcomes for this patient group. This review aimed to identify a physical performance instrument that is not disease specific that has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor the mobility of older medical patients in the acute hospital setting.

Methods

Databases initially searched were Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restriction or limits on year of publication until July 2005. After analysis of this yield, a second step was the systematic search of Medline, Cinahl and Embase until August 2005 for evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument. Reports were included in this review if instruments described had face validity for measuring from bed bound to independent levels of ambulation, the items were suitable for application in an acute hospital setting and the instrument required observation (rather than self-report) of physical performance. Evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument was considered if data on measurement properties were reported.

Results

Three instruments, the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) and the Physical Performance Mobility Examination (PPME) were identified as potentially relevant. Clinimetric evaluation indicated that the HABAM has the most desirable properties of these three instruments. However, the HABAM has the limitation of a ceiling effect in an older acute medical patient population and reliability and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) estimates have not been reported for the Rasch refined HABAM. These limitations support the proposal that a new mobility instrument is required for older acute medical patients.

Conclusion

No existing instrument has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor mobility of older acute medical patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Counsell SR, Stewart AL, Kresevic D, Burant CJ, Landefeld CS: Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2003, 51: 451–458. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51152.xCrossRefPubMed
2.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The Timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for the frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991, 39: 142–148.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Holden MK, Gill K, Magliozzi MR: Gait assessment for the neurologically impaired patients. Physical Therapy 1986, 66: 1530–1539.PubMed
4.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965, 14: 61–65.PubMed
5.
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V: The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies 1988, 10: 61–63.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B: Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1989, 42: 703–709. 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6CrossRefPubMed
7.
de Morton N, Jones C, Keating J, Berlowitz D, MacGregor L, Lim W, Jackson B, Brand C: The effect of exercise on outcomes for hospitalised older acute medical patients: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2007, 36: 219–222. 10.1093/ageing/afl118CrossRefPubMed
8.
de Morton N, Keating J, Davidson M: Rasch analysis of the Barthel Index in the assessment of hospitalised older patients following admission for an acute medical condition. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007, 89: 641–647. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.021CrossRef
9.
de Morton NA, Keating JL, Jeffs K: Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2007., (1):
10.
de Morton NA, Keating JL, Jeffs K: The effect of exercise on outcomes for older acute medical inpatients compared to control or alternative treatments: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation 2007, 21: 3–16. 10.1177/0269215506071313CrossRefPubMed
11.
de Morton NA, Keating JL, Berlowitz DJ, Jackson B, Lim WK: Additional exercise does not change hospital or patient outcomes in older medical patients: a controlled clinical trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2007, 53: 105–111.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Rikli RE, Jones CJ: Assessing Physical Performance in independent older adults: Issues and guidelines. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 1997, 5: 244–261.
13.
Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR: Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clincial trials. Health Technology Assessment 1998., 2:
14.
World Health Organisation: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2001.
15.
APTA: Interactive Guide to Physical Therapist Practice with Catalog of Tests and Measures (version 1.0) (Compact disc). Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2001.
16.
17.
Hill K, Denisenko S, Miller K, Clements T, Batchelor F: Clinical outcome measurement in adult neurological physiotherapy. 3rd edition. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2005.
18.
Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1: 307–310.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimally clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 1989, 10: 407–415. 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6CrossRefPubMed
20.
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW: Interpretation of changes on health related quality of life. The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care 2003, 41: 582–592. 10.1097/00005650-200305000-00004PubMed
21.
Low Choy N, Kuys S, Richards M, Isles R: Measurement of the functional ability following traumatic brain injury using the Clinical Outcomes Variable Scale: a reliability study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002, 48: 35–39.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Smith R: Validation and reliability of the Elderly Mobility Scale. Physiotherapy 1994, 80: 744–747.CrossRef
23.
Aberg A, Lindmark B, Lithell H: Development and reliability of the General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF)- a performance-based measure of function-related dependence, pain and insecurity. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003, 25: 462–472. 10.1080/0963828031000069762CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kiresuk TJ, Smith A, Cardillo JE: Goal Attainment Scaling: Applications, Theory and Measurement. Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
25.
King GA, McDougall J, Palisano R, Grtizan J, Tucker MA: Goal attainment scaling: its use in evalutaing pediatric therapy programs. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1999, 19: 31–52. 10.1300/J006v19n02_03
26.
MacKnight C, Rockwood K: A Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility. Age and Ageing 1995, 24: 126–130. 10.1093/ageing/24.2.126CrossRefPubMed
27.
MacKnight C, Rockwood K: Rasch analysis of the hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility (HABAM). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000, 53: 1242–1247. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00255-9CrossRefPubMed
28.
Gerety MB, Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Hazuda HP, Lichtenstein MJ, Bohannon R, Kanten DN, O'Neil MB, Gorton A: Development and validation of the physical performance instrument for the functionally impaired elderly: The Physical Disability index. Journal of Gerontology 1993, 48: M33-M38.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Winograd CH, Lemsky CM, Nevitt MC, Nordstrom TM, Stewart AL, Miller CJ, Bloch DA: Development of a physical performance and mobility examination. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1994, 42: 743–749.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Chiu AYY, Au-Yeung SSY, Lo SK: A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003, 25: 45–50. 10.1080/713813432CrossRefPubMed
31.
Cuijpers CJ, Nelissen LH, Lenssen AF: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Dutch version of the Elderly Mobility Scale in the frail elderly. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Fysiotherapie 2004, 114: 110–113.
32.
Prosser L, Canby A: Further validation of the Elderly Mobility Scale for measurement of mobility of hospitalized elderly people. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997, 11: 338–343.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Spilg EG, Martin BJ, Mitchell SL: Falls risk following discharge from a geriatric day hospital. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003, 17: 334–340. 10.1191/0269215503cr615oaCrossRefPubMed
34.
Lai J, Woo J, Hui E, Chan WM: Telerehabilitation- a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2004, 10: 199–205. 10.1258/1357633041424340CrossRefPubMed
35.
Spilg EG, Martin BJ, Mitchell SL, Aitchison TC: A comparison of mobility assessments in a geriatric day hospital. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001, 15: 296–300. 10.1191/026921501675281708CrossRefPubMed
36.
Andrich D, Marais I: EDU435/635 Instrument design with Rasch IRT and data analysis 1. Unit Materials Semester 2, 2005. Perth, Western Australia: School of Education, Murdoch University; 2005.
37.
Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
38.
Gordon JE, Powell C, Rockwood K: Goal attainment scaling as a measure of clinically important change in nursing-home patients. Age and Ageing 1999, 28: 275–281. 10.1093/ageing/28.3.275CrossRefPubMed
39.
Sherrington C, Lord S: Reliability of simple portable tests of physical performance in older people after hip fracture. Clinical Rehabilitation 2005, 19: 496–504. 10.1191/0269215505cr833oaCrossRefPubMed
40.
Winograd CH, Lindenberger EC, Chavez CM, Mauricio MP, Shi H, Bloch DA: Identifying hospitalized older patients at varying risk for physical performance decline: a new approach. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1997, 45: 604–609.CrossRefPubMed
41.
MacKnight C, Sibley A, Rockwood K: The sensibility of bedside tests of balance and mobility. Geriatrics Today: Journal of the Canadian Geriatrics Society 2002, 5: 140–144.
42.
MacKnight C, Rockwood K: Mobility and balance in the elderly: a guide to bedside assessment. Postgraduate Medicine 1996, 99: 269–271.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients
Authors
Natalie A de Morton
David J Berlowitz
Jennifer L Keating
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-44

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2008 Go to the issue

Research

Do quality of life, participation and environment of older adults differ according to level of activity?

Research

Quality of life among parents of children with heart disease

Research

Child-OIDP index in Brazil: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Research

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11–14 (CPQ11–14) for the Brazilian Portuguese language

Research

Quality of life among adolescents with sickle cell disease: Mediation of pain by internalizing symptoms and parenting stress

Research

Emotional and rational disease acceptance in patients with depression and alcohol addiction