Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research

Ethnic differential item functioning in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients

Authors: Ian S Pagano, Carolyn C Gotay

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Past research has shown that Filipino cancer patients report lower levels of quality of life (QoL) than other ethnic groups. One possible explanation for this is that Filipinos do not define QoL in the same manner as others, resulting in bias in their assessments. Hence, Filipinos would not necessarily have lower QoL.

Methods

Item response theory methods were used to assess differential item functioning (DIF) in the quality of life (measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30) of cancer patients across four ethnic groups (Caucasian, Filipino, Hawaiian, and Japanese). The sample consisted of 359 cancer patients.

Results

Results showed the presence of DIF on several items, indicating ethnic differences in the assessment of quality of life. Relative to the Caucasian and Japanese groups, items related to physical functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning, nausea and vomiting, and financial difficulties exhibited DIF for Filipinos. On these items Filipinos exhibited either higher or lower QoL scores, even though their overall QoL was the same.

Conclusion

This evidence may explain why Filipinos have previously been found to have lower overall QoL. Although Filipinos score lower on QoL than other groups, this may not reflect lower QoL, but rather differences in how QoL is defined. The presence of DIF did not appear, however, to alter the psychometric properties of the QLQ-C30.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Cella DF, Lloyd SR, Wright BD: Cross-cultural instrument equating: Current research and future directions. 1992, 707–715.
2.
Quality of life and clinical trials [editorial] [see comments] Lancet 1995, 346: 1–2.
3.
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al.: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993, 85: 365–376.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Aaronson NK, Bakker W, Stewart AL, van Dam FSAM, van Zandwijk Y, Kirkpatrick A: Multidimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer trials. In The quality of life of cancer patients. Edited by: Aaronson NK and Beckmann JH. New York, Raven Press; 1987:63–82.
5.
Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CLM: Quality of life studies: Definitions and conceptual issues. In Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd edition. Edited by: B.Spilker . Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:11–23.
6.
Irvine DM, Vincent L, Graydon JE, Bubela N: Fatigue in women with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 1998, 21: 127–135. 10.1097/00002820-199804000-00006PubMedCrossRef
7.
Longman AJ, Braden CJ, Mishel MH: Side effects burden in women with breast cancer. Cancer Pract 1996, 4: 274–280.PubMed
8.
Broeckel JA, Jacobsen PB, Balducci L, Horton J, Lyman GH: Quality of life after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000, 62: 141–150. 10.1023/A:1006401914682PubMedCrossRef
9.
Longman AJ, Braden CJ, Mishel MH: Side-effects burden, psychological adjustment, and life quality in women with breast cancer: pattern of association over time. Oncol Nurs Forum 1999, 26: 909–915.PubMed
10.
Ganz PA, Hirji K, Sim MS, Schag CA, Fred C, Polinsky ML: Predicting psychosocial risk in patients with breast cancer. Med Care 1993, 31: 419–431.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Nayfield SG, Hailey BJ: Quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Bethesda, MD, Division of Cancer Preention and Control, National Cancer Institute, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1991.
12.
Moinpour CM, Feigl P, Metch B, Hayden KA, Meyskens FLJ, Crowley J: Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: review and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989, 81: 485–495.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Johnson JR, Temple R: Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treat Rep 1985, 69: 1155–1159.PubMed
14.
Henderson-James D, Spilker B: An industry perspective. In Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. Edited by: Spilker B. New York, Raven Press; 1990:183–192.
15.
Cella DF: Quality of life: the concept. J Palliat Care 1992, 8: 8–13.PubMed
16.
Brisbane FL, Womble M: Working with African Americans: the professional's handbook. Chicago, IL, HRDI International Press; 1992.
17.
Flaherty JA, Gaviria FM, Pathak D, Mitchell T, Wintrob R, Richman JA, Birz S: Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. J Nerv Ment Dis 1988, 176: 257–263.PubMed
18.
Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B: Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med 1978, 88: 251–258.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Marin G, Marin BVO: Research with Hispanic Populations. In Applied Social Research Methods Series. Volume 23. Newberry Park, CA, Sage; 1991.
20.
Marshall PA: Cultural influences on perceived quality of life. Semin Oncol Nurs 1990, 6: 278–284. 10.1016/0749-2081(90)90030-9PubMedCrossRef
21.
Gotay CC, Holup J, Pagano IS: Ethnic differences in quality of life among early breast and prostate cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 2001, 11: 103–113. 10.1002/pon.568CrossRef
22.
Johnson CD, Wicks MN, Milstead J, Hartwig M, Hathaway DK: Racial and gender differences in quality of life following kidney transplantation. Image J Nurs Sch 1998, 30: 125–130.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Bjorner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech P: Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51: 1189–1202. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00111-5PubMedCrossRef
24.
Teresi JA, Kleinman M, Ocepek-Welikson K, Ramirez M, Gurland B, Lantigua R, Holmes D: Applications of item response theory to the examination of the psychometric properties and differential item functioning of the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation dementia diagnostic scale among samples of Latino, African-American, and White non-Latino elderly. Research on Aging 2000, 22: 738–773.CrossRef
25.
Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. Edited by: Macleod CM. New York, Columbia University Press; 1949:191–205.
26.
Batel-Copel LM, Kornblith AB, Batel PC, Holland JC: Do oncologists have an increasing interest in the quality of life of their patients? A literature review of the last 15 years. Eur J Cancer 1997, 33: 29–32. 10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00414-5PubMedCrossRef
27.
Osterlind SJ: Test Item Bias. Beverly Hills, CA, SAGE Publications; 1983.
28.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH: Psychometric Theory. Third edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1994:752.
29.
Holland PW, Wainer H: Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
30.
31.
Hambleton RK: Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Med Care 2000, 38: II60–5.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Embretson SE, Reise SP: Item Response Theory For Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2000.
33.
Cella D, Chang CH: A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care 2000, 38: II66–72.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Baker FB: Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1992.
35.
Linacre JM: Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994, 7: 328.
36.
Gotay CC, Blaine D, Haynes SN, Holup J, Pagano IS: Assessment of quality of life in a multicultural cancer patient population. Psychological Assessment 2002, 14: 439–450. 10.1037/1040-3590.14.4.439PubMedCrossRef
37.
Angoff WH: Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In Differential Item Functioning. Edited by: Holland PW and Wainer H. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993:3–23.
38.
Schaafsma J, Osoba D: The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale re-examined: a cross-validation with the EORTC-C30. Qual Life Res 1994, 3: 413–424. 10.1007/BF00435393PubMedCrossRef
39.
Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd edition. Edited by: Spilker B. New York, Raven Press; 1995.
40.
Gotay CC: Cultural variation in family adjustment to cancer. In Cancer and the family. Edited by: Baider L, Cooper GL and Kaplan De-Nour A. New York, Wiley; 1996:31–52.
Metadata
Title
Ethnic differential item functioning in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients
Authors
Ian S Pagano
Carolyn C Gotay
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-60

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2005 Go to the issue

Research

Adolescent distinctions between quality of life and self-rated health in quality of life research

Research

Health measurement using the ICF: Test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care

Research

The relations between symptoms, somatic and psychiatric conditions, life satisfaction and perceived health. A primary care based study

Research

Development and validation of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument

Research

Cancer history and other personal factors affect quality of life in patients with hepatitis C

Research

Modification of the asthma quality of life questionnaire (standardised) for patients 12 years and older