Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research

Development and validation of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument

Authors: Kwok-fai Leung, Feng-bin Liu, Li Zhao, Ji-qian Fang, Kelvin Chan, Li-zhu Lin

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This paper describes the development of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument (ChQOL) which is a self-report health status instrument. Chinese Medicine relies very much on asking subjective feelings of patients in the process of diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. For thousands of years, Chinese Medicine practitioners have accumulated a good wealth of experiences in asking questions about health of their patients based on the concept of health in Chinese Medicine. These experiences were then transformed into questions for the ChQOL. It is believed that ChQOL can contribute to the existing Patient Report Outcome measures. This paper outlines the concept of health and disease in Traditional Chinese Medicine, the building of the conceptual framework of the ChQOL, the steps of drafting, selecting and validating the items, and the psychometric properties of the ChQOL.

Methods

The development of the ChQOL was based on the concept of health in Traditional Chinese Medicine with a theory driven approach. Based on the results of literature review, the research team developed an initial model of health which encompassed the concept of health in TCM. An expert panel was then invited to comment and give suggestions for improvement of the initial model. According to their suggestions, the model was refined and a set of initial items for the ChQOL was drafted. The refined model, together with the key domains, facets and initial items of the ChQOL were then mailed to a sample of about 100 Chinese medicine practitioners throughout Mainland China for their comments and advice. A revised set of items were developed for linguistic testing by a convenience sample consisting of both healthy people and people who attended Chinese Medicine treatment. After that, an item pool was developed for field-testing. Field test was conducted on a convenience sample of healthy and patient subjects to determine the construct validity and psychometric properties of the ChQOL.

Results

Construct validity was established by various methods, i.e. the internal consistency in all facets and domains were good; the correlation between facets to domain, and domains to overall ChQOL correlation were high; confirmatory factor analysis showed that the structure fitness of all facets, domain and overall structure were good with CFI > 0.9. Test-retest reliability was also good, especially in the domain scores with ICC value ranging from 0.83 to 0.90. No ceiling or floor effect was noted which indicated that ChQOL can be applied to subjects with a wide range of health status. Most facet scores, domain scores and the overall CHQOL scores were able to discriminate groups of subjects with known differences in health status. The ChQOL had mild positive convergence with the other generic health related QOL measures, i.e. the WHOQOL-100 and the SF-36, with moderate correlations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study indicated that the ChQOL is conceptually valid with satisfactory psychometric properties. It can provide additional information on health and QOL on top of the existing generic health related QOL measures. Furthermore, it forms basis for further testing and applications in clinical trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chan K, Lee H: The way forward for Chinese medicine. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Inc; 2002.CrossRef Chan K, Lee H: The way forward for Chinese medicine. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Inc; 2002.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Basic theories of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing, Academy Press; 1998. Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Basic theories of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing, Academy Press; 1998.
3.
go back to reference Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Diagnostics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing, Academy Press; 1998. Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Diagnostics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing, Academy Press; 1998.
4.
go back to reference Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust: Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 2002, 11: 193–205. 10.1023/A:1015291021312CrossRef Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust: Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 2002, 11: 193–205. 10.1023/A:1015291021312CrossRef
5.
go back to reference WHOQOL Study Protocol: Division of Mental Health. World Health Organization, Geneva; WHOQOL Study Protocol: Division of Mental Health. World Health Organization, Geneva;
6.
go back to reference The WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL) : Position Paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995,41(10):1403–1409. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-KCrossRef The WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL) : Position Paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995,41(10):1403–1409. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-KCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fang JQ, ed: Quality of life assessment and application. Beijing: Beijing Medical University Press; 2000. Fang JQ, ed: Quality of life assessment and application. Beijing: Beijing Medical University Press; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Wang SH, Li LM, Li J: The application of the SF-36. Foreign Medical Sciences, Section of Social Medicine 2001,18(1):4–8. (Chinese) Wang SH, Li LM, Li J: The application of the SF-36. Foreign Medical Sciences, Section of Social Medicine 2001,18(1):4–8. (Chinese)
9.
go back to reference Hao YT, Fang JQ, Li CX, Shi ML: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL) Chinese version. Foreign Medical Sciences, Section of Social Medicine 1999,16(3):118–122. (Chinese) Hao YT, Fang JQ, Li CX, Shi ML: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL) Chinese version. Foreign Medical Sciences, Section of Social Medicine 1999,16(3):118–122. (Chinese)
10.
go back to reference Norusis MJ: SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall; 2002. Norusis MJ: SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall; 2002.
11.
go back to reference Byrne B: Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: basic concepts, applications, and programming /Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 1994. Byrne B: Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: basic concepts, applications, and programming /Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 1994.
12.
go back to reference Zhao L, Chan K: The health concept in Chinese medicine. Medicine and Philosophy 2003,24(12):58–59. (Chinese) Zhao L, Chan K: The health concept in Chinese medicine. Medicine and Philosophy 2003,24(12):58–59. (Chinese)
13.
go back to reference Zhao L, Liu FB, Leung KF, Fang JQ, Lin LZ, Chan K: Discussion on the theory and structure model of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation 2004,8(16):3132–3134. (Chinese) Zhao L, Liu FB, Leung KF, Fang JQ, Lin LZ, Chan K: Discussion on the theory and structure model of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation 2004,8(16):3132–3134. (Chinese)
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument
Authors
Kwok-fai Leung
Feng-bin Liu
Li Zhao
Ji-qian Fang
Kelvin Chan
Li-zhu Lin
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-26

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2005 Go to the issue