Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2002

Open Access 01-12-2002 | Research article

Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting

Authors: Carlos M Soto, Kenneth P Kleinman, Steven R Simon

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2002

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Documentation in the medical record facilitates the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Few studies have assessed the quality of outpatient medical record documentation, and to the authors' knowledge, none has conclusively determined the correlates of chart documentation. We therefore undertook the present study to measure the rates of documentation of quality of care measures in an outpatient primary care practice setting that utilizes an electronic medical record.

Methods

We reviewed electronic medical records from 834 patients receiving care from 167 physicians (117 internists and 50 pediatricians) at 14 sites of a multi-specialty medical group in Massachusetts. We abstracted information for five measures of medical record documentation quality: smoking history, medications, drug allergies, compliance with screening guidelines, and immunizations. From other sources we determined physicians' specialty, gender, year of medical school graduation, and self-reported time spent teaching and in patient care.

Results

Among internists, unadjusted rates of documentation were 96.2% for immunizations, 91.6% for medications, 88% for compliance with screening guidelines, 61.6% for drug allergies, 37.8% for smoking history. Among pediatricians, rates were 100% for immunizations, 84.8% for medications, 90.8% for compliance with screening guidelines, 50.4% for drug allergies, and 20.4% for smoking history. While certain physician and patient characteristics correlated with some measures of documentation quality, documentation varied depending on the measure. For example, female internists were more likely than male internists to document smoking history (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27 – 2.83) but were less likely to document drug allergies (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 – 0.75).

Conclusions

Medical record documentation varied depending on the measure, with room for improvement in most domains. A variety of characteristics correlated with medical record documentation, but no pattern emerged. Further study could lead to targeted interventions to improve documentation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wood DL: Documentation guidelines: evolution, future direction, and compliance. American Journal of Medicine. 2001, 110: 332-334. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00748-8.CrossRefPubMed Wood DL: Documentation guidelines: evolution, future direction, and compliance. American Journal of Medicine. 2001, 110: 332-334. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00748-8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Lee M, Wang MM, Luck J: Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2000, 15: 782-788. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91007.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Lee M, Wang MM, Luck J: Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2000, 15: 782-788. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91007.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P: How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record. American Journal of Medicine. 2000, 108: 642-649. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00363-6.CrossRefPubMed Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P: How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record. American Journal of Medicine. 2000, 108: 642-649. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00363-6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M: Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000, 283: 1715-1722. 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715.CrossRefPubMed Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M: Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000, 283: 1715-1722. 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gill JM, Ewen E, Nsereko M: Impact of an electronic medical record on quality of care in a primary care office. Delaware Medical Journal. 2001, 73: 187-194.PubMed Gill JM, Ewen E, Nsereko M: Impact of an electronic medical record on quality of care in a primary care office. Delaware Medical Journal. 2001, 73: 187-194.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Brown PJ, Harwood J, Brantigan P: Data quality probes – a synergistic method for quality monitoring of electronic medical record data accuracy and healthcare provision. Medinfo. 2001, 10: 2-9. Brown PJ, Harwood J, Brantigan P: Data quality probes – a synergistic method for quality monitoring of electronic medical record data accuracy and healthcare provision. Medinfo. 2001, 10: 2-9.
7.
go back to reference Cradock J, Young AS, Sullivan G: The accuracy of medical record documentation in schizophrenia. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001, 28: 456-465.CrossRef Cradock J, Young AS, Sullivan G: The accuracy of medical record documentation in schizophrenia. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001, 28: 456-465.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barnett GO, Winickoff R, Dorsey JL, Morgan MM, Lurie RS: Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system. Med Care. 1978, 16: 962-970.CrossRefPubMed Barnett GO, Winickoff R, Dorsey JL, Morgan MM, Lurie RS: Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system. Med Care. 1978, 16: 962-970.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barnett GO: The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. New England Journal of Medicine. 1984, 310: 1643-1650.CrossRefPubMed Barnett GO: The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. New England Journal of Medicine. 1984, 310: 1643-1650.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Barnett GO, Justice NS, Somand ME, et al: COSTAR: a computer-based medical information system for ambulatory care. Proc IEEE. 1979, 67: 1226-1237.CrossRef Barnett GO, Justice NS, Somand ME, et al: COSTAR: a computer-based medical information system for ambulatory care. Proc IEEE. 1979, 67: 1226-1237.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Breslow NE, Clayton DG: Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993, 88: 9-25. Breslow NE, Clayton DG: Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993, 88: 9-25.
20.
go back to reference SAS Institute I: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8.2, vol 2. [8.2]. Cary, NC, SAS Institute. 2001 SAS Institute I: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8.2, vol 2. [8.2]. Cary, NC, SAS Institute. 2001
22.
go back to reference American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Substance Abuse: Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Drugs: The Role of the Pediatrician in Prevention and Management of Substance Abuse. Pediatrics. 1998, 101 (1): 125-128.CrossRef American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Substance Abuse: Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Drugs: The Role of the Pediatrician in Prevention and Management of Substance Abuse. Pediatrics. 1998, 101 (1): 125-128.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Health-care provider advice on tobacco use to persons aged 10–22 years – United States, 1993. MMWR. 1995, 44: 826-830. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Health-care provider advice on tobacco use to persons aged 10–22 years – United States, 1993. MMWR. 1995, 44: 826-830.
24.
go back to reference Moran MT, Wiser TH, Nanda J, Gross H: Measuring medical residents' chart-documentation practices. Journal of Medical Education. 1988, 63: 859-865.PubMed Moran MT, Wiser TH, Nanda J, Gross H: Measuring medical residents' chart-documentation practices. Journal of Medical Education. 1988, 63: 859-865.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kogan JR, Reynolds EE, Shea JA: Resident and Faculty Adherence to Common Guidelines. Acad Med. 2001, 76: S27-S29.CrossRefPubMed Kogan JR, Reynolds EE, Shea JA: Resident and Faculty Adherence to Common Guidelines. Acad Med. 2001, 76: S27-S29.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Grebe SK, Smith RB: Clinical audit and standardised follow up improve quality of documentation in diabetes care. New Zealand Medical Journal. 1995, 108: 339-342.PubMed Grebe SK, Smith RB: Clinical audit and standardised follow up improve quality of documentation in diabetes care. New Zealand Medical Journal. 1995, 108: 339-342.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Opila DA: The impact of feedback to medical housestaff on chart documentation and quality of care in the outpatient setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1997, 12: 352-356. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00059.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Opila DA: The impact of feedback to medical housestaff on chart documentation and quality of care in the outpatient setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1997, 12: 352-356. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00059.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Smith TF, Kelly R, Langa DM, Flocke SA, et al: How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits. Medical Care. 1998, 36: 851-867. 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00009.CrossRefPubMed Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Smith TF, Kelly R, Langa DM, Flocke SA, et al: How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits. Medical Care. 1998, 36: 851-867. 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00009.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting
Authors
Carlos M Soto
Kenneth P Kleinman
Steven R Simon
Publication date
01-12-2002
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2002
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-22

Other articles of this Issue 1/2002

BMC Health Services Research 1/2002 Go to the issue