Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Which factors decided general practitioners’ choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study

Authors: Hans O Birk, Lars O Henriksen

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Parts of New Public Management-reforms of the public sector depend on introduction of market-like mechanisms to manage the sector, like free choice of hospital. However, patients may delegate the choice of hospital to agents like general practitioners (GPs). We have investigated which factors Danish GPs reported as decisive for their choice of hospital on behalf of patients, and their utilisation of formal and informal data sources when they chose a hospital on behalf of patients.

Methods

Retrospective questionnaire study of all of the 474 GPs practising in three counties which constituted a single uptake area. Patients were free to choose a hospital in another county in the country. The GPs were asked about responsibility for choice of the latest three patients referred by the GP to hospital; which of 16 factors influenced the choice of hospital; which of 15 sources of information about clinical quality at various hospitals/departments were considered relevant, and how often were six sources of information about waiting time utilised.

Results

Fifty-one percent (240 GPs) filled in and returned the questionnaire. One hundred and eighty-three GPs (76%) reported that they perceived that they chose the hospital on behalf of the latest referred patient. Short distance to hospital was the most common reason for choice of hospital.
The most frequently used source of information about quality at hospital departments was anecdotal reports from patients referred previously, and the most important source of information about waiting time was the hospitals’ letters of confirmation of referrals.

Conclusions

In an area with free choice of public hospital most GPs perceived that they chose the hospital on behalf of patients. Short distance to hospital was the factor which most often decided the GPs’ choice of hospital on behalf of patients. GPs attached little weight to official information on quality and service (waiting time) at hospitals or departments, focusing instead on informal sources like feedback from patients and colleagues and their experience with cooperation with the department or hospital.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Winblad U, Ringard A: Meeting rising public expectations: the changing roles of patients and citizens. Nordic health care systems. Recent reforms and current policy challenges. Edited by: Magnussen J, Vrangbæk K, Saltman RB. 2009, Open University Press, Maidenhead Winblad U, Ringard A: Meeting rising public expectations: the changing roles of patients and citizens. Nordic health care systems. Recent reforms and current policy challenges. Edited by: Magnussen J, Vrangbæk K, Saltman RB. 2009, Open University Press, Maidenhead
2.
go back to reference Le Grand J: Motivation, agency, and public policy. Of Knights & Knaves, Pawns & Queens. 2003, Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Le Grand J: Motivation, agency, and public policy. Of Knights & Knaves, Pawns & Queens. 2003, Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vrangbæk K, Østergren K: Patient empowerment and the introduction of hospital choice in Denmark and Norway. Health Econ Policy Law. 2006, 1: 371-394. 10.1017/S1744133106005032.CrossRefPubMed Vrangbæk K, Østergren K: Patient empowerment and the introduction of hospital choice in Denmark and Norway. Health Econ Policy Law. 2006, 1: 371-394. 10.1017/S1744133106005032.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dixon A, Robertson R, Appleby J, Burge J, Devlin N, Magee H: Patient choice. How patients choose and providers respond. 2010, The King’s Fund, London Dixon A, Robertson R, Appleby J, Burge J, Devlin N, Magee H: Patient choice. How patients choose and providers respond. 2010, The King’s Fund, London
5.
go back to reference Perry G: Giving consumers of British public services more choice: what can be learned from recent history?. J Soc Policy. 2003, 32: 239-270. 10.1017/S0047279402006980.CrossRef Perry G: Giving consumers of British public services more choice: what can be learned from recent history?. J Soc Policy. 2003, 32: 239-270. 10.1017/S0047279402006980.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Thomson S, Dixon A: Choices in health care: the European experience. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006, 11: 167-171. 10.1258/135581906777641703.CrossRefPubMed Thomson S, Dixon A: Choices in health care: the European experience. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006, 11: 167-171. 10.1258/135581906777641703.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dowding K, John P: The value of choice in public policy. Public Administration. 2009, 87: 219-233. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01732.x.CrossRef Dowding K, John P: The value of choice in public policy. Public Administration. 2009, 87: 219-233. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01732.x.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wilmot S: A fair range of choice: justifying maximum patient choice in the British National Health Service. Health Care Anal. 2007, 15: 59-72. 10.1007/s10728-006-0032-6.CrossRefPubMed Wilmot S: A fair range of choice: justifying maximum patient choice in the British National Health Service. Health Care Anal. 2007, 15: 59-72. 10.1007/s10728-006-0032-6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Porter ME, Teisberg EO: Redefining Health Care. Creating value-based competition on results. 2006, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge Porter ME, Teisberg EO: Redefining Health Care. Creating value-based competition on results. 2006, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge
10.
go back to reference Appleby J, Harrison A, Devlin N: What is the real cost of more patient choice. 2003, King’s Fund, London Appleby J, Harrison A, Devlin N: What is the real cost of more patient choice. 2003, King’s Fund, London
11.
go back to reference Vrangbæk K: The interplay between central and sub-central levels: the development of a systematic standard based programme for governing medical performance in Denmark. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009, 4: 305-327. 10.1017/S1744133109005040.CrossRefPubMed Vrangbæk K: The interplay between central and sub-central levels: the development of a systematic standard based programme for governing medical performance in Denmark. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009, 4: 305-327. 10.1017/S1744133109005040.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tai-Seale M: Voting with their feet: patient exit and intergroup differences in propensity for switching usual sources of care. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2004, 29: 491-514. 10.1215/03616878-29-3-491.CrossRefPubMed Tai-Seale M: Voting with their feet: patient exit and intergroup differences in propensity for switching usual sources of care. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2004, 29: 491-514. 10.1215/03616878-29-3-491.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Le Grand J: Choice and competition in publicly funded health care. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009, 4: 479-488. 10.1017/S1744133109990077.CrossRefPubMed Le Grand J: Choice and competition in publicly funded health care. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009, 4: 479-488. 10.1017/S1744133109990077.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hirschman Bernstein AB, Gauthier AK: Choices in health care: what are they and what are they worth?. Med Care Res Rev. 1999, 56: 5-23. 10.1177/107755899773743846.CrossRef Hirschman Bernstein AB, Gauthier AK: Choices in health care: what are they and what are they worth?. Med Care Res Rev. 1999, 56: 5-23. 10.1177/107755899773743846.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bernstein AB, Gauthier AK: Choices in health care: what are they and what are they worth?. Med Care Res Rev. 1999, 56: 5-23. 10.1177/107755899773743846.CrossRefPubMed Bernstein AB, Gauthier AK: Choices in health care: what are they and what are they worth?. Med Care Res Rev. 1999, 56: 5-23. 10.1177/107755899773743846.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Martinsen DS, Vrangbæk K: The Europeanization of health care governance: implementing the market imperatives of Europe. Public Administration. 2008, 86: 169-184. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00702.x.CrossRef Martinsen DS, Vrangbæk K: The Europeanization of health care governance: implementing the market imperatives of Europe. Public Administration. 2008, 86: 169-184. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00702.x.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fotaki M, Roland R, Boyd A, McDonald R, Scheaff R, Smith L: What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 178-184. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007163.CrossRefPubMed Fotaki M, Roland R, Boyd A, McDonald R, Scheaff R, Smith L: What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 178-184. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007163.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH: The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000, 283: 1866-1874. 10.1001/jama.283.14.1866.CrossRefPubMed Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH: The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000, 283: 1866-1874. 10.1001/jama.283.14.1866.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Akerlof GA: The market for “lemons”. Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ. 1970, 84: 488-500. 10.2307/1879431.CrossRef Akerlof GA: The market for “lemons”. Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ. 1970, 84: 488-500. 10.2307/1879431.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of health care. Am Econ Rev. 1963, 53: 941-973. Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of health care. Am Econ Rev. 1963, 53: 941-973.
21.
go back to reference Loomes G, Sugden R: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J. 1982, 92: 805-824. 10.2307/2232669.CrossRef Loomes G, Sugden R: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J. 1982, 92: 805-824. 10.2307/2232669.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bell D: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res. 1982, 30: 961-981. 10.1287/opre.30.5.961.CrossRef Bell D: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res. 1982, 30: 961-981. 10.1287/opre.30.5.961.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rosen R, Curry Florin D: Public views on choices in health and health care. 2005, King’s Fund, London Rosen R, Curry Florin D: Public views on choices in health and health care. 2005, King’s Fund, London
25.
go back to reference Djis-Elsinga J, Otten W, Versluijs MM, Smeets HJ, Kievit J, Vree R, van der Made WJ, Marang-van de Mheen P: Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Med Decis Making. 2010, 30: 544-555. 10.1177/0272989X09357474.CrossRef Djis-Elsinga J, Otten W, Versluijs MM, Smeets HJ, Kievit J, Vree R, van der Made WJ, Marang-van de Mheen P: Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Med Decis Making. 2010, 30: 544-555. 10.1177/0272989X09357474.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Østerbye T, Gut R, Blæsbjerg C, Freil M: Patienters oplevelser på landets sygehuse 2004 [in Danish: Patients’ Experience at Danish Hospitals 2004]. 2005, Enheden for Brugerundersøgelser, Glostrup Østerbye T, Gut R, Blæsbjerg C, Freil M: Patienters oplevelser på landets sygehuse 2004 [in Danish: Patients’ Experience at Danish Hospitals 2004]. 2005, Enheden for Brugerundersøgelser, Glostrup
27.
go back to reference Department of Health: Report on the National Patient Choice Survey. , , , February 2010 England [online]. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_117096.pdf [homepage on the Internet] [cited on 1 April 2012] Department of Health: Report on the National Patient Choice Survey. , , , February 2010 England [online]. Available at http://​www.​dh.​gov.​uk/​prod_​consum_​dh/​groups/​dh_​digitalassets/​documents/​digitalasset/​dh_​117096.​pdf [homepage on the Internet] [cited on 1 April 2012]
28.
go back to reference Burge P, Devlin N, Appleby J, Gallo F, Nason E, Ling T: Understanding patients’ choices at the point of referral. 2006, RAND Europe, Cambridge Burge P, Devlin N, Appleby J, Gallo F, Nason E, Ling T: Understanding patients’ choices at the point of referral. 2006, RAND Europe, Cambridge
29.
go back to reference Rosen R, Florin D, Hutt R: The anatomy of GP referral decisions. A qualitative study of GPs’ views on their role in supporting patient choice. 2007, King’s Fund, London Rosen R, Florin D, Hutt R: The anatomy of GP referral decisions. A qualitative study of GPs’ views on their role in supporting patient choice. 2007, King’s Fund, London
30.
go back to reference Wiinblad U: Do physicians care about patient choice?. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 67: 1502-1511. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.016.CrossRef Wiinblad U: Do physicians care about patient choice?. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 67: 1502-1511. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.016.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Strandberg-Larsen M, Nielsen MB, Vallgårda S, Krasnik A, Vrangbæk K, Mossialos E: Denmark: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2007, 9 (6): 1-164. Strandberg-Larsen M, Nielsen MB, Vallgårda S, Krasnik A, Vrangbæk K, Mossialos E: Denmark: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2007, 9 (6): 1-164.
32.
go back to reference Vrangbæk K: Markedsorientering i sygehussektoren [in Danish: Market orientation in the hospital sector]. PhD-thesis. 1999, Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Vrangbæk K: Markedsorientering i sygehussektoren [in Danish: Market orientation in the hospital sector]. PhD-thesis. 1999, Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
33.
go back to reference Mahon A, Whitehouse C, Wilkin D, Nocon A: Factors that influence general practitioners’ choice of hospital when referring patients for elective surgery. Br J Gen Pract. 1993, 43: 272-276.PubMedPubMedCentral Mahon A, Whitehouse C, Wilkin D, Nocon A: Factors that influence general practitioners’ choice of hospital when referring patients for elective surgery. Br J Gen Pract. 1993, 43: 272-276.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Odell A: A study of patient referrals. Publ Hlth Lond. 1983, 97: 109-114. 10.1016/S0033-3506(83)80007-9.CrossRef Odell A: A study of patient referrals. Publ Hlth Lond. 1983, 97: 109-114. 10.1016/S0033-3506(83)80007-9.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kennedy F, McConnell : General practitioner referral patterns. J Public Health Med. 1993, 15: 83-87.PubMed Kennedy F, McConnell : General practitioner referral patterns. J Public Health Med. 1993, 15: 83-87.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Ringard A, Rico A: Introducing patient choice of hospital in National Health Systems – A comparison of the UK and Norway. Working Paper. 2006, Health Organization Research Norway (HORN), Oslo Ringard A, Rico A: Introducing patient choice of hospital in National Health Systems – A comparison of the UK and Norway. Working Paper. 2006, Health Organization Research Norway (HORN), Oslo
37.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324: 1183-1191. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324: 1183-1191. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Lov om et videnskabsetisk komitésystem og behandling af biomedicinske forskningsprojekter [in Danish: Act on a Biomedical Ethics Committee System and the Processing of Biomedical Research Projects]. Available in English from: http://www.cvk.sum.dk/English/actonabiomedicalresearch.aspx [homepage on the Internet] [cited on 1 April 2012] Lov om et videnskabsetisk komitésystem og behandling af biomedicinske forskningsprojekter [in Danish: Act on a Biomedical Ethics Committee System and the Processing of Biomedical Research Projects]. Available in English from: http://​www.​cvk.​sum.​dk/​English/​actonabiomedical​research.​aspx [homepage on the Internet] [cited on 1 April 2012]
39.
go back to reference Ringard Å: Why do general practitioners abandon the local hospital? An analysis of referral decisions related to elective treatment. Scand J Public Health. 2010, 38: 597-604. 10.1177/1403494810371019.CrossRefPubMed Ringard Å: Why do general practitioners abandon the local hospital? An analysis of referral decisions related to elective treatment. Scand J Public Health. 2010, 38: 597-604. 10.1177/1403494810371019.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Dixon A, Robertson R, Bal R: The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010, 5: 295-317. 10.1017/S1744133110000058.CrossRefPubMed Dixon A, Robertson R, Bal R: The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010, 5: 295-317. 10.1017/S1744133110000058.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Mol A: The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. 2008, Routledge, Abingdon Mol A: The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. 2008, Routledge, Abingdon
42.
go back to reference de Mheen PJ Marang-van, Dijs-Elsinga J, Otten W, Versluijs M, Smeets HJ, Vree R, van der Made WJ, Kievit J: The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment. Med Decis Making. 2011, 31: 816-10.1177/0272989X11386799.CrossRef de Mheen PJ Marang-van, Dijs-Elsinga J, Otten W, Versluijs M, Smeets HJ, Vree R, van der Made WJ, Kievit J: The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment. Med Decis Making. 2011, 31: 816-10.1177/0272989X11386799.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Adams EK, Wright KE: Hospital choice of Medicare beneficiaries in a rural market: why not the closest?. J Rural Health. 1991, 7: 134-152. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1991.tb00715.x.CrossRefPubMed Adams EK, Wright KE: Hospital choice of Medicare beneficiaries in a rural market: why not the closest?. J Rural Health. 1991, 7: 134-152. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1991.tb00715.x.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference McArdle PJ, Whitnall M: The referral practice of general medical practitioners to the surgical specialties: implications for the future. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996, 34: 394-399. 10.1016/S0266-4356(96)90094-7.CrossRefPubMed McArdle PJ, Whitnall M: The referral practice of general medical practitioners to the surgical specialties: implications for the future. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996, 34: 394-399. 10.1016/S0266-4356(96)90094-7.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Morrell DC, Roland MO: Analysis of referral behaviour: responses to simulated case histories may not reflect real clinical behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 1990, 40: 182-185.PubMedPubMedCentral Morrell DC, Roland MO: Analysis of referral behaviour: responses to simulated case histories may not reflect real clinical behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 1990, 40: 182-185.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Conner-Spady B, Sanmartin C, Johnston G, McGurran J, Kehler M, Noseworthy T: Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty. CMAJ. 2008, 179: 327-332. 10.1503/cmaj.071659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Conner-Spady B, Sanmartin C, Johnston G, McGurran J, Kehler M, Noseworthy T: Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty. CMAJ. 2008, 179: 327-332. 10.1503/cmaj.071659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Dunn E, Black C, Alonso J, Nørregaard JC, Anderson GF: Patients’ acceptance of waiting time for cataract surgery: what makes a wait too long?. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 44: 1603-1610. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00251-1.CrossRefPubMed Dunn E, Black C, Alonso J, Nørregaard JC, Anderson GF: Patients’ acceptance of waiting time for cataract surgery: what makes a wait too long?. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 44: 1603-1610. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00251-1.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference De Groot IB, Otten W, Smeets HJ, Marang-van de Mheen PJ: Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011, 11: 214-10.1186/1472-6963-11-214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral De Groot IB, Otten W, Smeets HJ, Marang-van de Mheen PJ: Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011, 11: 214-10.1186/1472-6963-11-214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Burge P, Devlin N, Appleby J, Rohr C, Grant J: Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: a discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Choice Project. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004, 3: 183-194. 10.2165/00148365-200403040-00002.CrossRefPubMed Burge P, Devlin N, Appleby J, Rohr C, Grant J: Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: a discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Choice Project. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004, 3: 183-194. 10.2165/00148365-200403040-00002.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Praksistælling 2003 [in Danish: ” General Practices in 2003”]. 2003, The Danish General Practitioners Organisation, Copenhagen Praksistælling 2003 [in Danish: ” General Practices in 2003”]. 2003, The Danish General Practitioners Organisation, Copenhagen
Metadata
Title
Which factors decided general practitioners’ choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study
Authors
Hans O Birk
Lars O Henriksen
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-126

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Go to the issue